Download PDF
J Wrist Surg 2014; 03(04): 235-238
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1394363
Special Focus Section: Transverse Carpal Ligament
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Carpal Tunnel Release: Do We Understand the Biomechanical Consequences?

Nathan T. Morrell
1   Department of Orthopedics, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
,
Andrew Harris
1   Department of Orthopedics, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
,
Christian Skjong
1   Department of Orthopedics, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
,
Edward Akelman
1   Department of Orthopedics, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
24 October 2014 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Corrected by:

Carpal Tunnel Release: Do We Understand the Biomechanical Consequences?J Wrist Surg 2016; 05(02): 167-167
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1580088

Abstract

Carpal tunnel release is a very common procedure performed in the United States. While the procedure is often curative, some patients experience postoperative scar sensitivity, pillar pain, grip weakness, or recurrent median nerve symptoms. Release of the carpal tunnel has an effect on carpal anatomy and biomechanics, including increases in carpal arch width and carpal tunnel volume and changes in muscle and tendon mechanics. Our understanding of how these biomechanical changes contribute to postoperative symptoms is still evolving. We review the relevant morphometric and biomechanical changes that occur following release of the transverse carpal ligament.

Keywords

carpal tunnel release - transverse carpal ligament - carpal canal - biomechanics - pillar pain
 

  • References

  • 1 Einhorn N, Leddy JP. Pitfalls of endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Orthop Clin North Am 1996; 27 (2) 373-380
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Pacek CA, Tang J, Goitz RJ, Kaufmann RA, Li ZM. Morphological analysis of the carpal tunnel. Hand (NY) 2010; 5 (1) 77-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Gartsman GM, Kovach JC, Crouch CC, Noble PC, Bennett JB. Carpal arch alteration after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am 1986; 11 (3) 372-374
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ludlow KS, Merla JL, Cox JA, Hurst LN. Pillar pain as a postoperative complication of carpal tunnel release: a review of the literature. J Hand Ther 1997; 10 (4) 277-282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Brooks JJ, Schiller JR, Allen SD, Akelman E. Biomechanical and anatomical consequences of carpal tunnel release. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2003; 18 (8) 685-693
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cobb TK, Dalley BK, Posteraro RH, Lewis RC. Anatomy of the flexor retinaculum. J Hand Surg Am 1993; 18 (1) 91-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Manley M, Boardman M, Goitz RJ. The carpal insertions of the transverse carpal ligament. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (4) 729-732
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Seradge H, Seradge E. Piso-triquetral pain syndrome after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am 1989; 14 (5) 858-862
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Garcia-Elias M, An KN, Cooney WP, Linscheid RL, Chao EY. Transverse stability of the carpus. An analytical study. J Orthop Res 1989; 7 (5) 738-743
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Amadio PC. The first carpal tunnel release?. J Hand Surg [Br] 1995; 20 (1) 40-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Scholten RJ, Mink van der Molen A, Uitdehaag BM, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Surgical treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (4) CD003905
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Tanabe T, Okutsu I. An anatomical study of the palmar ligamentous structures of the carpal canal. J Hand Surg [Br] 1997; 22 (6) 754-757
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Garcia-Elias M, Sanchez-Freijo JM, Salo JM, Lluch AL. Dynamic changes of the transverse carpal arch during flexion-extension of the wrist: effects of sectioning the transverse carpal ligament. J Hand Surg Am 1992; 17 (6) 1017-1019
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Viegas SF, Pollard A, Kaminksi K. Carpal arch alteration and related clinical status after endoscopic carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am 1992; 17 (6) 1012-1016
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Roger B, Chaise F, Laval-Jeantet M. X-ray computed tomographic analysis of structural changes of the carpal bones, after section of the anterior annular ligament [in French]. J Radiol 1985; 66 (11) 693-697
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Schmitt R, Lucas D, Buhmann S, Lanz U, Schindler G. Morphometry using computerized tomography of the wrist in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Comparison of pre- and postoperative findings [in German]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 1988; 20 (1) 41-46
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Richman JA, Gelberman RH, Rydevik BL, Gylys-Morin VM, Hajek PC, Sartoris DJ. Carpal tunnel volume determination by magnetic resonance imaging three-dimensional reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am 1987; 12 (5 Pt 1) 712-717
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Richman JA, Gelberman RH, Rydevik BL , et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: morphologic changes after release of the transverse carpal ligament. J Hand Surg Am 1989; 14 (5) 852-857
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ablove RH, Peimer CA, Diao E, Oliverio R, Kuhn JP. Morphologic changes following endoscopic and two-portal subcutaneous carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am 1994; 19 (5) 821-826
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kato T, Kuroshima N, Okutsu I, Ninomiya S. Effects of endoscopic release of the transverse carpal ligament on carpal canal volume. J Hand Surg Am 1994; 19 (3) 416-419
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Guo X, Fan Y, Li ZM. Effects of dividing the transverse carpal ligament on the mechanical behavior of the carpal bones under axial compressive load: a finite element study. Med Eng Phys 2009; 31 (2) 188-194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Garcia-Elias M, An KN, Cooney III WP, Linscheid RL, Chao EY. Stability of the transverse carpal arch: an experimental study. J Hand Surg Am 1989; 14 (2 Pt 1) 277-282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hunter JM. Recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome, epineural fibrous fixation, and traction neuropathy. Hand Clin 1991; 7 (3) 491-504
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Fuss FK, Wagner TF. Biomechanical alterations in the carpal arch and hand muscles after carpal tunnel release: a further approach toward understanding the function of the flexor retinaculum and the cause of postoperative grip weakness. Clin Anat 1996; 9 (2) 100-108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kiritsis PG, Kline SC. Biomechanical changes after carpal tunnel release: a cadaveric model for comparing open, endoscopic, and step-cut lengthening techniques. J Hand Surg Am 1995; 20 (2) 173-180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Wilson KM. Double incision open technique for carpal tunnel release: an alternative to endoscopic release. J Hand Surg Am 1994; 19 (6) 907-912
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Tung WL, Zhao C, Yoshii Y, Su FC, An KN, Amadio PC. Comparative study of carpal tunnel compliance in the human, dog, rabbit, and rat. J Orthop Res 2010; 28 (5) 652-656
    PubMedGoogle Scholar