Open Access
Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes Reports 2015; 02(03): e17-e20
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1565236
Case Report
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Macroprolactin: the Role of Serial Measurement Throughout Pregnancy

M. Livingston
1   Department of Blood Sciences, Walsall Manor Hospital, Walsall, United Kingdom
,
S. Nair
2   Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Leighton Hospital, Crewe, United Kingdom
,
D. Radford
2   Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Leighton Hospital, Crewe, United Kingdom
,
J. Kane
3   Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Salford Royal Hospitals NHS Trust, Salford, United Kingdom
,
A. H. Heald
2   Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Leighton Hospital, Crewe, United Kingdom
4   The School of Medicine and Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

received 12. August 2015
first decision 07. Oktober 2015

accepted 11. November 2015

Publikationsdatum:
05. Februar 2016 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Introduction: Prolactin circulates predominantly as a 23 kDa monomer, and a high molecular weight form largely consisting of a complex of prolactin and anti-prolactin IgG autoantibody called macroprolactin. The latter cross-reacts with conventional laboratory assays for prolactin.

We here describe the use of serial macroprolactin measurement to assist in the management of a pregnant lady with pre-conception hyperprolactinaemia in whom a magnetic resonance imaging scan had not been performed.

Case Report: A 24-year old lady was found to have a raised prolactin level of 2 332 mu/L (reference range: 40–530 mu/L). Prolactin was checked because of primary infertility. Macroprolactin screening was positive, accounting for 54% of measured prolactin (estimated monomeric prolactin=1 073 mu/L).

As expected, measured prolactin levels rose through pregnancy to 6 975 mu/L at 20 weeks and to 8 374 mu/L at 36 weeks gestation.

Adjustment for macroprolactin and big prolactin gave estimated monomeric prolactin levels of 2 370 mu/L at 16 weeks (macroprolactin/big prolactin=66%), 2 441 mu/L at 20 weeks (macroprolactin/big prolactin=65%) and 2 596 mu/L at 36 weeks (macroprolactin/big prolactin=69%). Thus, adjusted prolactin fell within the reference range for pregnancy at these points.

Gel filtration chromatography was performed on the 20-week (second trimester) sample and compared with the pre-pregnancy sample. The pattern remained similar but all components were increased in the second trimester sample (including the monomeric, big prolactin and macroprolactin forms).

Conclusion: In this case report, serial measurement of macroprolactin with estimation of monomeric prolactin enhanced clinical management throughout pregnancy, saving unnecessary further investigations and avoiding unnecessary distress for the patient.