Download PDF
Journal of Pediatric Neurology 2015; 13(01): 003-007
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1555144
Review Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The History of Pseudotumor Cerebri Syndrome among “Courses” and “Recourses”

Martino Ruggieri
1   Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
,
Vincenzo Salpietro
2   Department of Pediatric Neurology, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
3   Department of Pediatrics, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
,
Conrad E. Johanson
4   Department of Neurosurgery, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

29 November 2014

03 February 2015

Publication Date:
13 July 2015 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The terms “pseudotumor cerebri” and “benign intracranial hypertension,” respectively, introduced by Nonne in 1904 and Foley in 1955, were originally used to describe patients with raised intracranial pressure in whom no tumor was found and whose course was considered to be relatively benign. In the modern era of medicine, the natural history of this condition has proved to be not always benign, as some patients with “benign intracranial hypertension” developed permanent blindness. Therefore, Buchheit in 1969 challenged the terms “benign” and “pseudotumor” and the denomination was then changed to “idiopathic intracranial hypertension.” The recently updated diagnostic criteria for this syndrome reintroduced the original terminology and proposed to define the condition as “pseudotumor cerebri syndrome.” The aim of this umbrella term is to encompass all the potential etiologies, primary and secondary, of increased intracranial pressure not associated with intracranial mass and/or anomalies of the brain parenchyma. In this article, we briefly review the history of pseudotumor cerebri syndrome.

Keywords

idiopathic intracranial hypertension - pseudotumor cerebri - history
 

  • References

  • 1 Friedman DI, Liu GT, Digre KB. Revised diagnostic criteria for the pseudotumor cerebri syndrome in adults and children. Neurology 2013; 81 (13) 1159-1165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Peng KP, Fuh JL, Wang SJ. High-pressure headaches: idiopathic intracranial hypertension and its mimics. Nat Rev Neurol 2012; 8 (12) 700-710
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Nonne M. “Ü ber falle vom symptomkomplex “tumor cerebri” mit ausgang in heilung (pseudotumor cerebri). Dtsch Z Nervenheilkd 1904; 27: 169-216
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Foley J. Benign forms of intracranial hypertension; toxic and otitic hydrocephalus. Brain 1955; 78 (1) 1-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Buchheit WA, Burton C, Haag B, Shaw D. Papilledema and idiopathic intracranial hypertension. N Engl J Med 1969; 280 (17) 938-942
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Lepore FE. Toward a definition of papilledema: a historical review, 1851-1911. Surg Neurol 1982; 17 (3) 178-180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Quincke HI. Die technik der lumbalpunktion. Verh Dtsch Ges Inn Med 1891; 10: 321-331
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Johnston I. The historical development of the pseudotumor concept. Neurosurg Focus 2001; 11 (2) E2
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Pearce JM. From pseudotumour cerebri to idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Pract Neurol 2009; 9 (6) 353-356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hughlings J. Discussion on the relation between optic neuritis and intracranial disease. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K 1880– 1881; (1) 60-115
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Taylor J. Diseases of the optic nerve. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K 1894; (14) 105-119
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Gowers WR. Optic neuritis in chlorosis. BMJ 1881; 1 (1064) 796-797
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Williamson RT, Roberts E. Remarks on the diagnosis and prognosis in 100 cases of double optic neuritis with headache. Lancet 1900; (1) 1350-1352
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Broadbent WH. On the causation and significance of the choked disc in intracranial diseases. BMJ 1872; 1 (598) 633-635
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Broadbent ME. London: John Murray; 1909
  • 16 Quincke H. Meningitis serosa. Sammi Klin Vortr, Leipzig, No 67. Inn Med 1893; 23: 655-662
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Quincke H. Ueber Meningitis serosa und verwande Zustande. Dtsch Z Nervenheilkd 1897; 9: 149-168
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Pearce JMS. Fragments of neurological history. London: Imperial College Press; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Nonne M. Über fälle vom symptomenkomplex “tumor cerebri” mit ausgang in heilung (pseudotumor cerebri). Ü ber letal verlaufene fälle von “pseudotumor cerebri” mit sektionsbefund. J Neurol 1904; 27 (3–4) 169-216
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Symonds CP. Otitic hydrocephalus. Brain 1931; 54 (1) 55-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Davidoff LM, Dyke CG. Hypertensive meningeal hydrops: syndrome frequently following infection in the middle ear or elsewhere in the body. Am J Ophthalmol 1937; 20 (9) 908-927
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Dandy WE. Intracranial pressure without brain tumor: diagnosis and treatment. Ann Surg 1937; 106 (4) 492-513
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Spennato P, Ruggiero C, Parlato RS , et al. Pseudotumor cerebri. Childs Nerv Syst 2011; 27 (2) 215-235
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Thomas WA. Generalised edema occurring only at the menstrual period. JAMA 1933; (101) 1126-1127
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Joynt RJ, Sahs AL. Brain swelling of unknown cause. Neurology 1956; 6 (11) 801-803
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Salpietro V, Polizzi A, Di Rosa G , et al. Adrenal disorders and the paediatric brain: pathophysiological considerations and clinical implications. Int J Endocrinol 2014; 2014: 282489
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Salpietro V, Ruggieri M. Pseudotumor cerebri pathophysiology: the likely role of aldosterone. Headache 2014; 54 (7) 1229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Sheldon CA, Kwon YJ, Liu GT, McCormack SE. An integrated mechanism of pediatric pseudotumor cerebri syndrome: evidence of bioenergetic and hormonal regulation of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. Pediatr Res 2015; 77 (2) 282-289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar