Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 19(03): 234-237
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1399794
Original Research
Thieme Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Reflux Laryngitis: Correlation between the Symptoms Findings and Indirect Laryngoscopy

Carlos Eduardo Dilen da Silva
1   Otorhinolaryngology, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
Bruno Taccola Niedermeier
1   Otorhinolaryngology, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
Fernando Portinho
1   Otorhinolaryngology, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

08 September 2014

01 December 2014

Publication Date:
09 January 2015 (online)

Abstract

Introduction The indirect laryngoscopy has an important role in the characterization of reflux laryngitis. Although many findings are nonspecific, some strongly suggest that the inflammation is the cause of reflux.

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between reflux symptoms and the findings of indirect laryngoscopy.

Methods We evaluated 27 patients with symptoms of pharyngolaryngeal reflux disease.

Results Laryngoscopy demonstrated in all patients the presence of hypertrophy of the posterior commissure and laryngeal edema. The most frequent symptoms were the presence of dry cough and foreign body sensation.

Conclusion There was a correlation between the findings at laryngoscopy and symptoms of reflux.

 
  • References

  • 1 Koufman JA, Aviv JE, Casiano RR, Shaw GY. Laryngopharyngeal reflux: position statement of the committee on speech, voice, and swallowing disorders of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 127 (1) 32-35
  • 2 Wang L, Liu X, Liu YL , et al. Correlation of pepsin-measured laryngopharyngeal reflux disease with symptoms and signs. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 143 (6) 765-771
  • 3 Koufman JA, Cummins MM. The prevalence and spectrum of reflux in laryngology: a prospective study of 132 consecutive patients with laryngeal and voice disorders. 1994. Available at: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/trj60d00 . Accessed 8 September 2014
  • 4 Eckley CA, Rios LdaS, Rizzo LV. Salivary egf concentration in adults with reflux chronic laryngitis before and after treatment: preliminary results. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 73 (2) 156-160
  • 5 Koufman JA. The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury. Laryngoscope 1991; 101 (4 Pt 2, Suppl 53): 1-78
  • 6 Nostrant TT. Gastroesophageal reflux and laryngitis: a skeptic's view. Am J Med 2000; 108 (4, Suppl 4a): 149S-152S
  • 7 Eckley CA, Costa HO. Comparative study of salivary pH and volume in adults with chronic laryngopharyngitis by gastroesophageal reflux disease before and after treatment. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 72 (1) 55-60
  • 8 Katz PO. Ambulatory esophageal and hypopharyngeal pH monitoring in patients with hoarseness. Am J Gastroenterol 1990; 85 (1) 38-40
  • 9 Ulualp SO, Toohill RJ, Hoffmann R, Shaker R. Pharyngeal pH monitoring in patients with posterior laryngitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 120 (5) 672-677
  • 10 DeMeester TR, Johnson LF. The evaluation of objective measurements of gastroesophageal reflux and their contribution to patient management. Surg Clin North Am 1976; 56 (1) 39-53
  • 11 Dent J, Dodds WJ, Friedman RH , et al. Mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux in recumbent asymptomatic human subjects. J Clin Invest 1980; 65 (2) 256-267
  • 12 Hirschowitz BI. A critical analysis, with appropriate controls, of gastric acid and pepsin secretion in clinical esophagitis. Gastroenterology 1991; 101 (5) 1149-1158
  • 13 Bumm R, Feussner H, Hölscher AH, Jörg K, Dittler HJ, Siewert JR. Interaction of gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal motility. Evaluation by ambulatory 24-hour manometry and pH-metry. Dig Dis Sci 1992; 37 (8) 1192-1199
  • 14 Fiorucci S, Santucci L, Chiucchiú S, Morelli A. Gastric acidity and gastroesophageal reflux patterns in patients with esophagitis. Gastroenterology 1992; 103 (3) 855-861
  • 15 Smit CF, Tan J, Mathus-Vliegen LM, MathusVliegen LM, Devriesse PP, Brandsen M, Grolman W, Schouwenburg PF. High incidence of gastropharyngeal and gastroesophageal reflux after total laryngectomy. Head Neck 1998; 20 (7) 619-622
  • 16 Shaw GY, Searl JP. Laryngeal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux before and after treatment with omeprazole. South Med J 1997; 90 (11) 1115-1122
  • 17 Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score (RFS). Laryngoscope 2001; 111 (8) 1313-1317
  • 18 Qadeer MA, Swoger J, Milstein C , et al. Correlation between symptoms and laryngeal signs in laryngopharyngeal reflux. Laryngoscope 2005; 115 (11) 1947-1952
  • 19 Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice 2001; 16 (2) 27-47
  • 20 Book DT, Rhee JS, Toohill RJ, Smith TL. Perspectives in laryngopharyngeal reflux: an international survey. Laryngoscope 2002; 112 (8 Pt 1) 1399-1406
  • 21 Ford CN. Evaluation and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux. JAMA 2005; 294 (12) 1534-1540
  • 22 Wendl B, Pfeiffer A, Pehl C, Schmidt T, Kaess H. Effect of decaffeination of coffee or tea on gastroesophageal reflux. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1994; 8 (3) 283-287
  • 23 Martins RHG. Manifestações otorrinolaringológicas relacionadas à doença do refluxo gastroesofágico. Um tema inesgotável!!!. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 73 (2) 14-16
  • 24 Vázquez de la Iglesia F, Fernández González S, Gómez MdeL. Laryngopharyngeal reflux: correlation between symptoms and signs by means of clinical assessment questionnaires and fibroendoscopy. Is this sufficient for diagnosis? . Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2007; 58 (9) 421-425
  • 25 Sataloff RT. Commentary. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 136 (9) 914-915 [doi:10.1001/archoto.2010.145]