Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1586176
Revision Rhinoplasty: What Can We Learn from Error Patterns? An Analysis of Revision Surgery
Publication History
Publication Date:
05 August 2016 (online)
Abstract
Of the many challenges in rhinoplasty, achieving a satisfactory outcome at the first operation is important. There are multiple reasons for secondary surgery, and generally revisions can be broadly classified into minor (often one area of deficit) or a total redo. Understanding the common technical reasons for failure in primary surgery by analyzing the deformities has resulted in various error patterns emerging. Understanding these patterns means we can modify techniques in primary surgery to reduce the incidence of revision. This article describes our prospective revision rhinoplasty experience over 5 and then 2 years, highlighting the main error patterns encountered. We also describe a stepwise analysis of four frequently encountered key problem areas alongside techniques to address them and offer pearls to help prevent further revision. Comparison of two cohorts of patients from a teaching hospital setting and private practice with the same operating surgeon indicates an increasing tendency to the open approach for revisions. The re-revision rates for these groups are 15.7 and 9%, respectively. Revision rhinoplasty is a difficult operation to perform to the satisfaction of both the surgeon and the patient. Understanding the common technical reasons for failure in primary surgery by fully analyzing the deformities means we can modify techniques in primary surgery to reduce the incidence of revision.
-
References
- 1 Adamson PA, Warner J, Becker D, Romo III TJ, Toriumi DM. Revision rhinoplasty: panel discussion, controversies, and techniques. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2014; 22 (1) 57-96
- 2 Thomson C, Mendelsohn M. Reducing the incidence of revision rhinoplasty. J Otolaryngol 2007; 36 (2) 130-134
- 3 Loyo M, Wang TD. Revision rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 2016; 43 (1) 177-185
- 4 Yu K, Kim A, Pearlman SJ. Functional and aesthetic concerns of patients seeking revision rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2010; 12 (5) 291-297
- 5 Neaman KC, Boettcher AK, Do VH , et al. Cosmetic rhinoplasty: revision rates revisited. Aesthet Surg J 2013; 33 (1) 31-37
- 6 Tardy ME, Schwartz MS. The Evolution of Rhinoplasty Outcome: Long Term Results. Rhinoplasty. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co.; 1993: 778-814
- 7 Kamer FM, McQuown SA. Revision rhinoplasty. Analysis and treatment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 114 (3) 257-266
- 8 Lee M, Zwiebel S, Guyuron B. Frequency of the preoperative flaws and commonly required maneuvers to correct them: a guide to reducing the revision rhinoplasty rate. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (4) 769-776
- 9 Adamson PA, Constantinides M, Kim AJ, Pearlman S. Rhinoplasty: panel discussion. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2014; 22 (1) 25-55
- 10 Toriumi DM. Discussion: Frequency of the preoperative flaws and commonly required maneuvers to correct them: a guide to reducing the revision rhinoplasty rate. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (4) 777-779
- 11 Kovacevic M, Wurm J. Spreader flaps for middle vault contour and stabilization. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2015; 23 (1) 1-9
- 12 Ballert JA, Park SS. Functional considerations in revision rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2008; 24 (3) 348-357
- 13 Paun SH, Nolst Trenité GJ. Revision rhinoplasty: an overview of deformities and techniques. Facial Plast Surg 2008; 24 (3) 271-287
- 14 Fedok FG. Revision rhinoplasty using the endonasal approach. Facial Plast Surg 2008; 24 (3) 293-309
- 15 Bagal AA, Adamson PA. Revision rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2002; 18 (4) 233-244
- 16 Foda HM. Rhinoplasty for the multiply revised nose. Am J Otolaryngol 2005; 26 (1) 28-34
- 17 Becker DG, Bloom J. Five techniques that I cannot live without in revision rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2008; 24 (3) 358-364
- 18 Guyuron B. Dynamics in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (6) 2257-2259
- 19 Nassif PS. Male revision rhinoplasty: pearls and surgical techniques. Facial Plast Surg 2005; 21 (4) 250-270
- 20 Defatta RJ, Williams III EE. The decision process for choosing costal cartilage in revision rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2008; 24 (3) 365-371
- 21 Cafferty A, Becker DG. Open and closed rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 2016; 43 (1) 17-27
- 22 Friedman O, Akcam T, Cook T. Reconstructive rhinoplasty: the 3-dimensional nasal tip. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2006; 8 (3) 195-201
- 23 Davis RE. Lateral crural tensioning for refinement of the wide and underprojected nasal tip: rethinking the lateral crural steal. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2015; 23 (1) 23-53
- 24 Defatta RJ, Williams III EF. The decision process in choosing costal cartilage for use in revision rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2008; 24 (3) 365-371