Sequential O-Arylation/Lanthanide(III)-Catalyzed [3,3]-Sigmatropic Rearrangement of Bromo-Substituted Allylic Alcohols

Timothy R. Ramadhar; Jun-ichi Kawakami; Robert A. Batey

doi:10.1055/s-0036-1590890

Synlett, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Synlett 2017; 28(20): 2865-2870
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1590890

letter

Sequential O-Arylation/Lanthanide(III)-Catalyzed [3,3]-Sigmatropic Rearrangement of Bromo-Substituted Allylic Alcohols

Timothy R. Ramadhar

Davenport Research Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, 80 St. George St., Toronto, ON, M5S 3H6, Canada eMail: rbatey@chem.utoronto.ca

,

Jun-ichi Kawakami

Davenport Research Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, 80 St. George St., Toronto, ON, M5S 3H6, Canada eMail: rbatey@chem.utoronto.ca

,

Robert A. Batey*

Davenport Research Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, 80 St. George St., Toronto, ON, M5S 3H6, Canada eMail: rbatey@chem.utoronto.ca

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik

Dedicated to the Cardinal Chemist, the inimitable Prof. Victor Snieckus, on the occasion of his 80th birthday

Abstract

Lanthanide(III)-catalyzed aryl-Claisen rearrangement of substrates bearing halo-substituted allyl groups, specifically 2-bromoallyl aryl ethers, afford ortho-2-bromoallylphenols. Aryl ether substrates were synthesized from brominated allylic alcohols via Mitsunobu reaction, Cu(II)-catalyzed arylation using potassium aryltrifluoroborate salts, or S_NAr reaction. Aryl-Claisen rearrangements proceeded in moderate to excellent yields using Eu(III) catalysis. The alkenylbromide functionality remains intact, illustrating the compatibility of synthetically important alkenylhalides during C–O/C–C σ-bond migration processes. Subsequent derivatization of the ortho-2-bromoallylphenol products through O-alkylation or C-arylation/alkenylation via Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling demonstrate the potential to access densely-functionalized molecules.

Key words

aryl-Claisen [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement - alkenylbromide - arylation - organotrifluoroborate salt - lanthanide catalysis - phenols - Suzuki–Miyaura reaction - Chan–Lam–Evans arylation

Volltext

Referenzen

References and Notes
1 Koh MJ. Nguyen TT. Zhang H. Schrock RR. Hoveyda AH. Nature (London, U.K.) 2016; 531: 459 ; and references cited therein
2 Johansson Seechurn CC. C. Kitching MO. Colacot TJ. Snieckus V. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 5062

3a Tucker CE. Majid TN. Knochel P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992; 114: 3983
3b Klatt T. Markiewicz JT. Sämann C. Knochel P. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 79: 4253
3c Yanagisawa A. In Science of Synthesis, 7: Category 1, Organometallics . Yamamoto H. Thieme; Stuttgart: 2004: 527

See, for example:

4a Duspara PA. Batey RA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 10862
4b Rosocha G. Batey RA. Tetrahedron 2013; 69: 8758
4c Taylor RR. R. Batey RA. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 78: 1404
4d Ramadhar TR. Batey RA. Comp. Theor. Chem. 2011; 976: 167
4e Ramadhar TR. Batey RA. Comp. Theor. Chem. 2011; 974: 76
4f Smith CD. Gavrilyuk JI. Lough AJ. Batey RA. J. Org. Chem. 2010; 75: 702
4g Rodrigues A. Lee EE. Batey RA. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 260
4h Smith CD. Rosocha G. Mui L. Batey RA. J. Org. Chem. 2010; 75: 4716
4i Smith CD. Batey RA. Tetrahedron 2008; 64: 652
4j Li S.-W. Batey RA. Chem. Commun. 2007; 3759
4k Lee EE. Batey RA. J. Am Chem. Soc. 2005; 127: 14887
4l Miller CA. Batey RA. Org. Lett. 2004; 6: 699

5a Castro AM. M. Chem. Rev. 2004; 104: 2939
5b Ichikawa H. Maruoka K. In The Claisen Rearrangement: Methods and Applications . Hiersemann M. Nubbemeyer U. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2007. Chap. 3.1, 45-8

6 For a review on the utility of dibromocyclopropane ring-opening reactions, see: Halton B. Harvey J. Synlett 2006; 1975
7 Gowrisankar S. Sergeev AG. Anbarasan P. Spannenberg A. Neumann H. Beller M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 11592 ; and references cited therein

8a Chan DM. T. Monaco KL. Wang RP. Winters MP. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998; 39: 2933
8b Evans DA. Katz JL. West TR. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998; 39: 2937
8c Lam PY. S. Clark CG. Saubern S. Adams J. Winters MP. Chan DM. T. Combs A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998; 39: 2941
8d Evano G. Blanchard N. Toumi M. Chem. Rev. 2008; 108: 3054

9 Quach TD. Batey RA. Org. Lett. 2003; 5: 1381

10a Fletcher S. Org. Chem. Front. 2015; 2: 739
10b Swamy KC. K. Kumar NN. B. Balaraman E. Kumar KV. P. P. Chem. Rev. 2009; 109: 2551
10c Hughes DL. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 1996; 28: 127

11 Terrier F. Modern Nucleophilic Aromatic Substitution. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2013
12 Reaction of phenols with allylic mesylates has also been used, see: Yagoubi M. Cruz AC. F. Nichols PL. Elliott RL. Willis MC. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010; 49: 7958
13 Ramadhar TR. Kawakami J. Lough AJ. Batey RA. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 4446
14 For a review of catalysis of the Claisen rearrangement, see: Majumdar KC. Alam S. Chattopadhyay B. Tetrahedron 2008; 64: 597
15 Trost BM. Toste FD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998; 120: 815

Isolated examples of aryl-Claisen [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement of simple acyclic 2-bromoallyl aryl ethers have been reported, see:

16a Parker KA. Casteel DA. J. Org. Chem. 1988; 53: 2847 ; PhNMe₂, Δ, reflux
16b Yoo S. Lee S.-H. Kim S.-K. Lee S.-H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1997; 5: 445 ; BCl₃, -40 °C
16c Ndungu JM. Larson KK. Sarpong R. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 5845 ; Et₂AlCl, rt
16d Goundry WR. F. Lee V. Baldwin JE. Synlett 2006; 2407 ; PhNEt₂, Δ, 200 °C
16e Lee S. Yi KY. Lee BH. Oh KS. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2012; 33: 1147 ; DMF, Δ, 200 °C
16f Parsons PJ. JonesD R. Walsh LJ. Allen LA. T. Onwubiko A. Preece L. Board J. White AJ. P. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 2533 ; H₂O, Δ, 195 °C

17 General Procedure for O-Aryl 2-Bromoallylic Ether Synthesis via Cu(II)-Catalyzed Arylation A suspension of ArBF₃K, Cu(OAc)₂·H₂O (10 mol%), DMAP (20 mol%), and powdered 4Å MS in CH₂Cl₂ was stirred at rt for 5 min. To this suspension was added alcohol 6. The mixture was stirred at rt for 60–72 h under an O₂ atmosphere. Subsequently, the mixture was filtered through a pad of Celite, and the filtrate was concentrated in vacuo. The resultant crude mixture was purified using flash column chromatography on silica gel to afford aryl ether 7. Example Reaction of 6a (0.250 g, 1.4 mmol) with 4-FC₆H₄BF₃K (0.601 g (95% purity), 2.8 mmol) using the general procedure afforded 7c (0.171 g, 45%) as a clear oil. Analytical Data for Compound 7c R_f = 0.43 (5% EtOAc/hexanes). IR (thin film): ν_max = 3073, 3051, 2945, 2934, 2866, 2834, 1647, 1601, 1505, 1439, 1368, 1240, 1202, 1090, 1057, 999, 974, 914, 826, 785, 725 cm^–1. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.00–6.94 (4 H, m), 6.38 (1 H, dd, J = 5.0, 3.0 Hz), 4.64–4.62 (1 H, m), 2.27–2.19 (1 H, m), 2.14–2.04 (1 H, m), 1.86–1.74 (2 H, m), 1.70–1.61 (1 H, m). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 158.0 (d, ¹ J _CF = 239.5 Hz), 154.4 (d, ⁴ J _CF = 2.5 Hz), 135.0, 121.2, 118.6 (d, ³ J _CF = 8.0 Hz), 116.1 (d, ² J _CF = 23.0 Hz), 78.0, 29.3, 28.0, 16.8. ¹⁹F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = –123.41 (m). LRMS (EI⁺): m/z (rel. intensity) = 272 (5), 270 (5) [M]⁺, 161 (14), 160 (93), 159 (17), 158 (94), 112 (78), 79 (100). HRMS (EI⁺): m/z calcd for C₁₂H₁₂OFBr [M]⁺: 270.0056; found: 270.0061.
18 General Procedure for the Aryl-Claisen Rearrangement of O-Aryl 2-Bromoallylic Ethers 7 to 8 A mixture of aryl ether 7 and Eu(fod)₃ (5 mol%) in PhMe was stirred at 120–130 °C in a sealed tube for 24 h under an atmosphere of argon. The mixture was directly purified (without removal of the solvent under reduced pressure) by flash column chromatography on silica gel (gradient: hexanes – 25% EtOAc/ hexanes) to afford phenol 8. Example Reaction of 7c (0.050 g, 0.18 mmol) using the general procedure afforded 8c (0.048 g, 96%) as a white solid. Data for Compound 8c Mp 52–53 °C (EtOAc/hexanes); R_f = 0.53 (25% EtOAc/hexanes). IR (thin film with CDCl₃): ν_max = 3468 (br), 2928, 2860, 1644, 1620, 1597, 1504, 1434, 1332, 1260, 1172 cm^–1. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 6.89 (1 H, dd, J = 9.5, 3.0 Hz), 6.82 (1 H, ddd, J = 8.5, 8.0, 3.0 Hz), 6.70 (1 H, dd, J = 8.5, 4.5 Hz), 6.40 (1 H, ddd, J = 4.0, 4.0, 1.5 Hz), 4.81 (1 H, br s), 4.02–3.99 (1 H, m), 2.26–2.13 (2 H, m), 2.11–2.03 (1 H, m), 1.90–1.83 (1 H, m), 1.63–1.52 (2 H, m). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 157.4 (d, ¹ J _CF = 237.5 Hz), 149.3 (d, ⁴ J _CF = 2.5 Hz), 133.2, 131.0 (d, ³ J _CF = 6.5 Hz), 123.5, 116.6 (d, ³ J _CF = 8.0 Hz), 116.4 (d, ² J _CF = 24.0 Hz), 114.1 (d, ² J _CF = 23.0 Hz), 44.0, 31.1, 27.9, 18.0. ¹⁹F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = –123.9 (ddd, J _FH = 8.5, 8.5, 4.5 Hz). LRMS (EI⁺): m/z (rel. intensity) = 272 (5), 270 (6) [M]⁺, 191 (39), 163 (29), 149 (16), 133 (11), 125 (13), 109 (10), 86 (73), 84 (100). HRMS (EI⁺): m/z calcd for C₁₂H₁₂OBrF [M]⁺: 270.0056; found: 270.0059.
19 CCDC 1558909 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. The data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/getstructures.
20 Molander GA. Felix LA. J. Org. Chem. 2005; 70: 3950
21 Old DW. Wolfe JP. Buchwald SL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998; 120: 9722
22 Bartoli G. Bosco M. Carlone A. Dalpozzo R. Locatelli M. Melchiorre P. Sambri L. J. Org. Chem. 2006; 71: 9580

Zusatzmaterial

Supporting Information