Case Volume and Outcomes of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Surgery in Academic Medical Centers

Abstract

Objective The outcome of patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) has not improved in the last decade and surgical repair remains the mainstay of treatment. The purpose of the present study was to assess whether a volume–outcome relationship exists in the U.S. academic medical centers performing surgical repair of neonatal CDH.

Study Design A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of discharge data for neonates undergoing CDH repair in academic medical center members of the University HealthSystem Consortium was employed. Unadjusted mortality was compared between lower and higher surgical volume centers. A binary logistic regression model was fit to test the relationship of surgical volume with mortality.

Results A total of 3,738 patients underwent surgical repair in 122 unique academic medical centers in the United States. The overall rate of survival was 75.2%. There was no difference in unadjusted mortality between lower and higher volume centers. After controlling for patient and hospital variables, there was no difference in the odds of mortality between lower and higher volume centers (odds ratio 1.03 [95% confidence interval, 0.86–1.23, p = 0.730]).

Conclusions Neonates born with congenital diaphragmatic hernia can undergo surgical repair in the U.S. academic medical centers independent of center procedure volume and expect good surgical outcomes.

Keywords

pediatrics - neonatology - congenital diaphragmatic hernia - outcomes - pediatric surgery

• References

• 1 de Buys Roessingh AS, Dinh-Xuan AT. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: current status and review of the literature. Eur J Pediatr 2009; 168 (4) 393-406
• 2 Langham Jr MR, Kays DW, Ledbetter DJ, Frentzen B, Sanford LL, Richards DS. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Epidemiology and outcome. Clin Perinatol 1996; 23 (4) 671-688
• 3 Seetharamaiah R, Younger JG, Bartlett RH, Hirschl RB ; Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group. Factors associated with survival in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a report from the Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group. J Pediatr Surg 2009; 44 (7) 1315-1321
• 4 Tracy ET, Mears SE, Smith PB , et al. Protocolized approach to the management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: benefits of reducing variability in care. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (6) 1343-1348
• 5 Sola JE, Bronson SN, Cheung MC, Ordonez B, Neville HL, Koniaris LG. Survival disparities in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a national perspective. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (6) 1336-1342
• 6 Bucher BT, Guth RM, Saito JM, Najaf T, Warner BW. Impact of hospital volume on in-hospital mortality of infants undergoing repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Ann Surg 2010; 252 (4) 635-642
• 7 Grushka JR, Laberge JM, Puligandla P, Skarsgard ED ; Canadian Pediatric Surgery Network. Effect of hospital case volume on outcome in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: the experience of the Canadian Pediatric Surgery Network. J Pediatr Surg 2009; 44 (5) 873-876
• 8 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. HCUP kids' inpatient database (KID). Healthcare cost and utilization project (HCUP) 2006 and 2009. Available at: www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/kidoverview.jsp . Accessed December 30, 2104
• 9 Mazumdar M, Glassman JR. Categorizing a prognostic variable: review of methods, code for easy implementation and applications to decision-making about cancer treatments. Stat Med 2000; 19 (1) 113-132
• 10 Mazumdar M, Smith A, Bacik J. Methods for categorizing a prognostic variable in a multivariable setting. Stat Med 2003; 22 (4) 559-571
• 11 Muldoon JH. Structure and performance of different DRG classification systems for neonatal medicine. Pediatrics 1999; 103 (1, Suppl E): 302-318
• 12 Checchia PA, McCollegan J, Daher N, Kolovos N, Levy F, Markovitz B. The effect of surgical case volume on outcome after the Norwood procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 129 (4) 754-759
• 13 Hannan EL, Racz M, Kavey RE, Quaegebeur JM, Williams R. Pediatric cardiac surgery: the effect of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality. Pediatrics 1998; 101 (6) 963-969
• 14 Tracy ET, Bennett KM, Danko ME , et al. Low volume is associated with worse patient outcomes for pediatric liver transplant centers. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (1) 108-113
• 15 Smith ER, Butler WE, Barker II FGII. Craniotomy for resection of pediatric brain tumors in the United States, 1988 to 2000: effects of provider caseloads and progressive centralization and specialization of care. Neurosurgery 2004; 54 (3) 553-563 , discussion 563–565
• 16 Ayanian JZ, Weissman JS. Teaching hospitals and quality of care: a review of the literature. Milbank Q 2002; 80 (3) 569-593 , v
• 17 Allison JJ, Kiefe CI, Weissman NW , et al. Relationship of hospital teaching status with quality of care and mortality for Medicare patients with acute MI. JAMA 2000; 284 (10) 1256-1262
• 18 Dimick JB, Cowan Jr JA, Colletti LM, Upchurch Jr GR. Hospital teaching status and outcomes of complex surgical procedures in the United States. Arch Surg 2004; 139 (2) 137-141
• 19 Meguid RA, Brooke BS, Chang DC, Sherwood JT, Brock MV, Yang SC. Are surgical outcomes for lung cancer resections improved at teaching hospitals?. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 85 (3) 1015-1024 , discussion 1024–1025
• 20 Thornlow DK, Stukenborg GJ. The association between hospital characteristics and rates of preventable complications and adverse events. Med Care 2006; 44 (3) 265-269
• 21 Shahian DM, Nordberg P, Meyer GS , et al. Contemporary performance of U.S. teaching and nonteaching hospitals. Acad Med 2012; 87 (6) 701-708
• 22 Antonoff MB, Hustead VA, Groth SS, Schmeling DJ. Protocolized management of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: effect on survival. J Pediatr Surg 2011; 46 (1) 39-46