PDF herunterladen
Arquivos Brasileiros de Neurocirurgia: Brazilian Neurosurgery 2015; 34(04): 280-290
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1564422
Original Article | Artigo Original
Thieme Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

The Role of the Intraoperative Auxiliary Methods in the Resection of Motor Area Lesions

O papel dos métodos auxiliares intraoperatórios na ressecção de lesões em área motora
Stênio Abrantes Sarmento
1   Instituto Paraibano do Cérebro, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil
2   Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB) and Faculdade de Medicina Nova Esperança (FAMENE), João Pessoa, PB, Brazil
,
Emerson Magno de Andrade
1   Instituto Paraibano do Cérebro, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil
,
Helder Tedeschi
3   Department of Neurosurgery, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

30. März 2015

07. August 2015

Publikationsdatum:
28. Oktober 2015 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objective In recent years, technologies have advanced considerably in improving surgical outcome following treatment of lesions in eloquent brain areas. The aim of this study is to explore which method is best in the resection of motor area lesions.

Methods Prospective, non-randomized study Evaluate on 74 patients who underwent surgery to remove lesions around the motor area.

Results Total lesion removal was achieved in 68 patients (93.1%). Fifty-four patients (73.9%) presented normal motor function in the preoperative period; of these, 20 (37.3%) developed transitory deficits. Nevertheless, 85% of these patients later experienced a complete recovery. Nineteen patients presented with motor deficits preoperatively; of these, five presented deteriorating motor abilities. Intraoperative stimulation methods were used in 65% of the patients, primarily in cases of glioma.

Conclusions The morbidity in patients submitted to resections of motor area lesions is acceptable and justify the surgical indication with the purpose of maximal resection. Intraoperative stimulation is an important tool that guides glioma resection in many cases.

Resumo

Objetivo Nos últimos anos, consideráveis avanços tecnológicos têm surgido no sentido de melhorar os resultados cirúrgicos no tratamento de lesões em áreas eloquentes do cérebro. O objetivo deste estudo é investigar qual o melhor método para ressecção de lesões em área motora.

Método Estudo prospectivo não aleatório que avaliou os resultados pós-operatórios em 74 pacientes submetidos à ressecção de lesões em área motora ou adjacente.

Resultados A ressecção cirúrgica foi considerada total em 68 (93,1%) pacientes. 54 pacientes (73,9%) apresentavam força muscular normal no pré-operatório. Destes, 20 (37,3%) apresentaram déficit no pós-operatório imediato, sendo que 17 (85%) recuperaram completamente o déficit. 19 pacientes apresentavam déficit no pré-operatório, sendo que 05 apresentaram piora do déficit no pós-operatório imediato. A estimulação intraoperatória foi utilizada em 65% dos casos, principalmente nos gliomas.

Conclusão A morbidade em pacientes operados de lesões em área motora é bastante aceitável e justifica a indicação cirúrgica com objetivo de ressecção máxima. A estimulação intraoperatória é uma ferramenta importante para guiar a resseção dos gliomas em muitos casos.

Keywords

motor cortex - brain neoplasms - stereotaxic techniques - neuronavigation

Palavras-chave

córtex motor - neoplasia cerebral - técnicas estereotáxicas - neuronavegação
 

  • References

  • 1 Berger MS, Kincaid J, Ojemann GA, Lettich E. Brain mapping techniques to maximize resection, safety, and seizure control in children with brain tumors. Neurosurgery 1989; 25 (5) 786-792
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Berger MS, Ojemann GA. Intraoperative brain mapping techniques in neuro-oncology. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1992; 58 (1–4) 153-161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Eisner W, Burtscher J, Bale R , et al. Use of neuronavigation and electrophysiology in surgery of subcortically located lesions in the sensorimotor strip. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 72 (3) 378-381
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ebeling U, Schmid UD, Ying H, Reulen HJ. Safe surgery of lesions near the motor cortex using intra-operative mapping techniques: a report on 50 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1992; 119 (1–4) 23-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Duffau H, Capelle L, Denvil D , et al. Usefulness of intraoperative electrical subcortical mapping during surgery for low-grade gliomas located within eloquent brain regions: functional results in a consecutive series of 103 patients. J Neurosurg 2003; 98 (4) 764-778
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Roux FE, Boulanouar K, Ibarrola D, Tremoulet M, Chollet F, Berry I. Functional MRI and intraoperative brain mapping to evaluate brain plasticity in patients with brain tumours and hemiparesis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 69 (4) 453-463
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Yousry TA, Schmid UD, Jassoy AG , et al. Topography of the cortical motor hand area: prospective study with functional MR imaging and direct motor mapping at surgery. Radiology 1995; 195 (1) 23-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Zimmermann M, Seifert V, Trantakis C, Raabe A. Open MRI-guided microsurgery of intracranial tumours in or near eloquent brain areas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2001; 143 (4) 327-337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Achten E, Jackson GD, Cameron JA, Abbott DF, Stella DL, Fabinyi GC. Presurgical evaluation of the motor hand area with functional MR imaging in patients with tumors and dysplastic lesions. Radiology 1999; 210 (2) 529-538
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ammirati M, Vick N, Liao YL, Ciric I, Mikhael M. Effect of the extent of surgical resection on survival and quality of life in patients with supratentorial glioblastomas and anaplastic astrocytomas. Neurosurgery 1987; 21 (2) 201-206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Brown PD, Maurer MJ, Rummans TA , et al. A prospective study of quality of life in adults with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas: the impact of the extent of resection on quality of life and survival. Neurosurgery 2005; 57 (3) 495-504 , discussion 495–504
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sarmento SA, de Andrade EM, Tedeschi H. Strategies for resection of lesions in the motor area: preliminary results in 42 surgical patients. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2006; 64 (4) 963-970
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Sarmento SA, Jácome DC, de Andrade EM, Melo AV, de Oliveira OR, Tedeschi H. Relationship between the coronal suture and the central lobe: how important is it and how can we use it in surgical planning?. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2008; 66 (4) 868-871
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Gusmão S, Reis C, Silveira RL, Cabral G. [Relationships between the coronal suture and the sulci of the lateral convexity of the frontal lobe: neurosurgical applications]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2001; 59 (3-A): 570-576
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ribas GC, Yasuda A, Ribas EC, Nishikuni K, Rodrigues Jr AJ. Surgical anatomy of microneurosurgical sulcal key points. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (4) (Suppl. 02) ONS177-ONS210 , discussion ONS210–ONS211
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Rhoton Jr AL. The cerebrum. Neurosurgery 2002; 51 (4, Suppl) S1-S51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ribas GC, Oliveira Ed. The insula and the central core concept. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2007; 65 (1) 92-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Stone JL. Paul Broca and the first craniotomy based on cerebral localization. J Neurosurg 1991; 75 (1) 154-159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Bizzi A, Blasi V, Falini A , et al. Presurgical functional MR imaging of language and motor functions: validation with intraoperative electrocortical mapping. Radiology 2008; 248 (2) 579-589
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Araújo D, Machado HR, Oliveira RS , et al. Brain surface reformatted imaging (BSRI) in surgical planning for resections around eloquent cortex. Childs Nerv Syst 2006; 22 (9) 1122-1126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Cotton F, Rozzi FR, Vallee B , et al. Cranial sutures and craniometric points detected on MRI. Surg Radiol Anat 2005; 27 (1) 64-70
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Boling W, Olivier A, Fabinyi G. Historical contributions to the modern understanding of function in the central area. Neurosurgery 2002; 50 (6) 1296-1309 , discussion 1309–1310
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Gupta DK, Chandra PS, Ojha BK, Sharma BS, Mahapatra AK, Mehta VS. Awake craniotomy versus surgery under general anesthesia for resection of intrinsic lesions of eloquent cortex—a prospective randomised study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2007; 109 (4) 335-343
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Bittar RG, Olivier A, Sadikot AF, Andermann F, Pike GB, Reutens DC. Presurgical motor and somatosensory cortex mapping with functional magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography. J Neurosurg 1999; 91 (6) 915-921
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Duffau H. A personal consecutive series of surgically treated 51 cases of insular WHO Grade II glioma: advances and limitations. J Neurosurg 2009; 110 (4) 696-708
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Duffau H, Capelle L, Sichez J , et al. Intra-operative direct electrical stimulations of the central nervous system: the Salpêtrière experience with 60 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1999; 141 (11) 1157-1167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Silbergeld DL. Intraoperative transdural functional mapping. Technical note. J Neurosurg 1994; 80 (4) 756-758
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Keles GE, Lundin DA, Lamborn KR, Chang EF, Ojemann G, Berger MS. Intraoperative subcortical stimulation mapping for hemispherical perirolandic gliomas located within or adjacent to the descending motor pathways: evaluation of morbidity and assessment of functional outcome in 294 patients. J Neurosurg 2004; 100 (3) 369-375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Berman JI, Berger MS, Chung SW, Nagarajan SS, Henry RG. Accuracy of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging tractography assessed using intraoperative subcortical stimulation mapping and magnetic source imaging. J Neurosurg 2007; 107 (3) 488-494
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Zentner J, Meyer B, Stangl A, Schramm J. Intrinsic tumors of the insula: a prospective surgical study of 30 patients. J Neurosurg 1996; 85 (2) 263-271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Skirboll SS, Ojemann GA, Berger MS, Lettich E, Winn HR. Functional cortex and subcortical white matter located within gliomas. Neurosurgery 1996; 38 (4) 678-684 , discussion 684–685
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Schiffbauer H, Ferrari P, Rowley HA, Berger MS, Roberts TP. Functional activity within brain tumors: a magnetic source imaging study. Neurosurgery 2001; 49 (6) 1313-1320 , discussion 1320–1321
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Tan TC, McL Black P. Image-guided craniotomy for cerebral metastases: techniques and outcomes. Neurosurgery 2003; 53 (1) 82-89 , discussion 89–90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Reithmeier T, Krammer M, Gumprecht H, Gerstner W, Lumenta CB. Neuronavigation combined with electrophysiological monitoring for surgery of lesions in eloquent brain areas in 42 cases: a retrospective comparison of the neurological outcome and the quality of resection with a control group with similar lesions. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2003; 46 (2) 65-71
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Ganslandt O, Fahlbusch R, Nimsky C , et al. Functional neuronavigation with magnetoencephalography: outcome in 50 patients with lesions around the motor cortex. J Neurosurg 1999; 91 (1) 73-79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Zhou H, Miller D, Schulte DM , et al. Transsulcal approach supported by navigation-guided neurophysiological monitoring for resection of paracentral cavernomas. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2009; 111 (1) 69-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Lehéricy S, Duffau H, Cornu P , et al. Correspondence between functional magnetic resonance imaging somatotopy and individual brain anatomy of the central region: comparison with intraoperative stimulation in patients with brain tumors. J Neurosurg 2000; 92 (4) 589-598
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Baciu M, Le Bas JF, Segebarth C, Benabid AL. Presurgical fMRI evaluation of cerebral reorganization and motor deficit in patients with tumors and vascular malformations. Eur J Radiol 2003; 46 (2) 139-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Pujol J, Conesa G, Deus J , et al. Presurgical identification of the primary sensorimotor cortex by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 1996; 84 (1) 7-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Desmurget M, Bonnetblanc F, Duffau H. Contrasting acute and slow-growing lesions: a new door to brain plasticity. Brain 2007; 130 (Pt 4): 898-914
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Duffau H. Recovery from complete hemiplegia following resection of a retrocentral metastasis: the prognostic value of intraoperative cortical stimulation. J Neurosurg 2001; 95 (6) 1050-1052
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Fontaine D, Capelle L, Duffau H. Somatotopy of the supplementary motor area: evidence from correlation of the extent of surgical resection with the clinical patterns of deficit. Neurosurgery 2002; 50 (2) 297-303 , discussion 303–305
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Wu JS, Zhou LF, Tang WJ , et al. Clinical evaluation and follow-up outcome of diffusion tensor imaging-based functional neuronavigation: a prospective, controlled study in patients with gliomas involving pyramidal tracts. Neurosurgery 2007; 61 (5) 935-948 , discussion 948–949
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Yoshiura T, Hasuo K, Mihara F, Masuda K, Morioka T, Fukui M. Increased activity of the ipsilateral motor cortex during a hand motor task in patients with brain tumor and paresis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997; 18 (5) 865-869
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Thiel A, Herholz K, Koyuncu A , et al. Plasticity of language networks in patients with brain tumors: a positron emission tomography activation study. Ann Neurol 2001; 50 (5) 620-629
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar