PDF herunterladen
Semin intervent Radiol 2016; 33(01): 056-060
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1572356
Morbidity and Mortality
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Concurrent Vascular Lesions during Renal Angiography: A Potential Distractor

Senthil Gunasekaran
1   Department of Radiology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
,
Christopher Goettl
1   Department of Radiology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
,
James T. Bui
1   Department of Radiology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
,
Charles E. Ray Jr.
1   Department of Radiology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
22. März 2016 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Reduced detection of radiologic findings due to the presence of a second lesion, commonly known as satisfaction of search (SOS), is a well-described phenomenon in the diagnostic radiology literature.[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] Although not specifically described in the interventional radiology (IR) literature, it is likely that the same general phenomena of SOS holds true for procedural-based radiologists. The following case and companion demonstrates coexisting vascular pathology that diverted operators during a renal embolization procedure.

 

  • References

  • 1 Berbaum KS, Brandser EA, Franken EA, Dorfman DD, Caldwell RT, Krupinski EA. Gaze dwell times on acute trauma injuries missed because of satisfaction of search. Acad Radiol 2001; 8 (4) 304-314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Berbaum KS, Franken Jr EA. Satisfaction of search in radiographic modalities. Radiology 2011; 261 (3) 1000-1001 , author reply 1001–1002
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Berbaum KS, Schartz KM, Caldwell RT , et al. Satisfaction of search from detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography of the chest. Acad Radiol 2013; 20 (2) 194-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Botchu R, Rao B, Tyagi R. MDCT of the abdomen: missed diagnoses due to satisfaction of search. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195 (4) W314-W316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Franken Jr EA, Berbaum KS, Lu CH , et al. Satisfaction of search in the detection of plain-film abnormalities in abdominal contrast studies. Invest Radiol 1994; 29 (4) 403-409
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ha AS, Porrino JA, Chew FS. Radiographic pitfalls in lower extremity trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 203 (3) 492-500
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Horton KM, Johnson PT, Fishman EK. MDCT of the abdomen: common misdiagnoses at a busy academic center. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194 (3) 660-667
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Whittier WL, Korbet SM. Timing of complications in percutaneous renal biopsy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004; 15 (1) 142-147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Xue R, Wang M, Li Q , et al. Successful interventional treatment of post-biopsy renal artery pseudoaneurysm in pediatric patients. Clin Nephrol 2013; 79 (5) 407-413
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Whittier WL. Complications of the percutaneous kidney biopsy. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2012; 19 (3) 179-187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Willam P, Lawrence HB, Martin MB , et al. Gray's Anatomy. 38th ed. Churchill Livingstone; 1995: 1826
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Chai JW, Lee W, Yin YH , et al. CT angiography for living kidney donors: accuracy, cause of misinterpretation and prevalence of variation. Korean J Radiol 2008; 9 (4) 333-339
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Darcy M. Error by distraction. Semin Intervent Radiol 2012; 29 (4) 337-340
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Fleck MS, Samei E, Mitroff SR. Generalized “satisfaction of search”: adverse influences on dual-target search accuracy. J Exp Psychol Appl 2010; 16 (1) 60-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar