Effect of Growth Restriction on Fetal Heart Rate Patterns in the Second Stage of Labor

Abstract

Objective We aimed to estimate the effect of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) on electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) patterns in the second stage of labor.

Study Design We performed a 5-year retrospective cohort study of consecutive singleton, nonanomalous, term gestations. We compared IUGR infants, those with a birth weight less than the 10th percentile, with non-IUGR infants, those greater than or equal to the 10th percentile. Our primary outcome was the EFM patterns in the 30 minutes before delivery. A secondary analysis was performed excluding infants with composite morbidity. Logistic regression was used to adjust for body mass index, race, nulliparity, induction, and protracted labor.

Results Out of the 5,388 infants, 652 (12.1%) were IUGR. IUGR fetuses had less accelerations (29.0 vs. 35.9%, p < 0.01), even among apparently normal infants (29.0 vs. 36.4%, p < 0.01). IUGR fetuses had a higher risk of decelerations, and in all, IUGR accounted for 6% of late decelerations (attributable risk 0.06, 95% confidence interval 0.02–0.10). There was no significant association between IUGR and bradycardia or minimal variability.

Conclusion Growth restriction at term confers an increased risk of late decelerations, even in the absence of neonatal morbidity. EFM patterns may require different interpretations based on a priori risk and clinical factors.

Keywords

fetal monitoring - fetal heart rate - growth restriction - IUGR

Note

Dr. Cahill is a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Physician Faculty Scholar, which supported this work. Data from this study was presented as a poster on February 16, 2013 at the SMFM Annual Meeting (Abstract 748).

• References

• 1 Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114 (1) 192-202
• 2 Baschat AA, Galan HL, Gabbe SG. Intrauterine growth restriction. In Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL, , eds. Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2012: 706-741
• 3 Baschat AA. Fetal responses to placental insufficiency: an update. BJOG 2004; 111 (10) 1031-1041
• 4 Arduini D, Rizzo G, Caforio L, Boccolini MR, Romanini C, Mancuso S. Behavioural state transitions in healthy and growth retarded fetuses. Early Hum Dev 1989; 19 (3) 155-165
• 5 Gagnon R, Hunse C, Bocking AD. Fetal heart rate patterns in the small-for-gestational-age human fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161 (3) 779-784
• 6 Henson G, Dawes GS, Redman CW. Characterization of the reduced heart rate variation in growth-retarded fetuses. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 91 (8) 751-755
• 7 Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, Hauth J, Moore T. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112 (3) 661-666
• 8 Cahill AG, Roehl KA, Odibo AO, Macones GA. Association and prediction of neonatal acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207 (3) 206.e1-206.e8
• 9 Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87 (2) 163-168
• 10 Rizzo G, Capponi A, Pietropolli A, Bufalino LM, Arduini D, Romanini C. Fetal cardiac and extracardiac flows preceding intrauterine death. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994; 4 (2) 139-142
• 11 Nijhuis IJ, ten Hof J, Mulder EJ , et al. Fetal heart rate in relation to its variation in normal and growth retarded fetuses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000; 89 (1) 27-33