PDF herunterladen
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2016; 20(01): 130-136
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1579709
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Dual-Energy Computed Tomography of the Knee, Ankle, and Foot: Noninvasive Diagnosis of Gout and Quantification of Monosodium Urate in Tendons and Ligaments

Jan Fritz
1   Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
2   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
,
Joerg C. Henes
3   Centre for Interdisciplinary Clinical Immunology, Rheumatology and Auto-inflammatory Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine II (Oncology, Hematology, Immunology, Rheumatology, Pulmonology), Eberhard Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
,
Matthew K. Fuld
4   Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, Pennsylvania
,
Elliot K. Fishman
1   Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Marius S. Horger
2   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
14. April 2016 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Gout is a true crystal deposition arthropathy caused by the precipitation of monosodium urate into joints and periarticular soft tissues. It is the most common inflammatory arthropathy in men and women of older age with a male-to-female ratio of 3 to 8:1. The disease may progress from asymptomatic hyperuricemia through symptomatic acute gout attacks with asymptomatic periods into chronic symptomatic tophaceous gout. Although invasive arthrocentesis and demonstration of monosodium urate crystals on polarized light microscopy is definitive for the diagnosis of gout, dual-energy computed tomography (CT) allows for noninvasive visualization and reproducible volume quantification of monosodium urate crystals. Based on the high diagnostic performance, dual-energy CT has been included in the 2015 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Collaborative Initiative Classification Criteria for Gout. Increasing evidence indicates the usefulness of dual-energy CT to guide the management of patients with suspected gout and monitor the effectiveness of urate-lowering medical therapy.

Keywords

dual energy - computed tomography - gout - crystal - monosodium urate
 

  • References

  • 1 Nuki G, Simkin PA. A concise history of gout and hyperuricemia and their treatment. Arthritis Res Ther 2006; 8 (Suppl. 01) S1
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Schlesinger N. Diagnosing and treating gout: a review to aid primary care physicians. Postgrad Med 2010; 122 (2) 157-161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Pittman JR, Bross MH. Diagnosis and management of gout. Am Fam Physician 1999; 59 (7) 1799-1806 , 1810
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Fox IH, Kelley WN. Studies on the mechanism of fructose-induced hyperuricemia in man. Adv Exp Med Biol 1974; 41: 463-470
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Roddy E, Zhang W, Doherty M. The changing epidemiology of gout. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 2007; 3 (8) 443-449
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Doherty M. New insights into the epidemiology of gout. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009; 48 (Suppl. 02) ii2-ii8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG , et al; National Arthritis Data Workgroup. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 58 (1) 26-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Puig JG, de Miguel E, Castillo MC, Rocha AL, Martínez MA, Torres RJ. Asymptomatic hyperuricemia: impact of ultrasonography. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 2008; 27 (6) 592-595
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Neogi T, Jansen TL, Dalbeth N , et al. 2015 Gout classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2015; 74 (10) 1789-1798
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Gentili A. Advanced imaging of gout. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2003; 7 (3) 165-174
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Krauss B, Grant KL, Schmidt BT, Flohr TG. The importance of spectral separation: an assessment of dual-energy spectral separation for quantitative ability and dose efficiency. Invest Radiol 2015; 50 (2) 114-118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Omoumi P, Becce F, Racine D, Ott JG, Andreisek G, Verdun FR. Dual-energy CT: basic principles, technical approaches, and applications in musculoskeletal imaging (Part 1). Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2015; 19 (5) 431-437
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Johnson TR, Krauss B, Sedlmair M , et al. Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2007; 17 (6) 1510-1517
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Mallinson PI, Coupal T, Reisinger C , et al. Artifacts in dual-energy CT gout protocol: a review of 50 suspected cases with an artifact identification guide. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 203 (1) W103–109
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Fritz J, Fishman EK, Corl F, Carrino JA, Weber KL, Fayad LM. Imaging of limb salvage surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198 (3) 647-660
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Dalbeth N, Kalluru R, Aati O, Horne A, Doyle AJ, McQueen FM. Tendon involvement in the feet of patients with gout: a dual-energy CT study. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 72 (9) 1545-1548
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Choi HK, Burns LC, Shojania K , et al. Dual energy CT in gout: a prospective validation study. Ann Rheum Dis 2012; 71 (9) 1466-1471
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Glazebrook KN, Guimarães LS, Murthy NS , et al. Identification of intraarticular and periarticular uric acid crystals with dual-energy CT: initial evaluation. Radiology 2011; 261 (2) 516-524
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Wu H, Xue J, Ye L, Zhou Q, Shi D, Xu R. The application of dual-energy computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute gouty arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2014; 33 (7) 975-979
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Metzger SC, Koehm M, Wichmann JL , et al. Dual-energy CT in patients with suspected gouty arthritis: effects on treatment regimen and clinical outcome. Acad Radiol 2016; 23 (3) 267-272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 O'Connor PJ. Crystal deposition disease and psoriatic arthritis. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2013; 17 (1) 74-79
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Schwenzer NF, Kötter I, Henes JC , et al. The role of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the differential diagnosis of psoriatic and rheumatoid arthritis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194 (3) 715-720
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Fritz J, Galeczko EK, Schwenzer N , et al. Longitudinal changes in rheumatoid arthritis after rituximab administration assessed by quantitative and dynamic contrast-enhanced 3-T MR imaging: preliminary findings. Eur Radiol 2009; 19 (9) 2217-2224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Bencardino JT, Hassankhani A. Calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal deposition disease. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2003; 7 (3) 175-185
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Omoumi P, Verdun FR, Guggenberger R, Andreisek G, Becce F. Dual-energy CT: basic principles, technical approaches, and applications in musculoskeletal imaging (Part 2). Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2015; 19 (5) 438-445
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar