Comparison of Classical and Secondary Cytologic Criteria Relative to Hybrid Capture for Diagnosing Cervical-vaginal Infection by Human Papillomavirus

Abstract

Objective To compare the diagnostic accuracy of the classic Meisels cytologic criteria and the Schneider secondary criteria relative to the hybrid capture method for diagnosing HPV infection.

Methods This was a retrospective study performed at a public university hospital. A total of 41 patients with a cytologic diagnosis of HPV infection and 40 HPV-negative patients were selected for review of the cervical-vaginal smears seeking to classical and secondary criteria. A single pathologist reviewed the slides in search of the criteria. The classical and secondary cytologic criteria were compared with the hybrid capture for diagnosing HPV infection. Bartleti test was applied for the age analysis, and Fisher's exact test was used to compare proportions. The tests were considered significant when the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis was less than 5% (p < 0.05).

Results The Meisels criteria were less sensitive (34.0%) than the secondary Schneider criteria (57.5%) when compared with the hybrid capture (p < 0.0001), although the specificity of the former criteria was non-significantly higher (91.2% and 67.7%, respectively). In cases of moderate or intense inflammation, the sensitivity and specificity of the Schneider criteria were decreased, 33.3% and 50.0% respectively (p = 0.0115).

Conclusions Compared with hybrid capture for diagnosis of HPV infection, the sensitivity of the secondary Schneider criteria was higher than the classical Meisels criteria. Moderate or intense inflammation reduces the sensitivity and specificity of the secondary Schneider criteria for diagnosing HPV infection using the hybrid capture as the gold standard.

Resumo

Objetivo Comparar a acurácia diagnóstica dos critérios citológicos clássicos de Meisels com a dos critérios secundários de Schneider em relação a captura híbrida para o diagnóstico de infecção pelo HPV.

Métodos Trata-se de estudo retrospectivo realizado em hospital público universitário. Quarenta e uma pacientes com diagnóstico citológico de infecção pelo HPV e 40 pacientes HPV-negativas foram selecionadas para avaliação dos esfregaços cervicais-vaginais em busca dos critérios clássicos e secundários. Um único patologista reviu as lâminas. Os critérios citológicos clássicos e secundários foram comparados com a captura híbrida para o diagnóstico de infecção pelo HPV. O teste de Bartleti foi aplicado para a análise das idades e o teste exato de Fisher para comparar proporções. Os testes foram considerados significativos quando a probabilidade de rejeitar a hipótese de nulidade foi menor que 5% (p < 0,05).

Resultados Os critérios de Meisels foram menos sensíveis (34,0%) que os secundários de Schneider (57,5%) quando comparados com a captura híbrida (p < 0,0001), embora a especificidade dos critérios de Meisels não tenha sido significativamente superior (91,2% e 67,7%, respectivamente). Em casos de inflamação moderada ou intensa, a sensibilidade e especificidade dos critérios secundários de Schneider foram diminuídas, 33,3% e 50,0%, respectivamente (p = 0,0115).

Conclusões Comparado a captura híbrida para o diagnóstico da infecção pelo HPV, a sensibilidade dos critérios secundários de Schneider foi maior que a dos critérios clássicos de Meisels. Inflamação moderada ou intensa reduziu a sensibilidade e especificidade dos critérios secundários de Schneider para o diagnóstico de infecção pelo HPV utilizando a captura híbrida como padrão-ouro.

Keywords

HPV - cervical neoplasia - vaginal smears - papillomavirus - DNA

Palavras-chave

HPV - neoplasia do colo do útero - esfregaço vaginal - papilomavírus - DNA

• References

• 1 Guarisi R, Hardy E, Derchain SFM, Fonsechi-Carvasan GA, Borges JBR. Rastreamento, diagnóstico e tratamento das lesões precursoras e do câncer invasor do colo uterino no município de Franco da Rocha, SP. Rev Bras Cancerol 2004; 50 (1) 7-15
• 2 Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva [Internet]. Tipos de câncer: colo do útero. Brasília (DF): Ministério da Saúde; 2014 [citado 2015 Jul 10]. Disponível em: < http:/www.inca.gov.br/wps/wcm/connect/tiposdecancer/site/home/colo_utero>
• 3 DeMay RM. The art and science of cytopathology. 2nd ed. Vol. 1, Exfoliative cytology. Chicago: American Society of Clinical Pathologists Press; 2012. . Chapter 1, The pap test; p. 2–149
• 4 Silva C, Almeida EC, Côbo EdeC, Zeferino VF, Murta EF, Etchebehere RM. A retrospective study on cervical intraepithelial lesions of low-grade and undetermined significance: evolution, associated factors and cytohistological correlation. Sao Paulo Med J 2014; 132 (2) 92-96
• 5 Cope JU, Hildesheim A, Schiffman MH , et al. Comparison of the hybrid capture tube test and PCR for detection of human papillomavirus DNA in cervical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1997; 35 (9) 2262-2265
• 6 Curry CL, Sage YH, Vragovic O, Stier EA. Minimally abnormal Pap testing and cervical histology in HIV-infected women. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2012; 21 (1) 87-91
• 7 Cuzick J, Arbyn M, Sankaranarayanan R , et al. Overview of human papillomavirus-based and other novel options for cervical cancer screening in developed and developing countries. Vaccine 2008; 26 (Suppl. 10) K29-K41
• 8 Muñoz N. Human papillomavirus and cancer: the epidemiological evidence. J Clin Virol 2000; 19 (1–2) 1-5
• 9 Nomelini RS, Guimarães PD, Candido PA, Campos AC, Michelin MA, Murta EFC. Prevention of cervical cancer in women with ASCUS in the Brazilian Unified National Health System: cost-effectiveness of the molecular biology method for HPV detection. Cad Saude Publica 2012; 28 (11) 2043-2052
• 10 Akbar S, Pervez SN, Shah W. Manual liquid based cytology for Pap smear preparation and HPV detection by PCR in Pakistan. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015; 16 (2) 579-583
• 11 Kashyap V, Hedau S, Bhambhani S. Defining the validity of classical and non-classical cellular changes indicative of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion encompassing human papillomavirus infection in relation to human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid testing. J Cytol 2011; 28 (4) 159-164
• 12 Papanicolaou GN. Atlas of exfoliative cytology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1954
• 13 Meisels A, Fortin R. Condylomatous lesions of the cervix and vagina. I. Cytologic patterns. Acta Cytol 1976; 20 (6) 505-509
• 14 Meisels A, Fortin R, Roy M. Condylomatous lesions of the cervix. II. Cytologic, colposcopic and histopathologic study. Acta Cytol 1977; 21 (3) 379-390
• 15 Schneider A, Meinhardt G, De-Villiers EM, Gissmann L. Sensitivity of the cytologic diagnosis of cervical condyloma in comparison with HPV-DNA hybridization studies. Diagn Cytopathol 1987; 3 (3) 250-255
• 16 Roteli-Martins CM, Alves VA, Santos RT, Martinez EZ, Syrjänen KJ, Derchain SF. Value of morphological criteria in diagnosing cervical HPV lesions confirmed by in situ hybridization and hybrid capture assay. Pathol Res Pract 2001; 197 (10) 677-682
• 17 Bollmann M, Bánkfalvi A, Trosic A, Speich N, Schmittt C, Bollmann R. Can we detect cervical human papillomavirus (HPV) infection by cytomorphology alone? Diagnostic value of non-classic cytological signs of HPV effect in minimally abnormal Pap tests. Cytopathology 2005; 16 (1) 13-21
• 18 Kaneshima EN, Suzuki LE, Irie MMT, Yoshida CS, Silva SFM, Consolaro MEL. Importância da aplicação de critérios morfológicos não clássicos para o diagnóstico citopatológico de Papilomavírus humano (HPV) previamente detectado por PCR. Acta Bioquím Clin Latinoam. 2005; 39 (1) 61-68
• 19 Jordão AV, Ruggeri LS, Chiucheta GIR, Piva S, Consolaro MEL. Importância da aplicação de critérios morfológicos não clássicos para o diagnóstico citomorfológico de papilomavírus humano. J Bras Patol Med Lab. 2003; 39 (1) 81-89
• 20 Rebolj M, Lynge E, Ejegod D, Preisler S, Rygaard C, Bonde J. Comparison of three human papillomavirus DNA assays and one mRNA assay in women with abnormal cytology. Gynecol Oncol 2014; 135 (3) 474-480
• 21 Arango HG. Bioestatística: teórica e computacional. 3a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara-Koogan; 2009
• 22 Adad SJ, de Lima RV, Sawan ZT , et al. Frequency of Trichomonas vaginalis, Candida sp and Gardnerella vaginalis in cervical-vaginal smears in four different decades. Sao Paulo Med J 2001; 119 (6) 200-205
• 23 Thaxton L, Waxman AG. Cervical cancer prevention: immunization and screening 2015. Med Clin North Am 2015; 99 (3) 469-477
• 24 de Faria IM, Melo VH, de Castro LP , et al. [Accuracy of oncotic cytology for HPV infection diagnosis on the cervix uteri of HIV-infected women]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2008; 30 (9) 437-444 Portuguese
• 25 Wentzensen N, Klug SJ. Cervical cancer control in the era of HPV vaccination and novel biomarkers. Pathobiology 2009; 76 (2) 82-89
• 26 Sopracordevole F, Cigolot F, Mancioli F, Agarossi A, Boselli F, Ciavattini A. Knowledge of HPV infection and vaccination among vaccinated and unvaccinated teenaged girls. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2013; 122 (1) 48-51
• 27 Nigam A, Saxena P, Acharya AS, Mishra A, Batra S. HPV vaccination in India: critical appraisal. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2014; 2014: 394595