Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2015; 36(10): 822-825
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1549857
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Are the Beneficial Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning on Performance Partly a Placebo Effect?

M. Marocolo
1   Human Performance and Sport Research Group, Department of Sport Sciences, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Brazil
2   Physiology & Anatomy, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany
,
G. R. da Mota
1   Human Performance and Sport Research Group, Department of Sport Sciences, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Brazil
,
V. Pelegrini
1   Human Performance and Sport Research Group, Department of Sport Sciences, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Brazil
,
H.-J. Appell Coriolano
2   Physiology & Anatomy, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 24 March 2015

Publication Date:
09 June 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The acute effect of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) on the maximal performance in the 100-m freestyle event was studied in recreational swimmers. 15 swimmers (21.0±3.2 years) participated in a random crossover model on 3 different days (control [CON], IPC or SHAM), separated by 3–5 days. IPC consisted of 4 cycles of 5-min occlusion (220 mmHg)/5-min reperfusion in each arm, and the SHAM protocol was similar to IPC but with only 20 mmHg during the occlusion phase. The subjects were informed that both maneuvers (IPC and SHAM) would improve their performance. After IPC, CON or SHAM, the volunteers performed a maximal 100-m time trial. IPC improved performance (p=0.036) compared to CON. SHAM performance was only better than CON (p=0.059) as a tendency but did not differ from IPC performance. The individual response of the subjects to the different maneuvers was very heterogeneous. We conclude that IPC may improve performance in recreational swimmers, but this improvement could mainly be a placebo effect.

Key words

blood flow occlusion - swimming - skeletal muscle
 

  • References

  • 1 Bailey TG, Jones H, Gregson W, Atkinson G, Cable NT, Thijssen DH. Effect of ischemic preconditioning on lactate accumulation and running performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012; 44: 2084-2089
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Beaven CM, Cook CJ, Kilduff L, Drawer S, Gill N. Intermittent lower-limb occlusion enhances recovery after strenuous exercise. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2012; 37: 1132-1139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Chollet D, Seifert L, Leblanc H, Boulesteix L, Carter M. Evaluation of arm-leg coordination in flat breaststroke. Int J Sports Med 2004; 25: 486-495
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Clevidence MW, Mowery RE, Kushnick MR. The effects of ischemic preconditioning on aerobic and anaerobic variables associated with submaximal cycling performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 2012; 112: 3649-3654
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cochrane DJ, Booker HR, Mundel T, Barnes MJ. Does intermittent pneumatic leg compression enhance muscle recovery after strenuous eccentric exercise?. Int J Sports Med 2013; 34: 969-974
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Crisafulli A, Tangianu F, Tocco F, Concu A, Mameli O, Mulliri G, Caria MA. Ischemic preconditioning of the muscle improves maximal exercise performance but not maximal oxygen uptake in humans. J Appl Physiol 2011; 111: 530-536
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 de Groot PC, Thijssen DH, Sanchez M, Ellenkamp R, Hopman MT. Ischemic preconditioning improves maximal performance in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 2010; 108: 141-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Deschodt VJ, Arsac LM, Rouard AH. Relative contribution of arms and legs in humans to propulsion in 25-m sprint front-crawl swimming. Eur J Appl Physiol 1999; 80: 192-199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Figueiredo P, Sanders R, Gorski T, Vilas-Boas JP, Fernandes RJ. Kinematic and electromyographic changes during 200 m front crawl at race pace. Int J Sports Med 2013; 34: 49-55
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Gibson N, Mahony B, Tracey C, Fawkner S, Murray A. Effect of ischemic preconditioning on repeated sprint ability in team sport athletes. J Sports Sci 2014; DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2014.988741.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gibson N, White J, Neish M, Murray A. Effect of ischemic preconditioning on land based sprinting in team sport athletes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2013; 8: 671-676
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2014 update. Int J Sports Med 2013; 34: 1025-1028
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hollander AP, De Groot G, van Ingen Schenau GJ, Toussaint HM, De Best H, Peeters W, Meulemans A, Schreurs AW. Measurement of active drag during crawl arm stroke swimming. J Sports Sci 1986; 4: 21-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ikuta Y, Matsuda Y, Yamada Y, Kida N, Oda S, Moritani T. Relationship between decreased swimming velocity and muscle activity during 200-m front crawl. Eur J Appl Physiol 2012; 112: 3417-3429
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Jean-St-Michel E, Manlhiot C, Li J, Tropak M, Michelsen MM, Schmidt MR, McCrindle BW, Wells GD, Redington AN. Remote preconditioning improves maximal performance in highly trained athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43: 1280-1286
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lalonde F, Curnier DY. Can anaerobic performance be improved by remote ischemic preconditioning?. J Strength Cond Res 2015; 29: 80-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Libonati JR, Cox M, Incanno N, Melville SK, Musante FC, Glassberg HL, Guazzi M. Brief periods of occlusion and reperfusion increase skeletal muscle force output in humans. Cardiologia 1998; 43: 1355-1360
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Morouco P, Keskinen KL, Vilas-Boas JP, Fernandes RJ. Relationship between tethered forces and the four swimming techniques performance. J Appl Biomech 2011; 27: 161-169
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Murry CE, Jennings RB, Reimer KA. Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation 1986; 74: 1124-1136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Paixao RC, da Mota GR, Marocolo M. Acute effect of ischemic preconditioning is detrimental to anaerobic performance in cyclists. Int J Sports Med 2014; 35: 912-915
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Patterson SD, Bezodis NE, Glaister M, Pattison JR. The effect of ischemic preconditioning on repeated sprint cycling performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2014; DOI: 10.1249/MSS.000000000000576.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Stirn I, Jarm T, Kapus V, Strojnik V. Evaluation of muscle fatigue during 100-m front crawl. Eur J Appl Physiol 2011; 111: 101-113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Tocco F, Marongiu E, Ghiani G, Sanna I, Palazzolo G, Olla S, Pusceddu M, Sanna P, Corona F, Concu A, Crisafulli A. Muscle ischemic preconditioning does not improve performance during self-paced exercise. Int J Sports Med 2015; 36: 9-15
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar