Step Ladder Expansive Cranioplasty: Feasibility Study on Computed Tomographic Scan Images

Abstract

Background A novel technique of step ladder expansive cranioplasty was suggested, in a recent study, as a credible alternative to decompressive hemicraniectomy and found feasible on evaluation on a mathematical model, where human cranium was represented by a hemisphere of 9 cm radius. The findings on the mathematical model required to be validated in clinical setting before planning any clinical trial.

Methods A retrospective analysis of cases of decompressive craniectomy performed at a single neurosurgery center over past 18 months was done. Cases in which an NCCT head was repeated on the first postoperative day, due to evidence of intractable raised ICP postoperatively, were included in the study. The pre- and postoperative films were evaluated to determine various parameters, namely the thickness of skull bone at the craniectomy margins, projection of dural outpouching beyond the craniectomy defect, and the height required to be gained by an expansive cranioplasty to accommodate the augmented volume of the dural sac.

Results Six cases that satisfied all criteria were included. The mean surface area of craniectomy defects were 66.89 cm² in size. The maximum projection of the dural outpouching, as measured from the craniectomy margin, was 2.7 cm, necessitating construction of an expansive cranioplasty achieving 1.6 cm of gain in height in the cranium with minimum calvarial convexity.

Conclusion The results of this study indicate that a two-step expansive cranioplasty can accommodate adequate volume expansion in individuals whose average calvarial thickness at the craniectomy defect is 0.8 cm.

Keywords

decompressive craniotomy - step ladder expansive cranioplasty - NCCT images

• References

• 1 Jiang JY, Xu W, Li WP , et al. Efficacy of standard trauma craniectomy for refractory intracranial hypertension with severe traumatic brain injury: a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study. J Neurotrauma 2005; 22 (6) 623-628
• 2 Bao YH, Liang YM, Gao GY, Pan YH, Luo QZ, Jiang JY. Bilateral decompressive craniectomy for patients with malignant diffuse brain swelling after severe traumatic brain injury: a 37-case study. J Neurotrauma 2010; 27 (2) 341-347
• 3 Yoo DS, Kim DS, Cho KS, Huh PW, Park CK, Kang JK. Ventricular pressure monitoring during bilateral decompression with dural expansion. J Neurosurg 1999; 91 (6) 953-959
• 4 Yamaura A, Makino H. Neurological deficits in the presence of the sinking skin flap following decompressive craniectomy. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1977; 17 (1, Pt 1) 43-53
• 5 Valença MM, Martins C, da Silva JC, , et al. An innovative technique of decompressive craniectomy for acute ischemic stroke. In: Balestrino M. , ed. Advances in the Treatment of Ischemic Stroke. InTech; 2012. Available at: http://www.intechopen.com/books/advances-in-the-treatment-of-ischemicstroke/decompressive-craniectomy-for-cerebral-ischemia
• 6 Peethambaran AK, Valsalmony J. Four-quadrant osteoplastic decompressive craniotomy: a novel technique for decompressive craniectomy avoiding revision cranioplasty after surgery. Neurol India 2012; 60 (6) 672-674
• 7 Sengupta SK. Step-ladder expansive cranioplasty after decompressive craniotomy and expansive duraplasty: discussing possibilities on a mathematical model. Indian J Neurosurg 2015; 4: 15-21
• 8 Olivecrona M, Rodling-Wahlström M, Naredi S, Koskinen LO. Effective ICP reduction by decompressive craniectomy in patients with severe traumatic brain injury treated by an ICP-targeted therapy. J Neurotrauma 2007; 24 (6) 927-935
• 9 Skoglund TS, Eriksson-Ritzén C, Jensen C, Rydenhag B. Aspects on decompressive craniectomy in patients with traumatic head injuries. J Neurotrauma 2006; 23 (10) 1502-1509
• 10 Cavuşoğlu H, Kaya RA, Türkmenoğlu ON, Aydin Y. Value of early unilateral decompressive craniectomy in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2010; 16 (2) 119-124