Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2016; 124(03): 148-156
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1565177
Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Fasting C-peptide and Related Parameters Characterizing Insulin Secretory Capacity for Correctly Classifying Diabetes Type and for Predicting Insulin Requirement in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

F. S. Becht
1   Diabeteszentrum Bad Lauterberg (Harz), Germany (where work was performed)
,
K. Walther
1   Diabeteszentrum Bad Lauterberg (Harz), Germany (where work was performed)
,
E. Martin
1   Diabeteszentrum Bad Lauterberg (Harz), Germany (where work was performed)
,
M. A. Nauck
1   Diabeteszentrum Bad Lauterberg (Harz), Germany (where work was performed)
2   Division of Diabetology, ST. Josef Hospital, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany (address for correspondence)
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

received 03. Juni 2015
first decision 26. Oktober 2015

accepted 28. Oktober 2015

Publikationsdatum:
29. Januar 2016 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Background/aims: C-peptide allows estimation of insulin secretion even in the presence of insulin treatment. C-peptide may be suitable for the differential diagnosis of type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and, within type 2 diabetes, of insulin-requiring vs. non-insulin-requiring patients. Relating C-peptide concentrations to ambient glucose levels might improve its diagnostic potential.

Patients/methods: The diagnostic value (a) fasting C-peptide, (b) C-peptide/glucose ratios, and (c) the HOMA-ßC-peptide-index for predicting a diagnosis of type 1 (vs. type 2) diabetes were assessed. Setting: Specialised hospital for the care of diabetic patients (inpatient treatment). 303 patients with type 1 diabetes and 841 patients with type 2 diabetes. Main outcome measure: Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for a clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes or for insulin treatment by deciles of (a) fasting C-peptide, (b) C-peptide/glucose ratios, and (c) HOMA-ßC-peptide-index.

Results: Low C-peptide concentrations were associated with a high odds ratio for type 1 diabetes and vice versa (p<0.0001). Concentrations of 0.13–0.36 nmol/l did not discriminate. C-peptide/glucose ratios or HOMA-ßC-Peptide did not perform better. The ability of all 3 parameters to predict the necessity for insulin treatment within the population of type 2-diabetic patients was low.

Conclusions: Fasting C-peptide and derived parameters help to differentiate type 1 from type 2 diabetes, but there is a range of C-peptide concentrations that does not help discriminate. Relating C-peptide to glucose did not improve diagnostic accuracy. C-peptide does not help predicting a need for insulin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Supplementary Material