PDF herunterladen
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2015; 75(2): 137-144
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1396323
Guideline
GebFra Science
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Management of 3rd and 4th Degree Perineal Tears after Vaginal Birth. German Guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (AWMF Registry No. 015/079, October 2014)

Management von Dammrissen III. und IV. Grades nach vaginaler Geburt (S1-Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, AWMF-Registernumner 015/079, Oktober 2014)
T. Aigmueller   *
1   Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe Graz, Österreich
,
W. Bader   *
2   Klinikum Bielefeld, Bielefeld
,
K. Beilecke
3   Klinik St. Hedwig, KH Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg
,
K. Elenskaia
4   Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich
,
A. Frudinger
1   Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe Graz, Österreich
,
E. Hanzal
4   Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich
,
H. Helmer
4   Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich
,
H. Huemer
5   Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Österreich
,
M. van der Kleyn
6   FH Joanneum, Graz, Österreich
,
D. Koelle
7   Spital Region Oberaargau/Langenthal
,
S. Kropshofer
8   Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Österreich
,
J. Pfeiffer
1   Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe Graz, Österreich
,
C. Reisenauer
9   Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen
,
A. Tammaa
10   Wilhelminenspital Wien, Wien, Österreich
,
K. Tamussino
1   Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe Graz, Österreich
,
W. Umek
4   Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
16. März 2015 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Homepage

http://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/015-079.html

Date of publication

02.10.2014

Next assessment planned

02.10.2017

Declarations of conflicts of interest

available on the AWMF homepage under: http://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/015-079.html

Participating professional societies and organisations:

  • German Society for Gynaecology and Obstetrics (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe [DGGG] e. V.) (responsible)

  • Scientific and Medical Professional Societies (Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V. [AWMF])

  • Consortium for Urogynaecology and Plastic Pelvic Floor Reconstruction (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Urogynäkologie und plastische Beckenbodenrekonstruktion AGUB)

  • Austrian Urogynecology Working Group (Österreichische Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Urogynäkologie und Rekonstruktive Beckenbodenchirurgie [AUB])

  • German Society for Midwife Science (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hebammenwissenschaft)

  • Consortium for Materno-Foetal Medicine (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für materno-fetale Medizin e. V. [AGMFM])

  • Consortium for Medical Rights of the DGGG (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medizinrecht der DGGG [AGMedR])

  • Consortium for Hypetension in Pregnancy/Gestosis (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Schwangerschaftshochdruck/Gestose e. V.)

  • German Society for Prenatal and Neonatal Medicine (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Pränatal- und Geburtsmedizin]

  • Surgical Consortium for Coloproctology in Germany (Chirurgische Arbeitsgemeinschaft Coloproktologie Deutschland [CACP])

  • German Society for Coloproctology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Koloproktologie [DGK])

  • Swiss Consortium for Urogynaecology and Pelvic Floor Pathology (Schweizerische Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Urogynäkologie und Beckenbodenpathologie [AUG])

  • Consortium for Coloproctology in Austria (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Coloproktologie Österreich [ACP])

  • Austrian Society for Gynaecology and Obstetrics (Österreichische Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe [OEGGG])

* To be considered equally as first authors.


Supporting Information

 

  • III References

  • 1 Oberaigner W, Leitner H, Kölle D. Geburtenregister Tirol – Bericht über die Geburtshilfe in Tirol 2010. Innsbruck: Eigenverlag; 2011
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland. Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes. Online: http://www.gbe-bund.de/oowa921-install/servlet/oowa/aw92/WS0100/_XWD_FORMPROC?TARGET=&PAGE=_XWD_106&OPINDEX=3&HANDLER=_XWD_CUBE.SETPGS&DATACUBE=_XWD_134&D.001=1000001&D.946=32202 Stand: 10.05.2014
    PubMed
  • 3 Dudding TC, Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA. Obstetric anal sphincter injury: incidence, risk factors, and management. Ann Surg 2008; 247: 224-237
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG 2013; 120: 1516-1525
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Pollack J, Nordenstam J, Brismar S et al. Anal incontinence after vaginal delivery: a five-year prospective cohort study. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 1397-1402
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Nordenstam J, Altman D, Brismar S et al. Natural progression of anal incontinence after child-birth. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009; 20: 1029-1035
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Frudinger A, Ballon M, Taylor SA et al. The natural history of clinically unrecognized anal sphincter tears over 10 years after first vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111: 1058-1064
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 de Leeuw JW, Struijk PC, Vierhout ME et al. Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. BJOG 2001; 108: 383-387
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Gottvall K, Allebeck P, Ekéus C. Risk factors for anal sphincter tears: the importance of maternal position at birth. BJOG 2007; 114: 1266-1272
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Lowder JL, Burrows LJ, Krohn MA et al. Risk factors for primary and subsequent anal sphincter lacerations: a comparison of cohorts by parity and prior mode of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196: 344.e1-344.e5
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Landy HJ, Laughon SK, Bailit JL et al. Characteristics associated with severe perineal and cervical lacerations during vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 627-635
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Groutz A, Hasson J, Wengier A et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears: prevalence and risk factors in the third millennium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204: 347.e1-347.e4
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN et al. Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ 1994; 308: 887-891
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Baghestan E, Irgens LM, Børdahl PE et al. Familial risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: registry-based cohort study. BJOG 2013; 120: 831-837
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Smith LA, Price N, Simonite V et al. Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013; 13: 59
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Dahlen H, Priddis H, Schmied V et al. Trends and risk factors for severe perineal trauma during childbirth in New South Wales between 2000 and 2008: a population-based data study. BMJ Open 2013; 3: e002824
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Jangö H, Langhoff-Roos J, Rosthøj S et al. Modifiable risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210: 59.e1-59.e6
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Ampt AJ, Ford JB, Roberts CL et al. Trends in obstetric anal sphincter injuries and associated risk factors for vaginal singleton term births in New South Wales 2001–2009. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2013; 53: 9-16
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Lindholm ES, Altman D. Risk of obstetric anal sphincter lacerations among obese women. BJOG 2013; 120: 1110-1115
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Räisänen S, Cartwright R, Gissler M et al. The burden of OASIS increases along with socioeconomic position–register-based analysis of 980,733 births in Finland. PLoS One 2013; 8: e73515
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Mei-dan E, Walfisch A, Raz I et al. Perineal massage during pregnancy: a prospective controlled trial. Isr Med Assoc J 2008; 10: 499-502
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Beckmann MM, Stock OM. Antenatal perineal massage for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (4) CD005123
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Aasheim V, Nilsen AB, Lukasse M et al. Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (12) CD006672
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Ruckhäberle E, Jundt K, Bäuerle M et al. Prospective randomised multicentre trial with the birth trainer EPI-NO for the prevention of perineal trauma. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 49: 478-483
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Shek KL, Chantarasorn V, Langer S et al. Does the Epi-No® Birth Trainer reduce levator trauma? A randomised controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J 2011; 22: 1521-1528
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Eskandar O, Shet D. Risk factors for 3rd and 4th degree perineal tear. J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 29: 119-122
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Baumann P, Hammoud AO, McNeeley SG et al. Factors associated with anal sphincter laceration in 40,923 primiparous women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007; 18: 985-990
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Carroli G, Mignini L. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (1) CD000081
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Murphy DJ, Macleod M, Bahl R et al. A randomised controlled trial of routine versus restrictive use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery: a multicentre pilot study. BJOG 2008; 115: 1695-1702
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY eds. Williams Obstetrics. 23rd. ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2009
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Guideline No. 29, Clinical Green Top Guidelines: Management of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears following vaginal delivery – March 2007. Online: http://www.rcog.org.uk/guidelines last access: 26.02.2015
    PubMed
  • 32 Lindqvist PG, Jernetz M. A modified surgical approach to women with obstetric anal sphincter tears by separate suturing of external and internal anal sphincter. A modified approach to obstetric anal sphincter injury. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010; 10: 51
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Mahony R, Behan M, Daly L et al. Internal anal sphincter defect influences continence outcome following obstetric anal sphincter injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196: 217.e1-217.e5
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Rieger N, Perera S, Stephens J et al. Anal sphincter function and integrity after primary repair of third-degree tear: uncontrolled prospective analysis. ANZ J Surg 2004; 74: 122-124
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Chew SS, Rieger NA. Transperineal repair of obstetric-related anovaginal fistula. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 44: 68-71
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Rahman MS, Al-Suleiman SA, El-Yahia AR et al. Surgical treatment of rectovaginal fistula of obstetric origin: a review of 15 yearsʼ experience in a teaching hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 23: 607-610
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Sultan AH. Primary and secondary anal Sphincter Repair. In: Stanton SL, Zimmern PE, eds. Female pelvic reconstructive Surgery. London: Springer; 2003: 149-157
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Scheer I, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Mode of delivery after previous obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)–a reappraisal?. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009; 20: 1095-1101
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Nordenstam J, Mellgren A, Altman D et al. Immediate or delayed repair of obstetric anal sphincter tears – a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2008; 115: 857-865
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Duggal N, Mercado C, Daniels K et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of post-partum perineal wound complications: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111: 1268-1273
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Briel JW, de Boer LM, Hop WCJ et al. Clinical outcome of anterior overlapping external anal sphincter repair with internal anal sphincter imbrication. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41: 209-214
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Thakar R, Sultan AH. Management of obstetric anal sphincter injury. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 5: 72-78
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Sultan AH, Monga AK, Kumar D et al. Primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter rupture using the overlap technique. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 318-323
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 44 Priddis H, Dahlen HG, Schmied V et al. Risk of recurrence, subsequent mode of birth and morbidity for women who experienced severe perineal trauma in a first birth in New South Wales between 2000–2008: a population based data linkage study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013; 13: 89
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 45 Edwards H, Grotegut C, Harmanli OH et al. Is severe perineal damage increased in women with prior anal sphincter injury?. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006; 13: 723-727
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 46 Fernando RJ, Sultan AH et al. Repair techniques for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a randomised controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 1261-1268
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 47 Fernando R, Sultan A, Kettle C et al. Methods of repair for obstetric anal sphincter injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (12) CD002866
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 48 Farrell SA, Gilmour D, Turnbull GK et al. Overlapping compared with end-to-end repair of third- and fourth-degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 16-24
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 49 Hasegawa H, Yoshioka K, Keighley MR. Randomized trial of fecal diversion for sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 961-964 discussion 964–965
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 50 Clark CL, Wilkinson KH, Rihani HR et al. Peri-operative management of patients having external anal sphincter repairs: temporary prevention of defaecation does not improve outcomes. Colorectal Dis 2001; 3: 238-244
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 51 Mahony R, Behan M, OʼHerlihy C et al. Randomized, clinical trial of bowel confinement versus laxative use after primary repair of a third-degree obstetric anal sphincter tear. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 12-17
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 52 Stock L, Basham E, Gossett DR et al. Factors associated with wound complications in women with obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208: 327.e1-327.e6
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 53 Williams A, Adams EJ, Tincello DG et al. How to repair an anal sphincter injury after vaginal delivery: results of a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2006; 113: 201-207
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 54 Garcia V, Rogers RG, Kim SS et al. Primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter laceration: a randomized trial of two surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 1697-1701
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 55 Malouf AJ, Norton CS, Engel AF et al. Longterm results of overlapping anterior anal sphincter repair for obstetric trauma. Lancet 2000; 355: 260-265
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 56 Fitzpatrick M, Behan M, OʼConnell R et al. A randomised clinical trial comparing primary overlap with approximation repair of third degree tears. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 1220-1224
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 57 Peirce C, Murphy C, Fitzpatrick M et al. Randomised controlled trial comparing early home biofeedback physiotherapy with pelvic floor exercises for the treatment of third-degree tears (EBAPT Trial). BJOG 2013; 120: 1240-1247 discussion 1246
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 58 Schwandner T, König IR, Heimerl T et al. Triple target treatment (3T) is more effective than biofeedback alone for anal incontinence: the 3T-AI study. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53: 1007-1016
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 59 Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJ, Dekker GA et al. Third degree obstetric perineal tears: risk factors and the preventative role of mediolateral episiotomy. BJOG 1997; 104: 563-566
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 60 Frudinger A, Ballon M, Taylor SA et al. The natural history of clinically unrecognized anal sphincter tears over 10 years after first vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111: 1058-1064
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 61 Peleg D, Kennedy CM, Merrill D et al. Risk of repetition of a severe perineal laceration. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 1021
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 62 Payne TN, Carey JC, Rayburn WF. Prior third- or fourth-degree perineal tears and recurrence risks. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999; 64: 55
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 63 Harkin R, Fitzpatrick M, OʼConnell PR et al. Anal sphincter disruption at vaginal delivery: is recurrence predictable?. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003; 109: 149
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 64 Elfaghi I, Johansson-Ernste B, Rydhstroem H. Rupture of the sphincter ani: the recurrence rate in second delivery. BJOG 2004; 111: 1361
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 65 Baghestan E, Irgens LM, Børdahl PE et al. Risk of recurrence and subsequent delivery after obstetric anal sphincter injuries. BJOG 2012; 119: 62-69
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 66 Basham E, Stock L, Lewicky-Gaupp C et al. Subsequent pregnancy out-comes after obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2013; 19: 328-332
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 67 Bek KM, Laurberg S. Risks of anal incontinence from subsequent vaginal delivery after a complete obstetric anal sphincter tear. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 724-726
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 68 Fynes M, Donnelly V, Behan M et al. Effect of second vaginal delivery on anorectal physiology and faecal continence: a prospective study. Lancet 1999; 354: 983-986
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 69 Faltin DL, Otero M, Petignat P et al. Womenʼs health 18 years after rupture of the anal sphincter during childbirth: I. Fecal incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 1255-1259
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 70 Sze EH. Anal incontinence among women with one versus two complete third-degree perineal lacerations. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005; 90: 213-217
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 71 Laughon KS, Berghella V, Reddy UM et al. Neonatal and maternal outcomes with prolonged second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124: 57-67
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 72 Blomberg M. Maternal body mass index and risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014: 395803
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 73 Dahlen HG, Ryan M, Homer CS et al. An Australian prospective cohort study of risk factors for severe perineal trauma during childbirth. Midwifery 2007; 23: 196-203
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 74 Samuelsson E, Ladfors L, Wennerholm UB et al. Anal sphincter tears: prospective study of obstetric risk factors. BJOG 2000; 107: 926-931
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 75 Kettle C, Tohill S. Perineal care. BMJ Clin Evid 2011; 2011 pii: 1401
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 76 Baghestan E, Irgens LM, Børdahl PE et al. Trends in risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in Norway. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 25-34
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 77 Burnett SJ, Spence-Jones C, Speakman CT et al. Unsuspected sphincter damage following childbirth revealed by anal endosonography. Br J Radiol 1991; 64: 225-227
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 78 Blatchford GJ, Rivela LJ, Lin K et al. Diagnosing anal sphincter injury with transanal ultrasound and manometry. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 1430-1434
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar