J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31(05): 348-354
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1546421
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Impact of Specialty Training on the Association between Flap Size and Incidence of Complications following Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstruction for Cancer

Anaeze C. Offodile II
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts
,
Andrew S. Aherrera
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts
,
Julia Wenger
2   Department of Nephrology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Thomas Tsai
3   Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Dennis P. Orgill
3   Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Lifei Guo
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

02. Oktober 2014

20. Dezember 2014

Publikationsdatum:
13. März 2015 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Background The scope of otolaryngology and plastic surgery overlap within head and neck reconstruction is increasing; yet comparative outcome studies between these two subspecialties are limited.

Methods A retrospective review was performed on all patients who underwent microvascular reconstruction of a postablative head and neck defect at a quaternary academic medical center between January 2000 and October 2011. Postoperative outcomes were reviewed by subspecialty and Mann–Whitney analysis was used to investigate any flap size differences between cohorts with and without complications.

Results A consecutive series of 129 (66.8%) otolaryngology cases and 64 (33.2%) plastic surgery cases comprised the entire study sample. Plastic surgery flaps were significantly larger than otolaryngology flaps (9.7 vs. 8.5 cm, p = 0.004). Flap complication rates (31.8 vs. 37.5%, p = 0.429) and flap failure rates (5.4 vs. 4.7%, p = 0.429) were comparable between subspecialties. However, a significant difference in flap size was evident between the cohorts with and without flap complications following microvascular reconstruction by otolaryngology (9.18 vs. 8.15 cm, p = 0.042). This difference was not detected following reconstruction by plastic surgery (9.34 vs. 9.04 cm, p = 0.225). For the overall sample, there was a correlation between increasing flap size and higher tumor stages (significant at T4, p = 0.003) as well as advanced T-stage and medical complications (p = 0.004).

Conclusion Plastic surgeons should maintain an active role in the reconstruction of complex, microvascular head and neck cases such as those that require larger flaps and/or of advanced T-stages.