Differentiation between Posterior Sinuses Using the Medial Orbital Floor as a Landmark

Abstract

Objectives This study aims to evaluate the difference in height between the floors of the posterior ethmoid and sphenoid sinuses with respect to the medial orbital floor (MOF) to confirm this difference as a landmark for identification of the posterior sinuses. It also aims to describe this difference regarding the type of pneumatization of the sphenoid sinus (conchal, presellar, and sellar).

Design A cross-sectional study was conducted.

Study Center The study was conducted at the Department of Radiology of Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, a tertiary care university hospital in Southern Brazil.

Materials and Methods A standardized and computerized analysis of 100 tomography scans of sinuses (200 sides), in patients older than 18 years, was carried out.

Results Mean vertical distance (height) from the MOF to the floor of the posterior ethmoid and sphenoid sinuses was 0.72 ± 1.85 mm and 9.48 ± 3.81 mm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference as compared with sex and side. We found conchal-type sphenoid sinus pneumatization in 1.5% (n = 3), presellar in 13.5% (n = 27), and sellar in 85% (n = 170), whereas the vertical distance between the MOF and the floor of the sphenoid sinus was 2.04 ± 0.81 in the conchal-type sinuses, 5.71 ± 2.49 in the presellar sinuses, and 10.21 ± 3.52 in the sellar sinuses. No sphenoid sinus showed its floor above the MOF, regardless of the type of pneumatization.

Discussion and Conclusion The present study demonstrates that there is a difference between the floor of the posterior sphenoid and ethmoid sinuses in adults, which is more evident when the sphenoid sinus is well pneumatized. These data suggest that the difference in height between the floors of the sinus investigated in our study may be considered during endoscopic sinus surgery to guide adequate localization, but the surgeon should be aware of the type of pneumatization of the sphenoid sinus to use this landmark.

Keywords

medial orbital floor - posterior ethmoid sinus - sphenoid sinus - endoscopic sinus surgery - landmarks

• References

• 1 Messerklinger W. [Endoscopy of the nose]. Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol 1970; 104 (10) 451-456
• 2 Orlandi RR, Smith B, Shah L, Wiggins III RH. Endoscopic verification of the sphenoid sinus. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2012; 2 (1) 16-19
• 3 May M, Schaitkin B, Kay SL. Revision endoscopic sinus surgery: six friendly surgical landmarks. Laryngoscope 1994; 104 (6 Pt 1): 766-767
• 4 Casiano RR. A stepwise surgical technique using the medial orbital floor as the key landmark in performing endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 2001; 111 (6) 964-974
• 5 Hamberger CA, Hammer G, Norlen G, Sjogren B. Transantrosphenoidal hypophysectomy. Arch Otolaryngol 1961; 74: 2-8
• 6 Harvey RJ, Shelton W, Timperley D , et al. Using fixed anatomical landmarks in endoscopic skull base surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2010; 24 (4) 301-305
• 7 Perondi GE, Isolan GR, de Aguiar PH, Stefani MA, Falcetta EF. Endoscopic anatomy of sellar region. Pituitary 2013; 16 (2) 251-259
• 8 Isolan GR, de Aguiar PHP, Laws ER, Strapasson ACP, Piltcher O. The implications of microsurgical anatomy for surgical approaches to the sellar region. Pituitary 2009; 12 (4) 360-367
• 9 Lee JM, Woods T, Grewal A. Preoperative evaluation of the maxillary sinus roof as a guide for posterior ethmoid and sphenoid sinus surgery. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 41 (5) 361-369
• 10 Orlandi RR, Lanza DC, Bolger WE, Clerico DM, Kennedy DW. The forgotten turbinate: the role of the superior turbinate in endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol 1999; 13 (4) 251-259
• 11 Millar DA, Orlandi RR. The sphenoid sinus natural ostium is consistently medial to the superior turbinate. Am J Rhinol 2006; 20 (2) 180-181
• 12 Bolger WE, Keyes AS, Lanza DC. Use of the superior meatus and superior turbinate in the endoscopic approach to the sphenoid sinus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 120 (3) 308-313
• 13 Wolf G, Anderhuber W, Kuhn F. Development of the paranasal sinuses in children: implications for paranasal sinus surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993; 102 (9) 705-711
• 14 Orlandi RR, Petersen E. Image guidance: A survey of attitudes and use. Am J Rhinol 2006; 20 (4) 406-411
• 15 Smith TL, Stewart MG, Orlandi RR, Setzen M, Lanza DC. Indications for image-guided sinus surgery: the current evidence. Am J Rhinol 2007; 21 (1) 80-83
• 16 Batra PS. Radiologic imaging in rhinosinusitis. Cleve Clin J Med 2004; 71 (11) 886-888
• 17 Beale TJ, Madani G, Morley SJ. Imaging of the paranasal sinuses and nasal cavity: normal anatomy and clinically relevant anatomical variants. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2009; 30 (1) 2-16