Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1557819
Sonographic Assessment of the Umbilical Cord
Sonografie der NabelschnurPublication History
received 13 April 2015
revised 30 May 2015
accepted 03 June 2015
Publication Date:
31 August 2015 (online)
Abstract
The umbilical cord (UC) is a vital connection between fetus and placenta. It constitutes a stable connection to the fetomaternal interface, while allowing the fetal mobility that is of great importance for fetal development in general and fetal neuromotor development in particular. This combination of mechanical stability and flexibility is due to the architecture of the UC. There is however a range of umbilical cord complications that may be life threatening to the fetus and these too can be explained to a large extent by the cordʼs structural characteristics. This review article discusses clinically relevant aspects of UC ultrasound.
Zusammenfassung
Die Nabelschnur ist die lebenswichtige Verbindung zwischen Fetus und Plazenta. Sie bildet einerseits eine stabile Verbindung zur zentralen Einheit des fetomaternalen Stoffwechsels und ermöglicht dem Feten andererseits eine Beweglichkeit, die für die körperliche – insbesondere die neuromotorische – Entwicklung von großer Bedeutung ist. Diese Kombination aus mechanischer Stabilität und Flexibilität begründet sich in der Architektur der Nabelschnur. Es gibt jedoch eine Reihe an Nabelschnurkomplikationen, die den Feten z. T. lebensbedrohlich gefährden können. Auch diese lassen sich vor allem auf die strukturellen Eigenschaften der Nabelschnur zurückführen. Im Rahmen einer Übersichtsarbeit werden klinisch relevante Aspekte der sonografischen Diagnostik der Nabelschnur besprochen.
-
References
- 1 Ferguson VL, Dodson RB. Bioengineering aspects of the umbilical cord. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009; 144 (Suppl. 01) S108-S113
- 2 Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E et al. Sonographic measurement of the umbilical cord and fetal anthropometric parameters. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999; 83: 131-135
- 3 Gordon Z, Eytan O, Jaffa AJ et al. Hemodynamic analysis of Hyrtl anastomosis in human placenta. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2007; 292: R977-R982
- 4 Bhutia KL, Sengupta R, Upreti B et al. Pregnancy-induced hypertension is associated with altered anatomical patterns of Hyrtlʼs anastomosis. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2014; 297: 819-825
- 5 Raio L, Ghezzi F, di Naro E et al. In-utero characterization of the blood flow in the Hyrtl anastomosis. Placenta 2001; 22: 597-601
- 6 Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E et al. Prenatal assessment of the Hyrtl anastomosis and evaluation of its function: case report. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 1890-1893
- 7 Strong jr. TH, Jarles DL, Vega JS et al. The umbilical coiling index. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 29-32
- 8 Mittal A, Nanda S, Sen J. Antenatal umbilical coiling index as a predictor of perinatal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015; 291: 763-768
- 9 Narayan R, Saaid R, Pedersen L et al. Ultrasound assessment of umbilical cord morphology in the first trimester: a feasibility study. Fetal Diagn Ther 2015; [Epub ahead of print]
- 10 Verkleij CP, van Oppen AC, Mulder EJ et al. Evaluation of antenatal umbilical coiling index at 16–21 weeks of gestation as a predictor of trisomy 21 and other chromosomal defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 545-552
- 11 Moshiri M, Zaidi SF, Robinson TJ et al. Comprehensive imaging review of abnormalities of the umbilical cord. Radiographics 2014; 34: 179-196
- 12 Jessop FA, Lees CC, Pathak S et al. Umbilical cord coiling: clinical outcomes in an unselected population and systematic review. Virchows Arch 2014; 464: 105-112
- 13 Rayburn WF, Beynen A, Brinkman DL. Umbilical cord length and intrapartum complications. Obstet Gynecol 1981; 57: 450-452
- 14 Hill LM, DiNofrio DM, Guzick D. Sonographic determination of first trimester umbilical cord length. J Clin Ultrasound 1994; 22: 435-438
- 15 Murphy A, Platt LD. First-trimester diagnosis of body stalk anomaly using 2- and 3-dimensional sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2011; 30: 1739-1743
- 16 Prefumo F, Izzi C. Fetal abdominal wall defects. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 28: 391-402
- 17 Smrcek JM, Germer U, Krokowski M et al. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and management of body stalk anomaly: analysis of nine singleton and two multiple pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 322-328
- 18 Ugurlucan FG, Yuksel A. Is complete umbilical cord scanning possible at the second-trimester ultrasound scan?. J Clin Ultrasound 2014;
- 19 Hasegawa J, Matsuoka R, Ichizuka K et al. Ultrasound diagnosis and management of umbilical cord abnormalities. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 48: 23-27
- 20 Oyelese Y, Catanzarite V, Prefumo F et al. Vasa previa: the impact of prenatal diagnosis on outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 937-942
- 21 Rao KP, Belogolovkin V, Yankowitz J et al. Abnormal placentation: evidence-based diagnosis and management of placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2012; 67: 503-519
- 22 Oyelese Y, Smulian JC. Placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 927-941
- 23 Gagnon R, Morin L, Bly S et al. SOGC CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE: guidelines for the management of vasa previa. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2010; 108: 85-89
- 24 Ruiter L, Kok N, Limpens J et al. Systematic review of accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of vasa previa. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45: 516-522
- 25 Rebarber A, Dolin C, Fox NS et al. Natural history of vasa previa across gestation using a screening protocol. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33: 141-147
- 26 Mastroiacovo P, Lisi A, Castilla EE et al. Gastroschisis and associated defects: an international study. Am J Med Genet A 2007; 143A: 660-671
- 27 Bonilla jr. F, Raga F, Villalaiz E et al. Umbilical cord cysts: evaluation with different 3-dimensional sonographic modes. J Ultrasound Med 2010; 29: 281-285
- 28 Zangen R, Boldes R, Yaffe H et al. Umbilical cord cysts in the second and third trimesters: significance and prenatal approach. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36: 296-301
- 29 Hannaford K, Reeves S, Wegner E. Umbilical cord cysts in the first trimester: are they associated with pregnancy complications?. J Ultrasound Med 2013; 32: 801-806
- 30 Avnet H, Shen O, Mazaki E et al. Four-vessel umbilical cord. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38: 604-606
- 31 Voskamp BJ, Fleurke-Rozema H, Oude-Rengerink K et al. Relationship of isolated single umbilical artery to fetal growth, aneuploidy and perinatal mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 622-628
- 32 Sepulveda W, Peek MJ, Hassan J et al. Umbilical vein to artery ratio in fetuses with single umbilical artery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8: 23-26
- 33 Dagklis T, Defigueiredo D, Staboulidou I et al. Isolated single umbilical artery and fetal karyotype. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36: 291-295
- 34 Mailath-Pokorny M, Worda K, Schmid M et al. Isolated single umbilical artery: evaluating the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015; 184: 80-83
- 35 Chaoui R, Heling KS, Karl K. Ultrasound of the fetal veins part 1: the intrahepatic venous system. Ultraschall Med 2014; 35: 208-228
- 36 Weichert J, Hartge D, Germer U et al. Persistent right umbilical vein: a prenatal condition worth mentioning?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 543-548
- 37 Lee SW, Kim MY, Kim JE et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of antenatal fetal intra-abdominal umbilical vein varix detection. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2014; 57: 181-186
- 38 Allen SL, Bagnall C, Roberts AB et al. Thrombosing umbilical vein varix. J Ultrasound Med 1998; 17: 189-192
- 39 Sepulveda W, Mackenna A, Sanchez J et al. Fetal prognosis in varix of the intrafetal umbilical vein. J Ultrasound Med 1998; 17: 171-175
- 40 Byers BD, Goharkhay N, Mateus J et al. Pregnancy outcome after ultrasound diagnosis of fetal intra-abdominal umbilical vein varix. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 282-286
- 41 Zalel Y, Lehavi O, Heifetz S et al. Varix of the fetal intra-abdominal umbilical vein: prenatal sonographic diagnosis and suggested in utero management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 476-478
- 42 Valsky DV, Rosenak D, Hochner-Celnikier D et al. Adverse outcome of isolated fetal intra-abdominal umbilical vein varix despite close monitoring. Prenat Diagn 2004; 24: 451-454
- 43 Kong CW, Chan LW, To WW. Neonatal outcome and mode of delivery in the presence of nuchal cord loops: implications on patient counselling and the mode of delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015; 292: 283-289
- 44 Dias T, Mahsud-Dornan S, Bhide A et al. Cord entanglement and perinatal outcome in monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35: 201-204
- 45 Rossi AC, Prefumo F. Impact of cord entanglement on perinatal outcome of monoamniotic twins: a systematic review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 131-135
- 46 Lin MG. Umbilical cord prolapse. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2006; 61: 269-277
- 47 Hasbun J, Alcalde JL, Sepulveda W. Three-dimensional power Doppler sonography in the prenatal diagnosis of a true knot of the umbilical cord: value and limitations. J Ultrasound Med 2007; 26: 1215-1220
- 48 Abuhamad A. Three-dimensional ultrasound with color Doppler imaging of an umbilical cord true knot. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 360
- 49 Sathiyathasan S, Jeyanthan K, Hamid R. Umbilical hemangioma: a case report. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011; 283 (Suppl. 01) 15-17
- 50 Satge DC, Laumond MA, Desfarges F et al. An umbilical cord teratoma in a 17-week-old fetus. Prenat Diagn 2001; 21: 284-288
- 51 Berry SM, Stone J, Norton ME et al. Fetal blood sampling. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209: 170-180
- 52 Tongsong T, Wanapirak C, Kunavikatikul C et al. Cordocentesis at 16–24 weeks of gestation: experience of 1,320 cases. Prenat Diagn 2000; 20: 224-228
- 53 Seoud M, Aboul-Hosn L, Nassar A et al. Spontaneous umbilical cord hematoma: a rare cause of acute fetal distress. Am J Perinatol 2001; 18: 99-102
- 54 Jouannelle C, Giansily-Blaizot M, Monpoux F et al. Spontaneous umbilical cord haematoma and congenital factor VII deficiency. Haemophilia 2012; 18: e24-e25