RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1587587
Adult-Based Massive Transfusion Protocol Activation Criteria Do Not Work in Children
Publikationsverlauf
13. Mai 2016
24. Juni 2016
Publikationsdatum:
17. August 2016 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/ejps/201701/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0036-1587587_163751oa-1.jpg)
Abstract
Introduction In the adult population, assessment of blood consumption (ABC) score [penetrating mechanism, positive focused assessment sonography for trauma (FAST), systolic blood pressure < 90, and heart rate (HR) > 120] ≥2 identifies trauma patients who require massive transfusion (MT) with sensitivity and specificity of 75 and 86%. We hypothesized that the adult criteria cannot be applied to children, as the vital sign cut-offs are not age-adjusted. We aimed to determine if the use of a shock index, pediatric age-adjusted (SIPA) would improve the discriminate ability of the ABC score in children.
Materials and Methods A retrospective review of children age 4 to 15 who received a packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion during admission for trauma between 2008 and 2014 was performed. We compared the sensitivity and specificity of ABC score ≥ 2, elevated SIPA, and age-adjusted ABC score (ABC-S) utilizing SIPA in place of HR and BP, to determine the need for MT.
Results A total of 50 children were included, 31 received PRBC transfusion within 6 hours of injury, 7 children had a positive FAST, and 3 suffered penetrating trauma, all in the early transfusion group. ABC score ≥ 2 is 29% sensitive and 100% specific at predicting need for MT while ABC-S score ≥ 1 is 65% sensitive and 84% specific.
Conclusions Adult-based criteria for activation of MT perform poorly in the pediatric population. The use of SIPA modestly improves the sensitivity of the ABC score in children; however, the sensitivity and specificity of this score are still worse than when used in an adult population. This suggests the need to develop a new score that takes into account the low rate of penetrating trauma and positive FAST in the pediatric population.
-
References
- 1 Sauaia A, Moore FA, Moore EE , et al. Epidemiology of trauma deaths: a reassessment. J Trauma 1995; 38 (2) 185-193
- 2 Kauvar DS, Lefering R, Wade CE. Impact of hemorrhage on trauma outcome: an overview of epidemiology, clinical presentations, and therapeutic considerations. J Trauma 2006; 60 (6, Suppl): S3-S11
- 3 Acosta JA, Yang JC, Winchell RJ , et al. Lethal injuries and time to death in a level I trauma center. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 186 (5) 528-533
- 4 Cotton BA, Gunter OL, Isbell J , et al. Damage control hematology: the impact of a trauma exsanguination protocol on survival and blood product utilization. J Trauma 2008; 64 (5) 1177-1182 , discussion 1182–1183
- 5 Malone DL, Hess JR, Fingerhut A. Massive transfusion practices around the globe and a suggestion for a common massive transfusion protocol. J Trauma 2006; 60 (6, Suppl): S91-S96
- 6 Borgman MA, Spinella PC, Perkins JG , et al. The ratio of blood products transfused affects mortality in patients receiving massive transfusions at a combat support hospital. J Trauma 2007; 63 (4) 805-813
- 7 Dente CJ, Shaz BH, Nicholas JM , et al. Improvements in early mortality and coagulopathy are sustained better in patients with blunt trauma after institution of a massive transfusion protocol in a civilian level I trauma center. J Trauma 2009; 66 (6) 1616-1624
- 8 del Junco DJ, Holcomb JB, Fox EE , et al; PROMMTT Study Group. Resuscitate early with plasma and platelets or balance blood products gradually: findings from the PROMMTT study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013; 75 (1) (Suppl. 01) S24-S30
- 9 Callcut RA, Cotton BA, Muskat P , et al; PROMMTT Study Group. Defining when to initiate massive transfusion: a validation study of individual massive transfusion triggers in PROMMTT patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013; 74 (1) 59-65 , 67–68, discussion 66–67
- 10 Callcut RA, Johannigman JA, Kadon KS, Hanseman DJ, Robinson BR. All massive transfusion criteria are not created equal: defining the predictive value of individual transfusion triggers to better determine who benefits from blood. J Trauma 2011; 70 (4) 794-801
- 11 Horst J, Leonard JC, Vogel A, Jacobs R, Spinella PC. A survey of US and Canadian hospitals' paediatric massive transfusion protocol policies. Transfus Med 2016; 26 (1) 49-56
- 12 Nunez TC, Voskresensky IV, Dossett LA, Shinall R, Dutton WD, Cotton BA. Early prediction of massive transfusion in trauma: simple as ABC (assessment of blood consumption)?. J Trauma 2009; 66 (2) 346-352
- 13 Acker SN, Ross JT, Partrick DA, Tong S, Bensard DD. Pediatric specific shock index accurately identifies severely injured children. J Pediatr Surg 2015; 50 (2) 331-334
- 14 Kleigman RM, Nelson WE. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 19th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2011
- 15 US Dept of HHS, Pediatric Basic and Advanced life support: Available at: http://chemm.nlm.nih.gov/pals.htm#sec2 . Accessed December 28, 2016
- 16 Bledsoe BE, Porter RS, Shade BR , et al. Paramedic Emergency Medicine. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Brady, Prentice Hall Division; 1994
- 17 Callcut RA, Cripps MW, Nelson MF, Conroy AS, Robinson BB, Cohen MJ. The massive transfusion score as a decision aid for resuscitation: learning when to turn the massive transfusion protocol on and off. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2016; 80 (3) 450-456
- 18 Neff LP, Cannon JW, Morrison JJ, Edwards MJ, Spinella PC, Borgman MA. Clearly defining pediatric massive transfusion: cutting through the fog and friction with combat data. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015; 78 (1) 22-28 , discussion 28–29