Comparison of Two Kinds of Lasers in the Treatment of Acne Scars

Abstract

Acne scars are common and stigmatizing for the affected patients. Besides surgery, chemical peels, microdermabrasion, and microneedling, the treatment with fractional laser is a standard therapy. The results of reducing acne scars treated either with a fractional Er:YAG (erbium-doped yttrium-aluminum-garnet [Er:Y3Al5O1]) or a carbon dioxide (CO ₂ ) laser at different wavelengths were compared and evaluated in the pilot study presented here. Fourteen patients with severe scars on both cheeks were treated four times in a random split-face approach: on one side with Er:YAG laser and on the contralateral side with CO₂ laser following a standardized protocol. Therapeutic success was evaluated through the use of a high-resolution, 3D small-field capture system (PRIMOS), digital photography, and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) questionnaire. The evaluation was performed by a blinded investigator. Treatment results displayed a higher efficacy of the fractional CO₂ laser compared with the Er:YAG laser as displayed by digital photographs. Additionally, objective (high-resolution, 3D small-field capture; PRIMOS) and subjective (POSAS) measuring results correlated positively in certain qualities (color, stiffness, thickness, surface, overall opinion). Using a novel scientific approach, we evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of different fractional lasers on acne scars using a rater-blinded approach. Compared with an Er:YAG laser, better skin smoothening was achieved by fractional CO₂ laser treatment.

Keywords

CO₂ laser - Er:YAG laser - fractional lasers - acne scars - aesthetic medicine - scar therapy

• References

• 1 Gollnick HP, Zouboulis CC, Akamatsu H, Kurokawa I, Schulte A. Pathogenesis and pathogenesis related treatment of acne. J Dermatol 1991; 18 (9) 489-499
• 2 Nast A, Dréno B, Bettoli V , et al; European Dermatology Forum. European evidence-based (S3) guidelines for the treatment of acne. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2012; 26 (Suppl. 01) 1-29
• 3 Ghodsi SZ, Orawa H, Zouboulis CC. Prevalence, severity, and severity risk factors of acne in high school pupils: a community-based study. J Invest Dermatol 2009; 129 (9) 2136-2141
• 4 Garg S, Baveja S. Combination therapy in the management of atrophic acne scars. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2014; 7 (1) 18-23
• 5 Layton AM, Henderson CA, Cunliffe WJ. A clinical evaluation of acne scarring and its incidence. Clin Exp Dermatol 1994; 19 (4) 303-308
• 6 Fabbrocini G, Annunziata MC, D'Arco V , et al. Acne scars: pathogenesis, classification and treatment. Dermatol Res Pract 2010; 2010: 893080
• 7 Jacob CI, Dover JS, Kaminer MS. Acne scarring: a classification system and review of treatment options. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001; 45 (1) 109-117
• 8 Rivera AE. Acne scarring: a review and current treatment modalities. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 59 (4) 659-676
• 9 Al-Dhalimi M, Jaber A. Treatment of atrophic facial acne scars with fractional Er:Yag laser. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2015; 17 (4) 184-188
• 10 Kim DH, Ryu HJ, Choi JE, Ahn HH, Kye YC, Seo SH. A comparison of the scar prevention effect between carbon dioxide fractional laser and pulsed dye laser in surgical scars. Dermatol Surg 2014; 40 (9) 973-978
• 11 Laubach HJ, Tannous Z, Anderson RR, Manstein D. Skin responses to fractional photothermolysis. Lasers Surg Med 2006; 38 (2) 142-149
• 12 Manstein D, Herron GS, Sink RK, Tanner H, Anderson RR. Fractional photothermolysis: a new concept for cutaneous remodeling using microscopic patterns of thermal injury. Lasers Surg Med 2004; 34 (5) 426-438
• 13 Omi T, Numano K. The role of the CO₂ laser and fractional CO₂ laser in dermatology. Laser Ther 2014; 23 (1) 49-60
• 14 Riggs K, Keller M, Humphreys TR. Ablative laser resurfacing: high-energy pulsed carbon dioxide and erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet. Clin Dermatol 2007; 25 (5) 462-473
• 15 van Drooge AM, Vrijman C, van der Veen W, Wolkerstorfer A. A randomized controlled pilot study on ablative fractional CO₂ laser for consecutive patients presenting with various scar types. Dermatol Surg 2015; 41 (3) 371-377
• 16 Falder S, Browne A, Edgar D , et al. Core outcomes for adult burn survivors: a clinical overview. Burns 2009; 35 (5) 618-641
• 17 Idriss N, Maibach HI. Scar assessment scales: a dermatologic overview. Skin Res Technol 2009; 15 (1) 1-5
• 18 van der Wal MB, Verhaegen PD, Middelkoop E, van Zuijlen PP. A clinimetric overview of scar assessment scales. J Burn Care Res 2012; 33 (2) e79-e87
• 19 Vercelli S, Ferriero G, Sartorio F, Stissi V, Franchignoni F. How to assess postsurgical scars: a review of outcome measures. Disabil Rehabil 2009; 31 (25) 2055-2063