PDF herunterladen
Am J Perinatol 2017; 34(02): 169-173
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1584927
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Glycerin Suppositories Use in Very Low Birth Weight Infants

Shalinkumar Patel
1   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee
,
Narendra Dereddy
1   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee
,
Ajay J. Talati
1   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee
,
Kan Gaston
3   Department of Pharmacy, Regional One Health, Memphis, Tennessee
,
Ramasubbareddy Dhanireddy
1   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

31. Januar 2016

31. Mai 2016

Publikationsdatum:
01. Juli 2016 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objective To study the characteristics of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants receiving glycerin suppositories (GS) and evaluate the association of GS use with outcomes.

Study Design This is a retrospective study of VLBW infants admitted to a level III neonatal intensive care unit. Infants with birth weight between 500 and 1,499 g were evaluated. We evaluated the frequency of GS use and compared the characteristics and outcomes of the GS group with the no-GS group. Multivariate analyses controlling for gestational age and small for gestational age status were performed to study the effect of GS on outcomes.

Results A total of 1,073 infants were included in the study. Out of those, 527 (49.1%) infants received GS. Incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis was not significantly different between the two groups, while days to reach full enteral feeds and length of hospital stay were significantly longer in the GS group.

Conclusion Frequent use of GS warrants further prospective studies to evaluate its safety and efficacy in view of our study showing association with longer time to reach full enteral feeds. We speculate that GS use could be a marker for gastrointestinal dysmotility and hence the association with unfavorable clinical outcomes.

Keywords

glycerin suppositories - feeding intolerance - preterm infants - necrotizing enterocolitis
 

  • References

  • 1 Ringer SA, Nurko S, Fournier K, Stark AR. Feeding intolerance in infants 24 to 29 weeks gestation: incidence and presentation. Pediatr Res 1996; 39: 319-319
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Fanaro S. Feeding intolerance in the preterm infant. Early Hum Dev 2013; 89 (2) (Suppl. 02) S13-S20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Anabrees J, Shah VS, AlOsaimi A, AlFaleh K. Glycerin laxatives for prevention or treatment of feeding intolerance in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (9) CD010464 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010464.pub2.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Mansi Y, Abdelaziz N, Ezzeldin Z, Ibrahim R. Randomized controlled trial of a high dose of oral erythromycin for the treatment of feeding intolerance in preterm infants. Neonatology 2011; 100 (3) 290-294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Shinde S, Kabra NS, Sharma SR, Avasthi BS, Ahmed J. Glycerin suppository for promoting feeding tolerance in preterm very low birthweight neonates: a randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr 2014; 51 (5) 367-370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Khadr SN, Ibhanesebhor SE, Rennix C , et al. Randomized controlled trial: impact of glycerin suppositories on time to full feeds in preterm infants. Neonatology 2011; 100 (2) 169-176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Mena N P, León Del P J, Sandino P D , et al. Meconium evacuation to improve feeding tolerance in very low birth weight preterm infants (Emita Protocol) [in Spanish]. Rev Chil Pediatr 2014; 85 (3) 304-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Pietz J, Achanti B, Lilien L, Stepka EC, Mehta SK. Prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants: a 20-year experience. Pediatrics 2007; 119 (1) e164-e170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Livingston MH, Shawyer AC, Rosenbaum PL, Williams C, Jones SA, Walton JM. Glycerin enemas and suppositories in premature infants: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2015; 135 (6) 1093-1106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Newell SJ. Enteral feeding of the micropremie. Clin Perinatol 2000; 27 (1) 221-234 , viii
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Verma A, Dhanireddy R. Time of first stool in extremely low birth weight (< or = 1000 grams) infants. J Pediatr 1993; 122 (4) 626-629
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kumar SL, Dhanireddy R. Time of first stool in premature infants: effect of gestational age and illness severity. J Pediatr 1995; 127 (6) 971-974
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Berseth CL. Gestational evolution of small intestine motility in preterm and term infants. J Pediatr 1989; 115 (4) 646-651
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Shah V, Chirinian N, Lee S ; EPIQ Evidence Review Group. Does the use of glycerin laxatives decrease feeding intolerance in preterm infants?. Paediatr Child Health (Oxford) 2011; 16 (9) e68-e70
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Haiden N, Jilma B, Gerhold B , et al. Small volume enemas do not accelerate meconium evacuation in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2007; 44 (2) 270-273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Shim SY, Kim HS, Kim DH , et al. Induction of early meconium evacuation promotes feeding tolerance in very low birth weight infants. Neonatology 2007; 92 (1) 67-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 ClinicalTrials.gov . Available at http://clinicaltrials.gov/ . Accessed August 25, 2015
    PubMed