Rhytidoplasty: SMAS Imbrication Vector Comparison

Abstract

To determine if there are aesthetic differences in patients who have undergone a SMAS lifting with predominantly oblique-horizontal vectors versus predominantly oblique-vertical vectors. To determine if there are aesthetic differences in the results of the neck using sutures placed in specific areas of the platysmal muscle versus randomly placed sutures for platysmal plication to the mastoid. Comparative, retrospective, blind, and randomized study. Evaluation of preoperative and postoperative photographs of 54 patients who underwent predominantly oblique-horizontal SMAS lifting versus 53 patients who underwent predominantly oblique-vertical traction of the SMAS flap, reviewed by three external, unbiased facial plastic surgeons in a blind study. A 7-point scale was used to grade the improvement of the face and the neck. In the face, SMAS lifting with predominantly oblique-vertical vectors used during the procedure offer statistically better results (p ≤ 0.001) in comparison to predominantly oblique-horizontal vectors in the aesthetical improvement of the malar eminence, melolabial fold and jowls. In the neck, both techniques offer excellent results, but the sutures used for platysmal plication in specific areas offer no statistical differences in aesthetical results from those sutures that are randomly placed in the platysmal muscle. In our study of 107 patients, SMAS lifting using predominantly oblique-vertical vectors seem to have better results than using predominantly oblique-horizontal vectors. For the neck, we do not find statistical differences between randomly placed sutures for platysmal plication versus sutures placed in specific areas of the muscle.

Keywords

rhytidoplasty - facelift - neck lift - SMAS - vectors

• References

• 1 Hamra ST. The deep-plane rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86 (1) 53-61 , discussion 62–63
• 2 Hamra ST. Composite rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90 (1) 1-13
• 3 Baker TJ, Gordon HL. Surgical Rejuvenation of the Face 1st ed. Mosby; 1986: 101-244
• 4 Baker TJ, Gordon HL, Stuzin JM. Surgical Rejuvenation of the Face. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1996: 254-267
• 5 Webster RC, Smith RC, Papsidero MJ, Karolow WW, Smith KF. Comparison of SMAS plication with SMAS imbrication in face lifting. Laryngoscope 1982; 92 (8 Pt 1): 901-912
• 6 Webster RC, Davidson TM, White MF, Bush JE, Smith RC. Conservative face lift surgery. Arch Otolaryngol 1976; 102 (11) 657-662
• 7 Webster R, Beeson W, McCollough G. Facelift in Aesthetic Surgery of the Aging Face. Edit Mosby; 1986: 71-128
• 8 McCollough EG, Scurry Jr WC, Shirazi MA. The “midface-lift” as a misnomer for correctly identifying procedures designed to lift and rejuvenate the cheeks and malar regions of the face. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2009; 11 (4) 257-262
• 9 Tonnard P, Verpaele A, Monstrey S , et al. Minimal access cranial suspension lift: a modified S-lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (6) 2074-2086
• 10 Verpaele A, Tonnard P. Lower third of the face: indications and limitations of the minimal access cranial suspension lift. Clin Plast Surg 2008; 35 (4) 645-659 , vii
• 11 Mendelson BC. Surgery of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system: principles of release, vectors, and fixation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107 (6) 1545-1552 , discussion 1553–1555, 1556–1557, 1558–1561
• 12 Cárdenas-Camarena L, González LE. Multiple, combined plications of the SMAS-platysma complex: breaking down the face-aging vectors. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (4) 1093-1100 , discussion 1101–1102
• 13 Pedroza F, Pedroza LF, Desio ED, Revelli VE. Cervicofacial rhytidectomy without notorious scars: experience of 29 years. Facial Plast Surg 2013; 29 (3) 233-243
• 14 Stuzin J M. MOC-PSSM CME Article: Face Lifting. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121: 1
• 15 Thorne CH. Facelift. Grabb and Smith's Plastic Surgery. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007: 498-508
• 16 Adamson PA, Dahiya R, Litner J. Midface effects of the deep-plane vs the superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication face-lift. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2007; 9 (1) 9-11
• 17 Labbé D, Franco RG, Nicolas J. Platysma suspension and platysmaplasty during neck lift: anatomical study and analysis of 30 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (6) 2001-2007 , discussion 2008–2010
• 18 Ivy EJ, Lorenc ZP, Aston SJ. Is there a difference? A prospective study comparing lateral and standard SMAS face lifts with extended SMAS and composite rhytidectomies. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 98 (7) 1135-1143 , discussion 1144–1147