Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33(03): 173-178
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1594297
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Increased Lower Extremity Venous Stasis May Contribute to Deep Venous Thrombosis Formation after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction—An Ultrasonographic Study

Arash Momeni
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health Systems, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Michael G. Tecce
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health Systems, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Michael A. Lanni
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health Systems, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Shagun Aggarwal
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health Systems, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Christopher Pannucci
3   Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
,
Stephen J. Kovach
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health Systems, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Suhail K. Kanchwala
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health Systems, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Liza C. Wu
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health Systems, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Joseph M. Serletti
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health Systems, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

15 August 2016

08 October 2016

Publication Date:
28 November 2016 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Despite guideline-compliant prophylaxis, an increased rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) formation has been reported following autologous versus implant-based breast reconstruction. We hypothesized that tight abdominal fascia closure might decrease lower extremity venous return and promote venous stasis.

Methods An observational crossover study of patients who underwent autologous breast reconstruction using transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous/deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps was conducted. Ultrasonographic measurements of the left common femoral vein (CFV) and right internal jugular vein (IJV) were performed preoperatively, in the postanesthesia care unit, and on postoperative day (POD) 1. Parameters of interest included vessel diameter, circumference, area, and maximum flow velocity.

Results Eighteen patients with a mean age and body mass index of 52.7 years (range, 29–76 years) and 31.3 kg/m2 (range, 21.9–43.4 kg/m2) were included, respectively. A 29.8% increase in CFV diameter was observed on POD 1 (p < 0.0001). Similarly, a 24.3 and 69.9% increase in CFV circumference (p = 0.0007) and area (p < 0.0001) were noted, respectively. These correlated with a 28.4% decrease in maximum flow velocity in the CFV (p = 0.0001). Of note, none of these parameters displayed significant changes for the IJV, thus indicating that observed changes in the CFV were not the result of changes in perioperative fluid status.

Conclusion Postoperative changes observed in the CFV reflect increased lower extremity venous stasis after microsurgical breast reconstruction and may contribute to postoperative DVT formation.

Keywords

plastic surgery - breast reconstruction - DVT
 

  • References

  • 1 Alderman AK, Kuhn LE, Lowery JC, Wilkins EG. Does patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction change over time? Two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204 (1) 7-12
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Christensen BO, Overgaard J, Kettner LO, Damsgaard TE. Long-term evaluation of postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Acta Oncol 2011; 50 (7) 1053-1061
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Yueh JH, Slavin SA, Adesiyun T , et al. Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (6) 1585-1595
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Momeni A, Kim RY, Heier M, Bannasch H, Stark GB. Abdominal wall strength: a matched-pair analysis comparing muscle-sparing TRAM flap donor-site morbidity with the effects of abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (5) 1454-1459
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Hartrampf CR, Scheflan M, Black PW. Breast reconstruction with a transverse abdominal island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982; 69 (2) 216-225
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Holmström H. The free abdominoplasty flap and its use in breast reconstruction. An experimental study and clinical case report. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 13 (3) 423-427
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris T, Momen B. Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (2) 436-444 ; discussion 445–436
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Allen RJ, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1994; 32 (1) 32-38
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Butz DR, Lapin B, Yao K , et al. Advanced age is a predictor of 30-day complications after autologous but not implant-based postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (2) 253e-261e
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Lin IC, Nelson JA, Wu LC, Kovach III SJ, Serletti JM. Assessing surgical and medical complications in bilateral abdomen-based free flap breast reconstructions compared with unilateral free flap breast reconstructions. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 77 (1) 61-66
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Losken A, Carlson GW, Jones GE, Hultman CS, Culbertson JH, Bostwick III J. Significance of intraabdominal compartment pressures following TRAM flap breast reconstruction and the correlation of results. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (7) 2257-2264
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Losken A, Carlson GW, Tyrone JW , et al. The significance of intraabdominal compartment pressure after free versus pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (1) 261-263
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Enajat M, Damen TH, Geenen A, Timman R, van der Hulst RR, Mureau MA. Pulmonary embolism after abdominal flap breast reconstruction: prediction and prevention. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (6) 1213-1222
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Lee JS, Son BH, Choi HS , et al. Pulmonary thromboembolism following mastectomy with immediate TRAM in the patients with breast cancer: a prospective study. J Breast Cancer 2006; 9 (4) 354-360 . Available at http://synapse.koreamed.org/DOIx.php?id=10.4048/jbc.2006.9.4.354
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 2013 ASPS Plastic Surgery Statistics Report. Available at: http://wwwplasticsurgeryorg/Documents/news-resources/statistics/2013-statistics/reconstructive-procedures-demographicspdf . Accessed April 15, 2016
    PubMed
  • 16 Lang JE, Summers DE, Cui H , et al. Trends in post-mastectomy reconstruction: a SEER database analysis. J Surg Oncol 2013; 108 (3) 163-168
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Subichin MP, Patel NV, Wagner DS. Method of breast reconstruction determines venous thromboembolism risk better than current prediction models. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015; 3 (5) e397
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Pannucci CJ, Alderman AK, Brown SL, Wakefield TW, Wilkins EG. The effect of abdominal wall plication on intra-abdominal pressure and lower extremity venous flow: a case report. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (3) 392-394
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Huang GJ, Bajaj AK, Gupta S, Petersen F, Miles DA. Increased intraabdominal pressure in abdominoplasty: delineation of risk factors. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (4) 1319-1325
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Berjeaut RH, Nahas FX, Dos Santos LK, Filho JD, Ferreira LM. Does the use of compression garments increase venous stasis in the common femoral vein?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (1) 85e-91e
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Masoomi H, Paydar KZ, Wirth GA, Aly A, Kobayashi MR, Evans GR. Predictive risk factors of venous thromboembolism in autologous breast reconstruction surgery. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 72 (1) 30-33
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Shubinets V, Fox JP, Sarik JR, Kovach SJ, Fischer JP. Surgically treated hernia following abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction: prevalence, outcomes, and expenditures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (3) 749-757
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Boehmler IV JH, Butler CE, Ensor J, Kronowitz SJ. Outcomes of various techniques of abdominal fascia closure after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (3) 773-781
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar