Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1393564
Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography for differential diagnosis of pancreatic cysts
Publication History
submitted: 07 December 2014
accepted after revision: 18 August 2015
Publication Date:
25 November 2015 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/endoscopy/201601/lookinside/thumbnails/11807_10-1055-s-0034-1393564-1.jpg)
Background and study aim: Comparison of fundamental B-mode endoscopic ultrasonography (FB-EUS) and contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (CH-EUS) in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cysts according to presence of mural nodules.
Patients and methods: Between April 2007 and April 2012, FB-EUS and CH-EUS data were prospectively collected from 581 consecutive patients with pancreatic cysts, and were retrospectively analyzed from 70 with subsequent cyst resection. Presence and height of mural nodules as detected on FB-EUS and CH-EUS were evaluated, and thence accuracies of both methods for diagnosing mucinous versus nonmucinous and malignant versus benign cysts.
Results: On pathological examination 48 cysts were mucinous and 22 were nonmucinous; 30 cysts were malignant (high grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma) and 40 were benign. If presence of a mural nodule was considered to indicate a mucinous cyst, FB-EUS and CH-EUS accuracies did not differ significantly (respectively: sensitivity 85 % vs. 79 %; specificity 46 % vs. 96 %; accuracy 73 % vs. 84 %, P = 0.057). If presence of mural nodule was considered to indicate malignancy, CH-EUS was significantly more accurate than FB-EUS (respectively: sensitivity 97 % vs. 97 %; specificity 75 % vs. 40 %; accuracy 84 % vs. 64 %, P = 0.0001). For diagnosing malignancy by evaluating mural nodule height, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) was 0.84 and 0.93 for FB-EUS and CH-EUS, respectively (P = 0.028). Presence of a mural nodule of height ≥ 4 mm on CH-EUS was a sign of malignancy (false-positive fraction 0.2; true-positive fraction 0.93; odds ratio 56.0).
Conclusions: CH-EUS is more accurate than FB-EUS for diagnosing malignant pancreatic cysts.
-
References
- 1 Scheiman JM, Hwang JH, Moayyedi P. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic neoplastic pancreatic cysts. Gastroenterology 2015; 148: 824-848
- 2 Vege SS, Ziring B, Jain R et al. American Gastroenterological Association Institute guidelines on the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic neoplastic pancreatic cysts. Gastroenterology 04/2015; 148: 819-822
- 3 Brugge WR, Lewandrowski K, Lee-Lewandrowski E et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a report of the cooperative pancreatic cyst study. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 1330-1336
- 4 Koito K, Namieno T, Nagakawa T et al. Solitary cystic tumor of the pancreas: EUS-pathologic correlation. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 45: 268-276
- 5 Kubo H, Nakamura K, Itaba S et al. Differential diagnosis of cystic tumors of the pancreas by endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 684-689
- 6 Kamata K, Kitano M, Kudo M et al. Value of EUS in early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 22-29
- 7 Kitano M, Sakamoto H, Matsui U et al. A novel perfusion imaging technique of the pancreas: contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 141-150
- 8 Sakamoto H, Kitano M, Suetomi Y et al. Utility of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosis of small pancreatic carcinomas. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008; 34: 525-532
- 9 Fusaroli P, Spada A, Mancino MG et al. Contrast harmonic echo-endoscopic ultrasound improves accuracy in diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 629-634
- 10 Napoleon B, Alvarez-Sanchez MV, Gincoul R et al. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound in solid lesions of the pancreas: results of a pilot study. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 564-70
- 11 Kitano M, Kudo M, Yamao K et al. Characterization of small solid tumors in the pancreas: the value of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 303-310
- 12 Kitano M, Isayama H, Yamao K eds. Gastroenterological endoscopy handbook. 1st edn. Nihon Medical Center. Tokyo: Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society; 2012: 111-122
- 13 Adsay NV, Fukushima N, Furukawa T et al. Intraductal neoplasms of the pancreas. In: Bosman FT, Hruban RH Cameiro F et al., eds. WHO classification of tumors of the digestive system. WHO classification of tumors. 4th edn. Lyon: IARC; 2010: 304-313
- 14 Samarasena JB, Nakai Y, Chang KJ et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic cystic lesions: a practical approach to diagnosis and management. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2012; 22: 169-185
- 15 Dal Molin M, Matthaei H, Wu J et al. Clinicopathological correlates of activating GNAS mutations in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20: 3802-3808
- 16 Konda VJ, Meining A, Jamil LH et al. A pilot study of in vivo identification of pancreatic cystic neoplasms with needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy under endosonographic guideline. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 1006-1013
- 17 Pitman MB, Genevay M, Yaeger K et al. High-grade atypical epithelial cells in pancreatic mucinous cysts are more accurate predictor of malignancy than “positive” cytology. Cancer Cytopathol 2010; 118: 434-440
- 18 Genevay M, Mino-Kenudson M, Yaeger K et al. Cytology adds value to imaging studies for risk assessment of malignancy in pancreatic mucinous cysts. Ann Surg 2011; 254: 977-983
- 19 Jacobson BC, Baron TH, Adler DG et al. ASGE guideline: the role of endoscopy in the diagnosis and the management of cystic lesions and inflammatory fluid collections of the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 363-370
- 20 Tanaka M, Femandez-del Castillo C, Adsay V et al. International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology 2012; 12: 183-197
- 21 Van der Waaij LA, van Dullemen HM, Porte RJ et al. Cyst fluid analysis in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions: a pooled analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 383-389
- 22 Varadarajulu S, Mohamad A. Eloubeidi. Frequency and significance of acute intracystic hemorrhage during EUS-FNA of cystic lesions of the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 631-635
- 23 O’Toole D, Palazzo L, Arotcarena R et al. Assessment of complications of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 470-474
- 24 Williams DB, Sahai AV, Aabakken L et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: a large single centre experience. Gut 1999; 44: 720-726
- 25 Walsh RM, Zuccaro G, Dumot JA et al. Predicting success of endoscopic aspiration for suspected pancreatic cystic neoplasms. JOP 2008; 9: 612-617
- 26 Yamaguchi k, Ohuchida J, Ohtsuka T et al. Intraductal papillary-mucinous tumor of the pancreas concomitant with ductal carcinoma of the pancreas. Pancreatology 2002; 2: 484-490
- 27 Uehara H, Nakaizumi A, Ishikawa O et al. Development of ductal carcinoma of the pancreas during follow-up of branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. Gut 2008; 57: 1561-1565
- 28 Tada M, Kawabe T, Arizumi M et al. Pancreatic cancer in patients with pancreatic cystic lesions: a prospective study in 197 patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4: 1265-1270
- 29 Anand N, Sampath K, Wu BU et al. Cyst features and risk of malignancy in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 913-921
- 30 Akita H, Takeda Y, Hoshino H et al. Mural nodule in branch duct-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas is a marker of malignant transformation and indication for surgery. Am J Surg 2011; 202: 214-219
- 31 Kawada N, Uehara H, Nagata S et al. Predictors of malignancy in branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. JOP 2014; 15: 459-464
- 32 Hirono S, Tani M, Kawai M et al. The carcinoembryonic antigen level in pancreatic juice and mural nodule size are predictors of malignancy for branch duct type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. Ann Surg 2012; 255: 517-522
- 33 Ohno E, Hirooka Y, Itoh A et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: differentiation of malignant and benign tumors by endoscopic ultrasound findings of mural nodules. Ann Surg 2009; 249: 628-634
- 34 Kurihara N, Kawamoto H, Kobayashi Y et al. Vascular patterns in nodules of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms depicted under contrast-enhanced ultrasonography are helpful for evaluating malignant potential. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 66-70
- 35 Koshita S, Fujita N, Noda Y et al. Invasive carcinoma derived from “flat type” branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: impact of classification according to the height of mural nodule on endoscopic ultrasonography. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2015; 22: 301-319