Journal of Pediatric Biochemistry 2013; 03(02): 079-083
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1586432
Review Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart – New York

Diagnosis of neonatal sepsis in low resource settings: C-reactive protein or procalcitonin?

Andreas Chiabi
a   Yaounde Gynaeco-Obstetric and Pediatric Hospital/Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaounde I, Yaounde, Cameroon
,
Lawrence Mbuagbaw
b   Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
,
Francisca Monebenimp
c   Yaounde University Teaching Hospital/Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaounde I, Yaounde, Cameroon
,
Bolaji Obadeyi
d   Health Logics, Lagos, Nigeria
,
Grace Bissohong
e   Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaounde I, Yaounde, Cameroon
,
Marie-Thérèse Obama
c   Yaounde University Teaching Hospital/Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaounde I, Yaounde, Cameroon
› Author Affiliations

Subject Editor:
Further Information

Publication History

19 September 2012

01 November 2012

Publication Date:
01 August 2016 (online)

Abstract

C-reactive protein (CRP) is a biological marker currently used in the diagnosis of several infectious diseases. It has been widely used in the diagnosis and follow-up of treatment in neonatal sepsis. With the recent development of newer diagnostic markers, especially procalcitonin (PCT) that are more specific and sensitive though more expensive, the role of CRP requires appraisal. We sought to re-examine its use in low resource settings that carry the highest burden and mortality from neonatal sepsis. We argue that it is easy to perform, cost-effective and is still a valuable tool for making quick decisions in the diagnosis and management of neonatal sepsis, despite new emerging biological markers.