J Wrist Surg 2016; 05(04): 265-272
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1579764
Scientific Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Stage III Advanced Wrist Collapse Treatment Options: A Cadaveric Study

Jorge Chahla
1   Department of BioMedical Engineering, Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado
,
Jason M. Schon
1   Department of BioMedical Engineering, Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado
,
Ramiro Olleac
2   Upper Extremity and Hand Surgery Department, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
,
Sebastián Senes
2   Upper Extremity and Hand Surgery Department, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
,
Damián Arroquy
2   Upper Extremity and Hand Surgery Department, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
,
Chase S. Dean
1   Department of BioMedical Engineering, Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado
,
Gabriel Clembosky
2   Upper Extremity and Hand Surgery Department, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
,
Alvaro Muratore
2   Upper Extremity and Hand Surgery Department, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

11. Januar 2016

11. Februar 2016

Publikationsdatum:
09. März 2016 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Background Scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse result in high morbidity and pose significant challenges for active patients. Multiple treatment options have been proposed to yield satisfactory results; however, restoration of physiological wrist motion remains an issue.

Questions/Purposes The objective of this study was to compare wrist mobility after four different treatment methods for grade III wrist collapse: (1) no treatment, (2) scaphoidectomy and lunate-capitate arthrodesis, (3) scaphoidectomy, lunate-capitate arthrodesis, and triquetrum-hamate arthrodesis, and (4) scaphoidectomy, lunate-capitate arthrodesis, and triquetrum excision.

Methods Four paired (n = 8) fresh-frozen human cadaveric upper limbs were used in this controlled laboratory study. Computed tomography scans were collected at all testing states and measurements were made to evaluate midcarpal joint mobility and alignment.

Results A significant decrease in wrist extension was observed for all treatments. Middle column and two-column arthrodesis demonstrated no significant differences for carpal alignment and mobility. No significant differences were observed for triquetrum-hamate mobility or wrist extension between the partial and two-column arthrodesis. Triquetrum excision significantly improved ulnar deviation.

Conclusion The most important finding of this study was that the one-column arthrodesis has comparable carpal alignment and range of motion to that of bi-column arthrodesis.

Clinical Relevance The results of this study suggest that a stage III advanced wrist collapse can be treated by isolated lunate-capitate arthrodesis with scaphoidectomy. Fusion between the remaining carpal bones may not be necessary because the carpal alignment and range of motion of the remaining joints were not significantly different in the present study.

Note

Internal review board approval was not required to conduct this investigation because de-identified cadaveric specimens are exempt from review at our institution. This investigation was performed at the biomechanics laboratory at the Hopsital Británico de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.