Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1396661
Self-Assessment Questions
Publication History
Publication Date:
29 January 2015 (online)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44c8a/44c8a430216d16905ad74145de0166466acbc3be" alt=""
This section provides a review. Mark each statement on the Answer Sheet according to the factual materials contained in this issue and the opinions of the authors.
Article One (pp. 5–16)
-
Which statement best describes the 5S Framework of intervention?
-
It is a last resort to be utilized only after traditional intervention has failed.
-
It is a balanced intervention approach that can applied to adolescents and young adults struggling with spoken and written language.
-
Working on strategies is the most important element to consider.
-
There is an exact formula for applying the 5S intervention.
-
-
Which statement best characterizes who could benefit from the 5S approach?
-
Adolescents and young adults with language impairment
-
Only children who have not developed spoken communication
-
Younger elementary school-aged children
-
Children who have a specific level of cognitive impairment
-
-
Which elements of therapy can facilitate high levels of student buy-in?
-
Progress monitoring and explicit feedback
-
Counseling
-
Problem-solving discussions
-
All of the above
-
-
Goals to improve underlying language weaknesses refer to which S of the framework?
-
School
-
Student-buy in
-
Skills
-
Strategies
-
-
The challenges of the adolescent and young adult population include
-
motivation and perceptions of self-efficacy
-
rising academic demands
-
frustration from years of struggle
-
all of the above
Article Two (pp. 17–30)
-
-
The following are attributes of effective reading comprehension instruction for typical learners except
-
explicit vocabulary instruction
-
direct and explicit comprehension strategy instruction
-
opportunities for extended discussion of text meaning and interpretation
-
increasing student motivation and engagement in literacy learning
-
independently reading texts and writing answers to content questions
-
-
A comprehension strategy is all the following except
-
a heuristic
-
a detailed, lengthy procedure
-
a short-term, general problemsolving procedure
-
a way of guiding attentional focus
-
a way of highlighting information
-
-
Teaching strategies and learning strategies differ on all the following except
-
a learning strategy is applied independently by the student
-
a learning strategy is scaffolded from teacher control to student control
-
a teaching strategy is an instructional procedure
-
a teaching strategy remains under teacher control
-
graphical organizers are teaching strategies, not learning strategies
-
-
Cognitive modeling involves the instructor
-
reading aloud and stopping to talk about the use of a targeted strategy as it occurs
-
scaffolding use of a strategy from structured activities into subject area reading
-
selecting texts for comprehension instruction that match the strategy being taught
-
showing how the commonality in detail sentences reveal the main idea of a paragraph
-
setting up opportunities for repeated learning, practice, and application of strategies
-
-
Teaching use of a look-back strategy involves all the following except
-
guiding students to judge whether the answer to a text question is in their heads
-
showing how to read each sentence in a likely section for the needed information
-
telling the students that this a special strategy designed for weak readers
-
modeling noticing headings and skimming to look for likely sections of text
-
guiding students to use the lookback strategy in their own study activities
Article Three (pp. 31–41)
-
-
Which of the following morphological forms develops earlier in morphological awareness tasks?
-
The suffix plural -s (inflectional morphology)
-
The suffix -er as in teacher (derivational morphology)
-
The prefix re- as in return (derivational morphology)
-
The suffix -tion as in vacation (derivational morphology)
-
-
In tasks of morphological awareness, relationship transparency is considered opaque when
-
there are no changes phonologically or orthographically between a base word and a derived form (e.g., swim—swimming)
-
there is a shift either phonologically and/or orthographically between a base word and the derived form (e.g., five—fifth)
-
the base word of a derived word is rare or occurs infrequently in a language
-
the base word of a derived word is common or occurs frequently in a language
-
-
How can spelling analysis provide an ideal way to assess morphological awareness?
-
This task allows for the assessment of morphological awareness out of context.
-
This task allows for the assessment of students' reading comprehension abilities.
-
This task is a norm-referenced standardized measure.
-
This task provides insight regarding the application of a morphological awareness strategy in writing production.
-
-
Ideal morphological awareness intervention found to improve language and literacy skills for students with language literacy deficits includes
-
general implicit activities where morphological awareness is mentioned
-
memorization of morphemes and base words
-
gamelike activities where the student is not aware that morphology is the focus
-
explicit activities that require active reflection on morphological word parts and patterns linked to language and literacy contexts
-
-
Morphological links can be made to functional language contexts by
-
drilling morphological patterns
-
linking the focus of morphological awareness to Common Core vocabulary instruction
-
talking about morphological relationships
-
completing word sorts with note cards
Article Four (pp. 42–49)
-
-
In this article, the authors report that students, who struggle with language-based learning disabilities
-
do not have the same educational and career goals as their typical peers
-
are best served by accommodations when they enter college/university settings
-
can benefit substantially from language intervention in their college years
-
should pursue coursework in speech-language pathology
-
-
The “win-win” in this article refers to
-
providing language services to college students while simultaneously training speech-language graduate students
-
providing speech-language graduate students, who have languagebased learning disabilities, with needed intervention
-
encouraging college students with language-based learning disabilities to pursue graduate degrees in speech-language pathology
-
providing language services to students with language-based learning disabilities during their school-age and college years
-
-
The authors seem to suggest that the process of working with speechlanguage graduate students in university language clinics is
-
easy, rewarding and a way to help them learn about practice management and working collaboratively
-
labor intensive, but worthwhile in terms of the depth of knowledge they gain and can use with future clients and transmit to future clinicians
-
important for recruiting undergraduate students into the field of speech-language pathology
-
fun, but not as beneficial as teaching them about literacy through their graduate coursework
-
-
A third potential “win” discussed in this article is
-
the opportunity to collect data and carry out research
-
the opportunity to teach professors across the university about language- based learning disabilities
-
the opportunity to recruit future speech-language pathologists
-
the opportunity to generate more money for university clinics
-
-
In the data reported, the authors found that
-
most of the participants did not struggle with reading comprehension
-
most of the participants who struggled with reading comprehension also had underlying deficits in spoken language comprehension
-
all of the participants had been diagnosed in their school-age years
-
none of the participants had difficulties with word reading and/or spelling
Article Five (pp. 50–59)
-
-
Which language-related domain tends to be a particular area of concern for individuals with Down syndrome?
-
Verbal memory
-
Visual patterning
-
Auditory short term memory
-
Both A and B
-
None of the above
-
-
Individuals with Down syndrome tend to have hearing difficulties with
-
auditory processing
-
sensorineural hearing loss
-
conductive hearing loss
-
B and C
-
none of the above
-
-
Which domain tends to be a strength for adolescents and young adults with Down syndrome?
-
Semantics
-
Reading comprehension
-
Morphosyntax
-
Decoding
-
Phonology
-
-
Which domain tends to be the most impaired for adolescents and young adults with Down syndrome?
-
Semantics
-
Pragmatics
-
Morphosyntax
-
Visual memory
-
Phonology
-
-
Which of the following strategies facilitates oral and written language development for adolescents and young adults with Down syndrome?
-
Modeling
-
Predicting
-
Using recasts
-
Activating prior knowledge
-
All of the above
Article Six (pp. 60–73)
-
-
Which problem is most likely to cause difficulty with complex reading for adolescents with traumatic brain injury?
-
Oculomotor impairment
-
Vestibular impairment
-
Working memory impairment
-
Chronic pain
-
Anxiety
-
-
Which of the following interventions would likely be the most beneficial reading intervention for an adolescent with traumatic brain injury?
-
Repeated oral readings
-
Sight word instruction
-
The Wilson Reading System
-
Metacognitive strategy instruction
-
Text-to-speech software
-
-
Reading and writing difficulties in adolescents after traumatic brain injury are most commonly related to
-
fundamental language impairments
-
decoding difficulties
-
word fluency
-
underlying cognitive impairments
-
phonological impairments
-
-
Intervention for reading and writing difficulties in adolescents after traumatic brain injury should
-
focus on impairment level goals, such as reading word lists
-
be driven by an assessment of the student's abilities and the demands of their environment
-
be based on easily accessible programs available to the clinician or school district
-
ensure that the student no longer requires compensatory supports for success at academic tasks
-
reflect goals set by the clinician that target areas easily tested using normed, standardized assessments
-
-
Which of the following is true of adolescents and adults with traumatic brain injury?
-
Reading continues to be difficult even after intervention for most adolescents and adults with traumatic brain injury across all genres.
-
All learners benefit from audio recordings of books and text.
-
Reading and writing are most important in academic settings, but rarely pose difficulty in work settings.
-
Narrative texts are far more commonly encountered by students and require more elaborate intervention techniques.
-
Individual reading and writing difficulties vary depending on factors such as age.
Article Seven (pp. 74–86)
-
-
What statement best describes the prevalence of speech, language, and communication needs (SLCNs) in mainstream primary and secondary schools in the England?
-
SLCN is the most prevalent special educational need (SEN) in mainstream primary and secondary school in England.
-
The prevalence of SLCNs is consistent across mainstream primary and secondary schools in England.
-
SLCN is the most prevalent SEN in mainstream primary schools in England, and is the fourth most prevalent in mainstream secondary schools in England.
-
SLCN is the most prevalent SEN in mainstream secondary schools and is less prevalent in mainstream primary schools in England.
-
-
The Department for Education in England is introducing the Health and Care Plan in September 2014. The plan
-
replaces the Statement of Special Educational Needs
-
is for pupils with the most severe and complex special educational needs
-
is part of the Special Educational Needs and Disabilities reforms in England
-
all of the above
-
-
Research exploring the trajectories of children with SLCNs over time has shown that
-
a quarter of pupils who started in primary school with SLCNs moved into the category of Behavior Emotional and Social Difficulties in secondary school
-
approximately one-fifth of pupils who fell in the category of SLCNs in primary school moved into the category of moderate learning difficulty or specific learning difficulty in secondary school
-
pupils stayed consistently in their original diagnostic categories across their schooling
-
more than 50% of pupils with SLCNs in primary school moved into a non-SEN category in secondary school
-
-
In the survey by Pring et al (2012) of pediatric speech and language therapists, indirect forms of intervention were seen by speech and language therapists as
-
important to do in conjunction with direct intervention
-
ineffective and not appropriate when working with pupils with SLCNs
-
an excellent form of intervention that therapists wanted to do more of
-
beneficial only when the pupils have severe and complex SLCNs
-
-
The Special Educational Needs and Disability reforms starting in September 2014 include
-
improved ways of working collaboratively between the health, education, and social care settings
-
increased input from service users and greater choice for them
-
an extension of care from 18 to 25 years
-
all of the above
-