PDF herunterladen
Semin Hear 2015; 36(01): 11-28
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1396924
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Acoustic Immittance, Absorbance, and Reflectance in the Human Ear Canal

John J. Rosowski
1   The Eliason Professor of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Laura Ann Wilber
2   Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Frances Searle Building, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
29. Januar 2015 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Ear canal measurements of acoustic immittance (a term that groups impedance and its inverse, admittance) and the related quantities of acoustic reflectance and power absorbance have been used to assess auditory function and aid in the differential diagnosis of conductive hearing loss for over 50 years. The change in such quantities after stimulation of the acoustic reflex also has been used in diagnosis. In this article, we define these quantities, describe how they are commonly measured, and discuss appropriate calibration procedures and standards necessary for accurate immittance/reflectance measurements.

Keywords

Admittance - impedance - immittance - tympanometry - stapes reflex
 

  • References

  • 1 Zwislocki JJ. Some measurements of the impedance at the eardrum. J Acoust Soc Am 1957; 29: 349-356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Zwislocki JJ, Feldman AS. Acoustic impedance of pathological ears. ASHA Monogr 1970; 15: 1-42
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Terkildsen K, Thomsen KA. The influence of pressure variations on the impedance of the human ear drum. A method for objective determination of the middle-ear pressure. J Laryngol Otol 1959; 73: 409-418
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Terkildsen K, Nielsen SS. An electroacoustic impedance measuring bridge for clinical use. Arch Otolaryngol 1960; 72: 339-346
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Keith RW. Impedance audiometry with neonates. Arch Otolaryngol 1973; 97 (6) 465-467
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Keith RW. Middle ear function in neonates. Arch Otolaryngol 1975; 101 (6) 376-379
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Keefe DH, Ling R, Bulen JC. Method to measure acoustic impedance and reflection coefficient. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91 (1) 470-485
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Djupesland G. Middle ear muscle reflexes elicited by acoustic and nonacoustic stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1964; 188 (Suppl): 188 , 287–292
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Djupesland G. Contraction of the Tympanic Muscles in Man (Thesis). Oslo, Norway: Univeritetsforlaget; 1967
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Borg E. A quantitative study of the effect of the acoustic stapedius reflex on sound transmission through the middle ear of man. Acta Otolaryngol 1968; 66 (6) 461-472
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gelfand SA. The acoustic reflex. In: Katz J, Medwetsky L, Burkard R, Hood LJ, , eds. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Philadelphia PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2009: 189-221
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Shahnaz N, Feeney MP, Schairer KS. Wideband acoustic immittance normative data: ethnicity, gender, aging, and instrumentation. Ear Hear 2013; 34 (Suppl. 01) 27S-35S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Stinson MR, Shaw EAG, Lawton BW. Estimation of acoustical energy reflectance at the eardrum from measurements of pressure distribution in the human ear canal. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 72 (3) 766-773
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Keefe DH, Bulen JC, Arehart KH, Burns EM. Ear-canal impedance and reflection coefficient in human infants and adults. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94 (5) 2617-2638
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Rosowski JJ, Stenfelt S, Lilly D. An overview of wideband immittance measurements techniques and terminology: you say absorbance, I say reflectance. Ear Hear 2013; 34 (Suppl. 01) 9S-16S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Farmer-Fedor BL, Rabbitt RD. Acoustic intensity, impedance and reflection coefficient in the human ear canal. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 112 (2) 600-620
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Rabinowitz WM. Measurement of the acoustic input immittance of the human ear. J Acoust Soc Am 1981; 70 (4) 1025-1035
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Voss SE, Stenfelt S, Neely ST, Rosowski JJ. Factors that introduce intrasubject variability into ear-canal absorbance measurements. Ear Hear 2013; 34 (Suppl. 01) 60S-64S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lidén G, Peterson JL, Björkman G. Tympanometry. Arch Otolaryngol 1970; 92 (3) 248-257
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Jerger J. Handbook of Clinical Impedance audiometry. New York, NY: American Electromedics Corporation; 1975
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Feldman AS, Wilber LA. Acoustic Impedance and Admittance—The Measurement of Middle-Ear Function. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1976
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Shanks JE, Lilly DJ. An evaluation of tympanometric estimates of ear canal volume. J Speech Hear Res 1981; 24 (4) 557-566
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Keefe DH, Bulen JC, Campbell SL, Burns EM. Pressure transfer function and absorption cross section from the diffuse field to the human infant ear canal. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95 (1) 355-371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Margolis RH, Paul S, Saly GL, Schachern PA, Keefe DH. Wideband reflectance tympanometry in chinchillas and human. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110 (3 Pt 1): 1453-1464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Sanford CA, Feeney MP. Effects of maturation on tympanometric wideband acoustic transfer functions in human infants. J Acoust Soc Am 2008; 124 (4) 2106-2122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Hunter LL, Prieve BA, Kei J, Sanford CA. Pediatric applications of wideband acoustic immittance measures. Ear Hear 2013; 34 (Suppl. 01) 36S-42S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Prieve BA, Vander Werff KR, Preston JL, Georgantas L. Identification of conductive hearing loss in young infants using tympanometry and wideband reflectance. Ear Hear 2013; 34 (2) 168-178
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Nakajima HH, Pisano DV, Röösli C , et al. Comparison of ear-canal reflectance and umbo velocity in patients with conductive hearing loss: a preliminary study. Ear Hear 2012; 33 (1) 35-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Allen JB, Jeng PS, Levitt H. Evaluation of human middle ear function via an acoustic power assessment. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005; 42 (4) (Suppl. 02) 63-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Feeney MP, Keefe DH. Estimating the acoustic reflex threshold from wideband measures of reflectance, admittance, and power. Ear Hear 2001; 22 (4) 316-332
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Feeney MP, Keefe DH, Marryott LP. Contralateral acoustic reflex thresholds for tonal activators using wideband energy reflectance and admittance. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2003; 46 (1) 128-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Feeney MP, Keefe DH, Sanford CA. Wideband reflectance measures of the ipsilateral acoustic stapedius reflex threshold. Ear Hear 2004; 25 (5) 421-430
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Wever EG, Lawrence M. Physiological Acoustics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1954
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Rabinowitz WM. Acoustic-Reflex Effects on the Input Admittance and Transfer Characteristics of the Human Middle Ear. Ph.D. Thesis. Cambridge MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1977
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Peake WT, Rosowski JJ. Acoustic properties of the middle ear. In: Crocker MJ, , ed. Encyclopedia of Acoustics. New York, NY: Wiley; 1997: 1337-1346
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Arriaga MA, Luxford WM. Impedance audiometry and iatrogenic hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 108 (1) 70-72
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Hunter LL, Ries DT, Schlauch RS, Levine SC, Ward WD. Safety and clinical performance of acoustic reflex tests. Ear Hear 1999; 20 (6) 506-514
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Popelka GR, Dubno JR. Comments on the acoustic-reflex response for bone-conducted signals. Acta Otolaryngol 1978; 86 (1–2) 64-70
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Lilly DJ. Evaluation of the response time of acoustic-immittance instruments. In: Silman S, , ed. The Acoustic Reflex. New York, NY: Academic; 1984
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Rosowski JJ, Peake WT, Lynch III TJ. Acoustic input-admittance of the alligator-lizard ear: nonlinear features. Hear Res 1984; 16 (3) 205-223
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Allen JB. Measurements of eardrum acoustic impedance. In: Allen JB, Hall JH, Hubbard A, Neely ST, Tubis A, , eds. Peripheral Auditory Mechanisms. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1986: 44-51
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Voss SE, Allen JB. Measurement of acoustic impedance and reflectance in the human ear canal. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95 (1) 372-384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Lynch III TJ, Peake WT, Rosowski JJ. Measurements of the acoustic input impedance of cat ears: 10.  Hz to 20 kHz. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96 (4) 2184-2209
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Feeney MP. Editorial: Eriksholm workshop on wideband absorbance measures of the middle ear. Ear Hear 2013; 34 (Suppl. 01) 1S-2S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Egolf DP. Mathematical modeling of a probe-tube microphone. J Acoust Soc Am 1977; 61: 200-205
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Zuercher JC, Carlson EV, Killion MC. Small acoustic tubes: New approximations including isothermal and viscous effects. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 83: 1653-1660
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Lynch III TJ. Signal Processing by the Cat Middle Ear: Admittance and Transmission, Measurements and Models. Cambridge MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1981
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Beranek LL, Mellow TJ. Acoustics: Sound Fields and Transducers. New York, NY: Academic Press; 2012
    Google Scholar