Semantic Treatments for Word and Sentence Production Deficits in Aphasia

Abstract

The cognitive domains of language and memory are intrinsically connected and work together during language processing. This relationship is especially apparent in the area of semantics. Several disciplines have contributed to a rich store of data about semantic organization and processing, and several semantic treatments for aphasic word and sentence production impairments have been based on these data. This article reviews the relationships between semantics and memory as they relate to word and sentence production, describes the aphasic language impairments that result from deficits in these areas, and summarizes treatment approaches that capitalize on what we have learned about these domains and how they work together.

Keywords

Semantics - language - cognition - memory - aphasia rehabilitation

• References

• 1 Van Dyke JA. The role of memory in language and communication. In: Peach RK, Shapiro LP, , eds. Cognition and Acquired Language Disorders: An Information Processing Approach. St. Louis, MI: Elsevier; 2012: 94-120
• 2 Eustache F, Viard A, Desgranges B. The MNESIS model: memory systems and processes, identity and future thinking. Neuropsychologia 2016; 87: 96-109
• 3 Davis GA. The cognition of language and communication. In: Peach RK, Shapiro LP, , eds. Cognition and Acquired Language Disorders: An Information Processing Approach. St. Louis, MI: Elsevier; 2012: 1-12
• 4 McKoon G, Ratcliff R, Dell GS. A critical evaluation of the semantic-episodic distinction. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1986; 12 (2) 295-306
• 5 McRae K, Ferretti TR, Amyote L. Thematic roles as verb-specific concepts. Lang Cogn Process 1997; 12: 137-176
• 6 Ferretti TR, Kutas M, McRae K. Verb aspect and the activation of event knowledge. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2007; 33 (1) 182-196
• 7 Ferretti TR, McRae K, Hatherall A. Integrating verbs, situation schemas, and thematic role concepts. J Mem Lang 2001; 44: 516-547
• 8 Poirier J, Shapiro LP. Linguistic and psycholinguistic foundations. In: Peach RK, Shapiro LP, , eds. Cognition and Acquired Language Disorders: An Information Processing Approach. St. Louis, MI: Elsevier; 2012: 121-146
• 9 Ullman MT. Contributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model. Cognition 2004; 92 (1–2): 231-270
• 10 Baddeley A. Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annu Rev Psychol 2012; 63: 1-29
• 11 Grondin R, Lupker SJ, McRae K. Shared features dominate semantic richness effects for concrete concepts. J Mem Lang 2009; 60 (1) 1-19
• 12 Maki WS, Krimsky M, Muñoz S. An efficient method for estimating semantic similarity based on feature overlap: reliability and validity of semantic feature ratings. Behav Res Methods 2006; 38 (1) 153-157
• 13 Rogers TT, McClelland JL. Précis of semantic cognition: a parallel distributed processing approach. . Behav Brain Sci 2008; 31: 689-749
• 14 McRae K, Cree GS, Seidenberg MS, McNorgan C. Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behav Res Methods 2005; 37 (4) 547-559
• 15 Boyle M. Semantic feature analysis treatment for aphasic word retrieval impairments: what's in a name?. Top Stroke Rehabil 2010; 17 (6) 411-422
• 16 Dell GS, Schwartz MF, Martin N, Saffran EM, Gagnon DA. Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychol Rev 1997; 104 (4) 801-838
• 17 Levelt WJM. Spoken word production: a theory of lexical access. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98 (23) 13464-13471
• 18 Martin N. Disorders of word production. In: Papathanasiou I, Coppens P, , eds. Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Communication Disorders. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2017: 169-194
• 19 Martin R, Slevc LR. Memory disorders and impaired language and communication. In: Peach RK, Shapiro LP, , eds. Cognition and Acquired Language Disorders: An Information Processing Approach. St. Louis, MI: Elsevier; 2012: 181-201
• 20 Vigliocco G, Vinson DP, Lewis W, Garrett MF. Representing the meanings of object and action words: the featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis. Cognit Psychol 2004; 48 (4) 422-488
• 21 Vinson DP, Vigliocco G. Semantic feature production norms for a large set of objects and events. Behav Res Methods 2008; 40 (1) 183-190
• 22 McRae K, Matsuki K. People use their knowledge of common events to understand language, and do so as quickly as possible. Lang Linguist Compass 2009; 3 (6) 1417-1429
• 23 Wunderlich D, Lakämper R. On the interaction of structural and semantic case. Lingua 2001; 111: 277-418
• 24 Kircher TTJ, Brammer MJ, Levelt W, Bartels M, McGuire PK. Pausing for thought: engagement of left temporal cortex during pauses in speech. Neuroimage 2004; 21 (1) 84-90
• 25 Peach RK. The cognitive basis for sentence planning difficulties in discourse after traumatic brain injury. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2013; 22 (2) S285-S297
• 26 Rumelhart D, Norman D. The active structural network. In: Norman C, Rumelhart D, eds. Explorations in Cognition. San Francisco, CA: Freeman and Sons; 1975: 35-64
• 27 Garrett MF. Processes in language production. In: Newmeyer FJ, ed. Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey: III Language: Psychological and Biological Aspects. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1988: 69-96
• 28 Loverso FL, Prescott TE, Selinger M. Cueing verbs: a treatment strategy for aphasic adults (CVT). J Rehabil Res Dev 1988; 25 (2) 47-60
• 29 Edmonds LA. A review of verb network strengthening treatment: theory, methods, results, and clinical implications. Top Lang Disord 2016; 36: 123-135
• 30 Rochon E, Laird L, Bose A, Scofield J. Mapping therapy for sentence production impairments in nonfluent aphasia. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2005; 15 (1) 1-36
• 31 Ylvisaker M, Szekeres S. Cognitive-language intervention with brain-injured adolescents and adults. Paper presented at: Annual Convention of the Illinois Speech-Language-Hearing Association; November 1985; Chicago, IL
• 32 Harbauer-Krupa J, Moser L, Smith G, Sullivan DM, Szekeres SF. Cognitive rehabilitation therapy: late stages of recovery. In: Ylvisaker M, , ed. Head Injury Rehabilitation: Children and Adolescents. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press; 1985: 311-340
• 33 Boyle M. Semantic feature analysis treatment for anomia in two fluent aphasia syndromes. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2004; 13 (3) 236-249
• 34 Boyle M, Coelho CA. Application of semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 1995; 4: 94-98
• 35 Coelho CA, McHugh R, Boyle M. Semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia: a replication. Aphasiology 2000; 14: 133-142
• 36 Davis LA, Stanton ST. Semantic feature analysis as a functional therapy tool. Contemp Issues Commun Sci Disord 2005; 32: 85-92
• 37 Gordon J. A contextual approach to facilitating word retrieval in agrammatic aphasia. Aphasiology 2007; 21: 643-657
• 38 Hashimoto N, Frome A. The use of a modified semantic features analysis approach in aphasia. J Commun Disord 2011; 44 (4) 459-469
• 39 Lowell S, Beeson PM, Holland AL. The efficacy of a semantic cueing procedure on naming performance of adults with aphasia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 1995; 4: 109-114
• 40 Marcotte K, Ansaldo AI. The neural correlates of semantic feature analysis in chronic aphasia: discordant patterns according to the etiology. Semin Speech Lang 2010; 31 (1) 52-63
• 41 Massarro M, Tompkins CA. Feature analysis for treatment of communication disorders in traumatically brain-injured patients: an efficacy study. Clinical Aphasiology 1994; 22: 245-256
• 42 Rider JD, Wright HH, Marshall RC, Page JL. Using semantic feature analysis to improve contextual discourse in adults with aphasia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2008; 17 (2) 161-172
• 43 Wambaugh JL, Mauszycki S, Cameron R, Wright S, Nessler C. Semantic feature analysis: incorporating typicality treatment and mediating strategy training to promote generalization. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2013; 22 (2) S334-S369
• 44 Maddy KM, Capilouto GJ, McComas KL. The effectiveness of semantic feature analysis: an evidence-based systematic review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2014; 57 (4) 254-267
• 45 Peach RK, Reuter KA. A discourse-based approach to semantic feature analysis for the treatment of aphasic word retrieval failures. Aphasiology 2010; 24: 971-990
• 46 Wambaugh JL, Ferguson M. Application of semantic feature analysis to retrieval of action names in aphasia. J Rehabil Res Dev 2007; 44 (3) 381-394
• 47 Antonucci SM. Use of semantic feature analysis in group aphasia treatment. Aphasiology 2009; 23: 854-866
• 48 Falconer C, Antonucci SM. Use of semantic feature analysis in group discourse treatment for aphasia: extension and expansion. Aphasiology 2012; 26: 64-82
• 49 Boo M, Rose ML. The efficacy of repetition, semantic, and gesture treatments for verb retrieval and use in Broca's aphasia. Aphasiology 2011; 25: 154-175
• 50 Wambaugh JL, Mauszycki S, Wright S. Semantic feature analysis: application to confrontation naming of actions in aphasia. Aphasiology 2014; 28: 1-24
• 51 Edmonds LA, Kiran S. Effect of semantic naming treatment on crosslinguistic generalization in bilingual aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2006; 49 (4) 729-748
• 52 Kiran S, Roberts PM. Semantic feature analysis treatment in Spanish-English and French-English bilingual aphasia. Aphasiology 2010; 24: 231-261
• 53 Bransford JD, Franks JJ, Morris CD, Stein BS. Some general constraints on learning and memory research. In: Cermak LS, Craik FIM, , eds. Levels of Processing in Human Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 1979: 331-354
• 54 Bentin S, Kutas M, Hillyard SA. Electrophysiological evidence for task effects on semantic priming in auditory word processing. Psychophysiology 1993; 30 (2) 161-169
• 55 Chwilla DJ, Brown CM, Hagoort P. The N400 as a function of the level of processing. Psychophysiology 1995; 32 (3) 274-285
• 56 Kiang M, Christensen BK, Zipursky RB. Depth-of-processing effects on semantic activation deficits in schizophrenia: an electrophysiological investigation. Schizophr Res 2011; 133 1–3: 91-98
• 57 Faroqi-Shah Y, Graham LE. Treatment of semantic verb classes in aphasia: acquisition and generalization effects. Clin Linguist Phon 2011; 25 (5) 399-418
• 58 Loverso FL, Selinger M, Prescott TE. Application of verbing strategies for aphasia treatment. Clinical Aphasiology 1979; 9: 229-238
• 59 Prescott TE, Selinger M, Loverso FL. An analysis of learning, generalization, and maintenance of verbs by an aphasic patient. Clinical Aphasiology 1982; 12: 178-182
• 60 Selinger M, Prescott TE, Loverso F, Fuller K. Below the 50th percentile: application of the verb as core model. Clinical Aphasiology 1987; 17: 55-63
• 61 Edmonds LA. Tutorial for verb network strengthening treatment (VNeST): detailed description of the treatment protocol with corresponding theoretical rationale. Perspect Neurophysiol Neurogenic Speech Lang Disord 2014; 24: 78-88
• 62 Martin N, Fink RB, Renvall K, Laine M. Effectiveness of contextual repetition priming treatments for anomia depends on intact access to semantics. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2006; 12 (6) 853-866
• 63 Schwartz MF, Saffran EM, Find RB, Myers JL, Martin N. Mapping therapy: a treatment programme for agrammatism. Aphasiology 1994; 8: 19-54