Download PDF
Indian Journal of Neurotrauma 2016; 13(02): 088-093
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1586233
Original Article
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.

Upper Airway Dimensions in North Indian Population: A Possible Guide to Appropriate Length of Laryngoscope Blade

Deepak K. Jha
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Human Behavior and Allied Sciences, Delhi, India
,
Anil Thakur
2   Department of Otolaryngology, Patliputra Medical College and Hospital, Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India
,
Chandra B. Tripathi
3   Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Human Behavior and Allied Sciences, Delhi, India
,
Mukul Jain
4   Department of Neuroanesthesia, Institute of Human Behavior and Allied Sciences, Delhi, India
,
Rima Kumari
5   Department of Neuroradiology, Institute of Human Behavior and Allied Sciences, Delhi, India
,
Monali Chaturvedi
5   Department of Neuroradiology, Institute of Human Behavior and Allied Sciences, Delhi, India
,
Arvind Arya
4   Department of Neuroanesthesia, Institute of Human Behavior and Allied Sciences, Delhi, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

31 March 2016

21 June 2016

Publication Date:
10 August 2016 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background The use of adequate size of blade may help minimize failures of endotracheal intubation (ETI) in non–operating room (OR) settings which are usually done by non–anesthesia health care professionals (NAHP). Prospective study was done to assess the appropriate length of the laryngoscope blade for North Indian population.

Materials and Methods Upper incisor-to-vallecula (UI-V), lower incisor-to-vallecula (LI-V), and lower end of mandible to hyoid (M-H) distances were measured on routine computed tomography (CT) images of head and neck, done in the neuroradiology department in successive patients older than 11 years of age with normal airway structures.

Results A total of 126 patients, which included 53 females and 73 males with an average age of 34.5 years (range 14–67 years), formed the study group. UI-V of males and females were 7.35 ± 0.54 and 6.99 ± 0.51 cm, respectively, and the difference was significant. LI-V of males and females were 7.05 ± 0.51 and 6.66 ± 0.50 cm, respectively, and the difference was significant. M-H in males and females were 3.42 ± 0.63 and 3.59 ± 0.52 cm, respectively, and the difference was not significant. Open mouth CT in 11 patients revealed an average increase of 1.66 and 0.45 cm in UI-V and LI-V (n = 11), respectively, and 0.59 cm decrease in M-H (n = 9) which were significant.

Conclusion Upper airway dimensions of the population may be the used for selecting appropriate size of blade of laryngoscope for ETI in non-OR settings especially by NAHP.

Keywords

laryngoscope blade size - endotracheal intubation - upper airway dimension - laryngoscopy
 

  • References

  • 1 Mulcaster JT, Mills J, Hung OR , et al. Laryngoscopic intubation: learning and performance. Anesthesiology 2003; 98 (1) 23-27
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 De Jong A, Jung B, Jaber S. Intubation in the ICU: we could improve our practice. Crit Care 2014; 18 (2) 209
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Jaber S, Amraoui J, Lefrant JY , et al. Clinical practice and risk factors for immediate complications of endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: a prospective, multiple-center study. Crit Care Med 2006; 34 (9) 2355-2361
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Kulkarni AP, Tirmanwar AS. Comparison of glottic visualisation and ease of intubation with different laryngoscope blades. Indian J Anaesth 2013; 57 (2) 170-174
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Yardeni IZ, Gefen A, Smolyarenko V, Zeidel A, Beilin B. Design evaluation of commonly used rigid and levering laryngoscope blades. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002; 46 (8) 1003-1009
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Hui CM, Tsui BC. Sublingual ultrasound as an assessment method for predicting difficult intubation: a pilot study. Anaesthesia 2014; 69 (4) 314-319
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 McIntyre JW. Laryngoscope design and the difficult adult tracheal intubation. Can J Anaesth 1989; 36 (1) 94-98
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 MacQuarrie K, Hung OR, Law JA. Tracheal intubation using Bullard laryngoscope for patients with a simulated difficult airway. Can J Anaesth 1999; 46 (8) 760-765
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Arino JJ, Velasco JM, Gasco C, Lopez-Timoneda F. Straight blades improve visualization of the larynx while curved blades increase ease of intubation: a comparison of the Macintosh, Miller, McCoy, Belscope and Lee-Fiberview blades. Can J Anaesth 2003; 50 (5) 501-506
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Jagannathan N, Sequera-Ramos L, Sohn L , et al. Randomized comparison of experts and trainees with nasal and oral fibreoptic intubation in children less than 2 yr of age. Br J Anaesth 2015; 114 (2) 290-296
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Sethuraman D, Darshane S, Guha A, Charters P. A randomised, crossover study of the Dorges, McCoy and Macintosh laryngoscope blades in a simulated difficult intubation scenario. Anaesthesia 2006; 61 (5) 482-487
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Marks RR, Hancock R, Charters P. An analysis of laryngoscope blade shape and design: new criteria for laryngoscope evaluation. Can J Anaesth 1993; 40 (3) 262-270
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Gabbott DA. Laryngoscopy using the McCoy laryngoscope after application of a cervical collar. Anaesthesia 1996; 51 (9) 812-814
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Henderson JJ. The use of paraglossal straight blade laryngoscopy in difficult tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 1997; 52 (6) 552-560
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Ghamande SA, Arroliga AC, Ciceri DP. Let's make endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit safe: difficult or not, the MACOCHA score is a good start. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 187 (8) 789-790
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Kim SH, Kim DH, Kang H, Suk EH, Park PH. Estimation of teeth-to-vallecula distance for prediction of optimal oropharyngeal airway length in young children. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107 (5) 769-773
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Asai T, Matsumoto S, Fujise K, Johmura S, Shingu K. Comparison of two Macintosh laryngoscope blades in 300 patients. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90 (4) 457-460
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Songu M, Adibelli ZH, Tuncyurek O, Adibelli H. Age-specific size of the upper airway structures in children during development. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2010; 119 (8) 541-546
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Luedike P, Totzeck M, Rammos C, Kindgen-Milles D, Kelm M, Rassaf T. The MACOCHA score is feasible to predict intubation failure of nonanesthesiologist intensive care unit trainees. J Crit Care 2015; 30 (5) 876-880
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Katz SH, Falk JL. Misplaced endotracheal tubes by paramedics in an urban emergency medical services system. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 37 (1) 32-37
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Konrad C, Schüpfer G, Wietlisbach M, Gerber H. Learning manual skills in anesthesiology: Is there a recommended number of cases for anesthetic procedures?. Anesth Analg 1998; 86 (3) 635-639
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Macintosh RR. A new laryngoscope. Lancet 1943; 241 (6233) 193-224
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Macintosh RR. Laryngoscope blades (Correspondence). Lancet 1944; 243 (6293) 485
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Robertshaw FL. A new laryngoscope for infants and children. Lancet 1962; 2 (7264) 1034
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Bismilla Z, Finan E, McNamara PJ, LeBlanc V, Jefferies A, Whyte H. Failure of pediatric and neonatal trainees to meet Canadian Neonatal Resuscitation Program standards for neonatal intubation. J Perinatol 2010; 30 (3) 182-187
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Bishop MJ, Harrington RM, Tencer AF. Force applied during tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 1992; 74 (3) 411-414
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Dorsch JA, Dorsch SE. Laryngoscopes. In: Tracy TM, Pine Jr JW, eds. Understanding Anesthesia Equipment, Construction, Case and Complications. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williums and Wilkins; 1984: 338-352
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 28 Horton WA, Fahy L, Charters P. Disposition of cervical vertebrae, atlanto-axial joint, hyoid and mandible during x-ray laryngoscopy. Br J Anaesth 1989; 63 (4) 435-438
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Horton WA, Fahy I, Charters P. Towards a single index for quantifying osseous factors in difficult laryngoscopy. Br J Anaesth 1990; 65 (4) 583-584P
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Miller RA. A new laryngoscope. Anesthesiology 1941; 2 (3) 317-320
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Robbertze R, Posner KL, Domino KB. Closed claims review of anesthesia for procedures outside the operating room. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2006; 19 (4) 436-442
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Wang HE, Kupas DF, Paris PM, Bates RR, Costantino JP, Yealy DM. Multivariate predictors of failed prehospital endotracheal intubation. Acad Emerg Med 2003; 10 (7) 717-724
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Krisanda TJ, Eitel DR, Hess D, Ormanoski R, Bernini R, Sabulsky N. An analysis of invasive airway management in a suburban emergency medical services system. Prehosp Disaster Med 1992; 7 (2) 121-126
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Lavery GG, McCloskey BV. The difficult airway in adult critical care. Crit Care Med 2008; 36 (7) 2163-2173
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar