PDF herunterladen
Ultrasound Int Open 2016; 02(01): E8-E12
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1565243
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Determining Tarsus Curvature in Relation To Direction of Gaze Using Non-contact Ultrasound Video Assistance

T. Schrom
1   Head and Neck Surgery/Plastic Surgery, Clinic for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Bad Saarow, HELIOS Clinics Bad Saarow, Germany
,
R. Amberg
2   Institute for International Media and Computing, Economics II, University of Applied Science, Berlin, Germany
,
F. Bast
3   Department for Otolaryngology, AMEOS Klinikum Haldensleben, Haldensleben, Germany
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

received 03. Mai 2015

accepted 31. Oktober 2015

Publikationsdatum:
15. Januar 2016 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Purpose:

Plastic surgery on the eyelids for the purpose of aesthetic or functional correction requires precise knowledge of lid anatomy. Changes in the tarsal curvature of the upper eyelid relative to line of vision are important, particularly when a surgical correction of paralytic lagophthalmos is undertaken. We used a computer-based image-processing algorithm to establish a relationship between changes in the curvature of the tarsus relative to the line of vision.

Material and Methods:

A dynamic, ultrasound examination of the upper eyelids of 100 participants (100 eyes) was performed transpalpebrally using a 7.5 MHz scanner with the patient looking straight ahead, away from and towards the midline of the body. A computer-aided examination of the upper eyelid tarsus was then performed, followed by the calculation of the radius of curvature of the tarsus relative to the line of vision in each position.

Results:

Using regression of a Taylor polynomial, the shape of the tarsus was mapped by a quadratic function, and the change in tarsal curvature relative to line of sight could be demonstrated.

Conclusion:

With objective evidence of change in the tarsal curvature relative to the line of sight, this may influence the treatment of pathological changes in the upper eyelid.

Key words

eye - face - ultrasound
 

  • References

  • 1 Rauber A, Kopsch F. Nervensystem – Sinnesorgane. In: Lehrbuch und Atlas der Anatomie des Menschen. Stuttgart: Thieme Verlag; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Amini R, Jouzdani S, Barocas VH. Increased iris-lens contact following spontaneous blinking: mathematical modeling. J Biomech 2012; 45: 2293-2296
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kakizaki H, Leibovitch I, Selva D et al. Orbital septum attachment on the levator aponeurosis in Asians: in vivo and cadaver study. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 2031-2035
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Connell B, Brian G, Bond MJ. A case-control study of biometry in healthy and cataractous Eritrean eyes. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1997; 4: 151-155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Richard MJ, Morris C, Deen BF et al. Analysis of the anatomic changes of the aging facial skeleton using computer-assisted tomography. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 25: 382-386
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Pierro L, Brancato R, Robino X et al. Axial length in patients with diabetes. Retina 1999; 19: 401-404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Jank S, Deibl M, Strobl H et al. Intrarater reliability in the ultrasound diagnosis of medial and lateral orbital wall fractures with a curved array transducer. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64: 68-73
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Laws F, Laws D, Wood I et al. Assessment of a new through-the-eyelid technique for ‘A’ scan ultrasound ocular axial length measurement. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1998; 18: 408-414
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Aviv RI, Miszkiel K. Orbital imaging: Part 2. Intraorbital pathology. Clin Radiol 2005; 60: 288-307
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Twelker JD, Kirschbaum S, Zadnik K et al. Comparison of corneal versus through-the-lid A-scan ultrasound biometry. Optom Vis Sci 1997; 74: 852-858
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Lee HS, Lew H, Yun YS. Ultrasonographic measurement of upper eyelid thickness in Korean children with epicanthus. Korean J Othalmol 2006; 20: 79-81
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Schrom T, Grube A, Goldhahn A et al. Sonographic imaging of upper eyelid tarsal radii when changing the direction of vision. Ultraschall Med 2001; 22: 172-175
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Schrom T, Bloching M, Wernecke K et al. Measurement of upper eyelid implants curvature by ultrasound. Laryngoscope 2005; 115: 884-888
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Schrom T, Wernecke K, Debelius A et al. Ultrasound of the upper eyelid to evaluate tarsal curvature in facial palsy. Klin Monbl fur Augenheilkd 2006; 223: 285-288
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Thomae N, Plagwitz KU, Husar P et al. Hough transformation for image processing in eye tracking recording. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2002; 47 (Suppl. 01) Pt 2 636-638
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lew H, Yu SB, Yun YS et al. Correction of epiblepharon of the upper eyelid by the buried suture technique: correlation with morphological features of the upper eyelid. Ophthalmologica 2008; 222: 100-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lee H, Park M, Lee TE et al. Surgical correction of epiblepharon using thermal cauterization of the orbital septum and lash-rotating sutures. J Craniofac Surg 2010; 21: 1069-1071
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Schrom T, Habermann A, Wernecke K et al. Implantation of lid weights for therapy of lagophthalmos. Ophthalmologe 2005; 102: 1186-1192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Schrom T, Habermann A, Wernecke K et al. Lidloading and intraocular pressure. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2005; 222: 46-49
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar