Int J Sports Med 2015; 36(06): 460-465
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1398581
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The Effect of Stress and Recovery on Field-test Performance in Floorball

H. T. D. van der Does
1   University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Human Movement Sciences, Groningen, Netherlands
2   School of Sport Studies, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, Netherlands
,
M. S. Brink
1   University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Human Movement Sciences, Groningen, Netherlands
2   School of Sport Studies, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, Netherlands
,
C. Visscher
1   University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Human Movement Sciences, Groningen, Netherlands
,
B. C. H. Huijgen
1   University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Human Movement Sciences, Groningen, Netherlands
,
W. G. P. Frencken
1   University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Human Movement Sciences, Groningen, Netherlands
2   School of Sport Studies, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, Netherlands
3   Football Club Groningen, Gronigen, Netherlands
,
K. A. P. M. Lemmink
1   University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Human Movement Sciences, Groningen, Netherlands
2   School of Sport Studies, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, Netherlands
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf



accepted after revision 10. Dezember 2014

Publikationsdatum:
03. März 2015 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Physical and psychosocial stress and recovery are important performance determinants. A holistic approach that monitors these performance determinants over a longer period of time is lacking. Therefore this study aims to investigate the effect of a player’s physical and psychosocial stress and recovery on field-test performance. In a prospective non-experimental cohort design 10 female Dutch floorball players were monitored over 6 months. To monitor physical and psychosocial stress and recovery, daily training-logs and 3-weekly the Recovery-Stress Questionnaire for Athletes (RESTQ-Sport) were filled out respectively. To determine field-test performance 6 Heart rate Interval Monitoring System (HIMS) and 4 Repeated Modified Agility T-test (RMAT) measurements were performed. Multilevel prediction models were applied to account for within-players and between-players field-test performance changes. The results show that more psychosocial stress and less psychosocial recovery over 3–6 weeks before testing decrease HIMS performance (p≤0.05). More physical stress over 6 weeks before testing improves RMAT performance (p≤0.05). In conclusion, physical and psychosocial stress and recovery affect submaximal interval-based running performance and agility up to 6 weeks before testing. Therefore both physical and psychosocial stress and recovery should be monitored in daily routines to optimize performance.