Therapieentscheidung bei Klasse-I-Borderline-Fällen: Extraktion versus Non-Extraktion

A. Kompacher; B. Wendl; M. Pichelmayer; F. Weiland

doi:10.1055/s-0035-1550004

Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie, Table of Contents

Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2015; 47(02): 80-85
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1550004

Übersichtsartikel

Therapieentscheidung bei Klasse-I-Borderline-Fällen: Extraktion versus Non-Extraktion

Therapeutic Decision in Class I Borderline Cases: Extraction vs. Non-Extraction

Authors

A. Kompacher

¹Klin. Abteilung für Kieferorthopädie, Universitätsklinik für Zahn-, Mund-, und Kieferheilkunde Graz, Österreich
B. Wendl

¹Klin. Abteilung für Kieferorthopädie, Universitätsklinik für Zahn-, Mund-, und Kieferheilkunde Graz, Österreich
M. Pichelmayer

¹Klin. Abteilung für Kieferorthopädie, Universitätsklinik für Zahn-, Mund-, und Kieferheilkunde Graz, Österreich
F. Weiland

¹Klin. Abteilung für Kieferorthopädie, Universitätsklinik für Zahn-, Mund-, und Kieferheilkunde Graz, Österreich

Abstract

Zusammenfassung

Die Entscheidung zur Extraktionstherapie bei Klasse-I-Grenzfällen ist oft sehr schwierig zu treffen bzw. wird von verschiedenen Faktoren beeinflusst.

In dieser Arbeit werden mittels Literaturrecherche unterschiedliche Aspekte zur Extraktionstherapie dargestellt. Dabei werden die häufigsten Extraktionsgründe und Extraktionsmuster, das Auftreten von Wurzelresorptionen, Behandlungserfolge, Zahnbogenveränderungen sowie der Einfluss einer Extraktionstherapie auf die Dauer der Behandlung, der Kondylenposition, mögliche Profil- und Weichteilveränderungen diskutiert. Auch der Zusammenhang zwischen Extraktionstherapie und der Impaktierung von Weisheitszähnen, der Stabilität und des Auftretens eines Frontzahnrezidivs wird erläutert.

Abstract

The decision for an extraction treatment in Class I borderline cases is sometimes difficult and is influenced by many factors.

In this review article different aspects of extraction treatment are presented. The most frequent reasons will be discussed, as well as the occurrence of root resorptions, success of treatment, dental arch changes, influence of extraction on the duration of orthodontic treatment, condylar position and effects on profile and soft tissue changes. Moreover the relation between extraction treatment and third molar impaction rate, stability and the tendency of incisor relapse is explained.

Schlüsselwörter

Klasse I - Extraktionstherapie

Key words

Class I - extraction treatment

Full Text

References

Literatur
1 Verma SL, Sharma VP, Tandon P et al. Comparison of esthetic outcome after extraction or non-extraction orthodontic treatment in class II division 1 malocclusion patients. Contemp Clin Dent 2013; 4: 206-212
2 Carey CW. Diagnosis and case analysis in orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1952; 38: 149-161
3 Xu TM, Liu Y, Yang MZ et al. Comparison of extraction versus nonextraction orthodontic treatment outcomes for borderline Chinese patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129: 672-677
4 Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Orthodontic treatment planning: From problem list to specific plan, in Contemporary Orthodontics. 5^th ed. Mosby; St. Louis: 2012. 220-275
5 Baumrind S, Korn EL, Boyd R et al. The decision to extract: Part 1-Interclinician agreement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 109: 297-309
6 Angle EH. Treatment of malocclusion of the teeth and fractures of the maxilla, Angle’s system. 7th ed. Philadelphia: SS White Dental Mfg.Co.; 1907
7 Proffit WR. Forty-year review of extraction frequencies at a university orthodontic clinic. Angle Orthod 1994; 64: 407-414
8 Peck S, Peck H. Frequency of tooth extraction in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1979; 76: 491-496
9 Weintraub JA, Vig PS, Brown C et al. The prevalence of orthodontic extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 96: 462-466
10 Turpin DL. Percentage swings in extraction frequencies. Angle Orthod 1994; 64: 403
11 Baumrind S, Korn EL, Boyd R et al. The decision to extract: Part II. Analysis of clinicians stated reason for extraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 109: 393-402
12 Konstantonis D, Anthopoulou C, Makou M. Extraction decision and identification of treatment predictors in Class I malocclusions. Progr Orthod 2013; 14: 47
13 Fleischer-Peters A. Therapieplanung bei Engstand unter Berücksichtigung der Wachstumssituation. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1980; 41: 385-393
14 Björk A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Orthod 1969; 55: 585-599
15 Hirschfelder U, Boulouchou O, Müssig D et al. Einfluß des Wachstumstyps auf das Behandlungsresultat nach Extraktionstherapie. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1997; 58: 154-164
16 Lin CH, Short LL, Banding DW. The effects of non-extraction treatment on the vertical dimension: a comparison of a dolichofacial and a mesofacial group. Aust Orthod J 2012; 28: 37-43
17 Kumari M, Fida M. Vertical facial and dental arch dimensional changes in extraction vs. non-extraction orthodontic treatment. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2010; 20: 17-21
18 Janson G, Maria FR, Bombonatti R. Frequency evaluation of different extraction protocols in orthodontic treatment during 35 years. Prog Orthod 2014; 15: 51
19 Mavreas D, Athanasiou AE. Factors affecting the duration of orthodontic treatment: a systemic review. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30: 386-395
20 Leon-Salazar R, Janson G, Henriques JFC et al. Influence of initial occlusal severity on time and efficiency of Class I malocclusion treatment carried out with and without premolar extractions. Dental Press J Orthod 2014; 19: 38-49
21 Jung YH, Cho BH. External root resorption after orthodontic treatment: a study of contributing factors. Imaging Science in Dentistry 2011; 41: 17-21
22 Linge L, Linge BO. Patient characteristics and treatment variables associated with apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 99: 35-43
23 Sharpe W, Reed B, Subtelny JD et al. Orthodontic relapse, apical root resorption, and crestal alveolar bone levels. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987; 91: 252-258
24 Ileri Z, Basciftci FA, Malkoc S et al. Comparison of the outcomes of the lower incisor extraction, premolar extraction and non-extraction treatments. Eur J Orthod 2012; 681-685
25 Freitas KM, Freitas DS, Valarelli FP et al. PAR evaluation of treated Class I extraction patients. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 270-274
26 Janson G, Nakamura A, Barros SE et al. Efficiency of Class I and Class II malocclusion treatment with four premolar extractions. Journal of Applied Oral Science [online]
27 Artun J, Osterberg SK. Periodontal status of teeth facing extraction sites long-term after orthodontic treatment. J Periodontol 1987; 58: 24-29
28 Türköz Ç, Ulusoy Ç. Effect of premolar extraction on mandibular third molar impaction in young adults. Angle Orthod 2013; 83: 572-577
29 Kim TW, Årtun J, Behbehani F et al. Prevalence of third molar impaction in orthodontic patients treated nonextraction and with extracton of 4 premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123: 138-145
30 Tarazona B, Parades V, Llamas JM et al. Influence of first and second premolar extraction or non-extraction treatments on mandibular third molar angulation and position. A comparative study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010; 15: e760-e766
31 Gianelly AA, Cozzani M, Boffa J. Condylar position and maxillary first premolar extraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 99: 473-476
32 Årtun J, Hollender LG, Truelove EL. Relationship between orthodontic treatment, condylar position, and internal derangement in the temporomandibular joint. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992; 101: 48-53
33 Major P, Kamelchuk L, Nebbe B et al. Condyle displacement associated with premolar extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment of class I malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997; 112: 435-440
34 Rinchuse DJ, Busch LS, DiBagno D et al. Extraction Treatment Part1 The Extraction vs. Nonextraction debate. J Clin Orthod 2014; 48: 753-760
35 Dibbets JMH, van der Weele LT. Extraction, orthodontic treatment, and craniomandibular dysfunction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 99: 210-219
36 Basciftci FA, Usumez S. Effects of Extraction and Nonextraction Treatment on Class I and Class II Subjects. Angle Orthod 2003; 73: 36-42
37 Stephens CK, Boley JC, Behrents RG et al. Long-term profile changes in extraction and nonextraction patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128: 450-457
38 Conley RS, Jernigan C. Soft tissue changes after upper premolar extraction in Class II camouflage therapy. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 59-65
39 Erdinc AE, Nanda RS, Dandajena TC. Profile changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132: 324-331
40 Paquette DE, Beattie JR, Johnston LE. A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in „borderline“ class II patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992; 102: 1-14
41 Bowman SJ, Johnston LE. The esthetic impact of extraction and nonextraction treatment on Caucasian patients. Angle Orthod 2000; 70: 3-10
42 Konstantonis D. The impact of extraction vs. nonextraction on soft tissue changes in Class I borderline malocclusions. Angle Orthod 2012; 82: 209-217
43 Johnson DK, Smith R. Smile esthetics after orthodontic treatment with and without extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995; 108: 162-167
44 Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. The gingival smile line. Angle Orthod 1992; 62: 91-100
45 Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. Some vertical lineaments of lip positon. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992; 101: 519-524
46 Mack MR. Vertical dimension: a dynamic concept based on facial form and oropharyngeal function. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66: 478-485
47 Hulsey CM. An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile. Am J Orthod 1970; 57: 132-144
48 Aksu M, Kocadereli I. Arch width changes in extraction and nonextraction treatment in class I patients. Angle Orthod 2005; 75: 948-952
49 Strang R. The fallacy of denture expansion. Angle Orthod 1949; 19: 12-17
50 Riedel RA. Review of the retention problem. Angle Orthod 1960; 6: 179-199
51 Weinberg M, Sadowsky C. Resolution of mandibular arch crowding in growing patients with Class I malocclusions treated nonextraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 110: 359-364
52 Glenn G, Sinclair PM, Alexander RG. Nonextraction orthodontic therapy: posttreatment dental and skeletal stability. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987; 92: 321-328
53 Boley JC, Mark JA, Sachdeva RC et al. Longterm stability of Class I premolar extraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124: 277-287
54 Picanço PR, Valarelli FP, Cançado RH et al. Comparison of the changes of alveolar bone thickness in maxillary incisor area in extraction and non-extraction cases: computerized tomography evaluation. Dental Press J Orthod 2013; 18: 91-98
55 Germec-Cakan D, Taner TU, Akan S. Arch-width and perimeter changes in patients with borderline class I malocclusion treated with extraction or without extraction with air-rotor stripping. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 734.e1-734.e7
56 Little RM, Wallen TR, Riedel RA. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment-first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1981; 80: 349-365
57 Little RM, Riedel RA, Årtun J. An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years postretention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988; 93: 423-428
58 Little RM, Riedel RA, Engst ED. Serial extraction of first premolars – postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod 1990; 60: 255-262
59 Little RM, Riedel RA, Stein A. Mandibular arch length increase in the mixed dentition: postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990; 97: 393-404
60 Zafarmand AH, Qamari A, Zafarmand MM. Mandibular incisor re-crowding: is it different in extraction and non-extraction cases?. Oral Health Dent Manag 2014; 13: 669-674
61 Freitas KM, des Freitas MR, Henriques JF et al. Postretention relapse of mandibular anterior crowding in patients treated without mandibular premolar extraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 125: 480-487
62 Canuto LFG, Freitas MR, Freitas KMS et al. Long-term stability of maxillary anterior alignment in non-extraction cases. Dental Press J Orthod 2013; 18: 46-53
63 Canuto LF, de Freitas MR, Janson G et al. Influence of rapid expansion on maxillary incisor alignment stability. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 164.e1-164.e6