Timing of Surgery for Neurologically Compromised Traumatic Cervical Spine Injuries

Zydrunas Rackauskas; Ona Lapteva; Saulius Rocka

doi:10.1055/s-0035-1564052

Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A: Central European Neurosurgery, Table of Contents

J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2016; 77(05): 427-431
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1564052

Review Article

Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Timing of Surgery for Neurologically Compromised Traumatic Cervical Spine Injuries

Authors

Zydrunas Rackauskas

¹Department of Neurosurgery, Republican Vilnius University Hospital, Vilnius, Lithuania

²Clinic of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania
Ona Lapteva

¹Department of Neurosurgery, Republican Vilnius University Hospital, Vilnius, Lithuania

²Clinic of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania
Saulius Rocka

¹Department of Neurosurgery, Republican Vilnius University Hospital, Vilnius, Lithuania

²Clinic of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania

Abstract

Timing of surgical decompression for traumatic cervical spine injuries remains uncertain. Numerous preclinical studies demonstrate the benefit of early decompression, and clinical data are controversial. We review the existing evidence and discuss the effect of timing on clinical, functional, and neurologic outcomes.

Keywords

timing - spinal cord injury - surgical decompression - central cord syndrome - neurologic outcome

Full Text

References

References
1 Carlson GD, Gorden CD, Oliff HS, Pillai JJ, LaManna JC. Sustained spinal cord compression: part I: time-dependent effect on long-term pathophysiology. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A (1) 86-94
2 Dimar II JR, Glassman SD, Raque GH, Zhang YP, Shields CB. The influence of spinal canal narrowing and timing of decompression on neurologic recovery after spinal cord contusion in a rat model. Spine 1999; 24 (16) 1623-1633
3 Fehlings MG, Vaccaro A, Wilson JR , et al. Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS). PLoS ONE 2012; 7 (2) e32037
4 Bötel U, Gläser E, Niedeggen A. The surgical treatment of acute spinal paralysed patients. Spinal Cord 1997; 35 (7) 420-428
5 Tator CH, Fehlings MG, Thorpe K, Taylor W. Current use and timing of spinal surgery for management of acute spinal cord injury in North America: results of a retrospective multicenter study. J Neurosurg 1999; 91 (1, Suppl): 12-18
6 Rackauskas Z, Lapteva O, Vaitenas G , et al. Neurologijos Seminarai 2012; 16 (54) 335-340
7 La Rosa G, Conti A, Cardali S, Cacciola F, Tomasello F. Does early decompression improve neurological outcome of spinal cord injured patients? Appraisal of the literature using a meta-analytical approach. Spinal Cord 2004; 42 (9) 503-512
8 Levi L, Wolf A, Rigamonti D, Ragheb J, Mirvis S, Robinson WL. Anterior decompression in cervical spine trauma: does the timing of surgery affect the outcome?. Neurosurgery 1991; 29 (2) 216-222
9 Mirza SK, Krengel III WF, Chapman JR , et al. Early versus delayed surgery for acute cervical spinal cord injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; (359) 104-114
10 Pollard ME, Apple DF. Factors associated with improved neurologic outcomes in patients with incomplete tetraplegia. Spine 2003; 28 (1) 33-39
11 Vaccaro AR, Daugherty RJ, Sheehan TP , et al. Neurologic outcome of early versus late surgery for cervical spinal cord injury. Spine 1997; 22 (22) 2609-2613
12 Farmer J, Vaccaro A, Albert TJ, Malone S, Balderston RA, Cotler JM. Neurologic deterioration after cervical spinal cord injury. J Spinal Disord 1998; 11 (3) 192-196
13 Maynard Jr FM, Bracken MB, Creasey G , et al; American Spinal Injury Association. International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1997; 35 (5) 266-274
14 Frankel HL, Hancock DO, Hyslop G , et al. The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. I. Paraplegia 1969; 7 (3) 179-192
15 Campagnolo DI, Esquieres RE, Kopacz KJ. Effect of timing of stabilization on length of stay and medical complications following spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 1997; 20 (3) 331-334
16 Croce MA, Bee TK, Pritchard E, Miller PR, Fabian TC. Does optimal timing for spine fracture fixation exist?. Ann Surg 2001; 233 (6) 851-858
17 McKinley W, Meade MA, Kirshblum S, Barnard B. Outcomes of early surgical management versus late or no surgical intervention after acute spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85 (11) 1818-1825
18 Schneider RC, Cherry G, Pantek H. The syndrome of acute central cervical spinal cord injury; with special reference to the mechanisms involved in hyperextension injuries of cervical spine. J Neurosurg 1954; 11 (6) 546-577
19 Greenberg MS. Handbook of Neurosurgery. New York, NY: Thieme; 2010
20 Bosch A, Stauffer ES, Nickel VL. Incomplete traumatic quadriplegia. A ten-year review. JAMA 1971; 216 (3) 473-478
21 Chen L, Yang H, Yang T, Xu Y, Bao Z, Tang T. Effectiveness of surgical treatment for traumatic central cord syndrome. J Neurosurg Spine 2009; 10 (1) 3-8
22 Guest J, Eleraky MA, Apostolides PJ, Dickman CA, Sonntag VK. Traumatic central cord syndrome: results of surgical management. J Neurosurg 2002; 97 (1, Suppl): 25-32
23 Stevens EA, Marsh R, Wilson JA, Sweasey TA, Branch Jr CL, Powers AK. A review of surgical intervention in the setting of traumatic central cord syndrome. Spine J 2010; 10 (10) 874-880
24 Rackauskas Z, Lapteva O. Optimal time for surgery in patients with central cord syndrome [in Lithuanian]. Neurologijos Seminarai 2013; 17 (57) 223-230