Am J Perinatol 2015; 32(08): 725-732
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1395479
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Outcomes for Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Small for Gestational Age Preterm Infants in Canadian Tertiary NICUs

Authors

  • Mingyan Hei

    1   Department of Pediatrics, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
  • Shoo K. Lee

    2   Department of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    3   Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Prakesh S. Shah

    2   Department of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    3   Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Amish Jain

    2   Department of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    3   Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • for the Canadian Neonatal Network
Further Information

Publication History

02 June 2014

09 September 2014

Publication Date:
23 December 2014 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to compare the outcomes for symmetrical (sSGA) versus asymmetrical (aSGA) small for gestational age (SGA) < 32 weeks preterm infants.

Study Design A total of 12,179 eligible infants admitted to the Canadian tertiary neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) over a 7-year-period in the Canadian Neonatal Network database were subcategorized as aSGA (n = 536), sSGA (n = 732), or appropriate for GA (AGA, n = 10,911). Baseline demographics, mortality, and major morbidities were compared using multivariable analysis to calculate adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results sSGA had higher GA (p < 0.01) and more antenatal tobacco exposure (p = 0.03). Although both the SGA groups had worse outcomes than AGA controls, aSGA versus sSGA comparison revealed lower odds (AOR [CI]) for mortality and chronic lung disease (CLD) for aSGA in the entire cohort (0.45 [0.27, 0.75] and 0.61 [0.44, 0.84], respectively) as well as for infants < 28 weeks GA (0.50 [0.27, 0.92] and 0.47 [0.29, 0.77], respectively). aSGA infants < 28 weeks GA had comparable outcomes to AGA except higher odds for CLD (1.61 [1.13, 2.27]). sSGA infants needed longer hospital stay and had higher use of oxygen and continuous positive airway pressure than aSGA.

Conclusion Among SGA infants < 32 weeks GA, significant intragroup differences exist in the neonatal outcomes and hospital resource utilization depending upon the presence or absence of relative “head sparing.”