Drug Res (Stuttg) 2016; 66(07): 345-350
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1569454
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Ipragliflozin as an Initial Therapy in Drug Naïve Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes

E. Kutoh
1   Department of Clinical Research, Biomedical Center, Tokyo, Japan
2   Division of Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Gyoda General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
3   Division of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Higashitotsuka Memorial Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
,
A. Wada
2   Division of Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Gyoda General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
,
T. Murayama
1   Department of Clinical Research, Biomedical Center, Tokyo, Japan
,
M. Hirate
1   Department of Clinical Research, Biomedical Center, Tokyo, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 April 2016 (online)

Zoom Image

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to investigate ipragliflozin as an initial type 2 diabetes (T2DM) drug.

Methods: Ipragliflozin 25–50 mg/day monotherapy was performed with drug naïve subjects with T2DM (n=31). As a comparator, 12.5–25 mg/day alogliptin monotherapy was undertaken (n=32). At 3 months, levels of metabolic parameters were compared with those at baseline.

Findings: 4 subjects discontinued ipragliflozin due to intolerance or adverse events, while none dropped out with alogliptin. At 3 months, similar decreases of HbA1c levels were observed with these 2 drugs (10.21–8.31%, p<0.00001, with ipragliflozin, and 10.08–8.25%, p<0.00001, with alogliptin), however fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels decreased with significant inter-group differences (− 23.5% with iprgliflozin and – 10.8% with alogliptin). While similar increases of homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)-B levels were observed with these 2 drugs, HOMA-R levels significantly decreased only with ipragliflozin (−19.4%, p<0.02). Un-correlative link between HOMA-R and HOMA-B levels at baseline became significantly correlative (R=0.6017, p<0.001) only with ipragliflozin. Significant reductions of body mass index (BMI, −2.6%, P<0.05) were observed with ipragliflozin, however, no correlations between the changes of BMI and those of HbA1c or FBG were noted.

Conclusions: These results suggest that ipragliflozin has good glycemic efficacy as an initial therapy in subjects with T2DM, although certain adverse events or tolerability issues are concerned. It improves insulin sensitivity and may restore the impaired beta-cell function. However body weight reduction with ipragliflozin is not associated with its glycemic efficacy.