RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1597569
Microsurgery Fellowship Selection Criteria: A National Program Director Survey
Publikationsverlauf
24. August 2016
20. Oktober 2016
Publikationsdatum:
15. Dezember 2016 (online)
Abstract
Background Desirable candidate characteristics for microsurgery fellowship applicants still remain unclear, as no data are available in the literature. This study aims to provide information on the criteria that are used to select and rank applicants for the microsurgery fellowship match.
Methods A 38-question survey was sent in April 2015 to all microsurgery fellowship directors (n = 36) involved in the U.S. match, using QuestionPro Software. The survey investigated various factors used for selection of applicants, including medical school, residency training, research experience, fellowship interview, and candidate characteristics. A 5-point Likert scale was used to grade 33 influential factors from 1 (“not at all important in making my decision”) to 5 (“essential in making my decision”), or for 5 controversial factors from 1 (“very negative impact in making my decision”) to 5 (“very positive impact in making my decision”).
Results A total of 53% (19 out of 36) of responses were received from microsurgery fellowship directors. The most important factors included letters of recommendations by microsurgeons (4.6 ± 0.5), interactions with faculty (4.6 ± 0.5), overall interview performance in the selection process (4.6 ± 0.5), and professionalism and ethics (4.4 ± 0.7). Factors that had a negative impact on the selection process included graduate from a non-U.S. plastic surgery residency program (2.1 ± 0.9), graduate needing a visa (2.3 ± 0.8), and graduate from a foreign medical school (2.4 ± 1.0).
Conclusion This study provides data on the microsurgery fellowship directors' perception of the criteria important for applicant selection and shows that the most valued criteria are letters of recommendation, interactions with faculty, and interview performance.
-
References
- 1 National Resident Matching Program, Data Release and Research Committee. Results of the 2014 NRMP Program Director Survey. National Resident Matching Program; Washington, DC: 2014
- 2 Janis JEMD, Hatef DAMD. Resident selection protocols in plastic surgery: a national survey of plastic surgery program directors. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (6) 1929-1939 , discussion 1940–1941
- 3 Harper JG, Given KS, Pettitt B, Losken A. The independent plastic surgery match: an in-depth analysis of the applicants and process. Ann Plast Surg 2011; 66 (5) 568-571
- 4 Nguyen AT, Janis JE. Resident selection protocols in plastic surgery: a national survey of plastic surgery independent program directors. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (2) 459-469
- 5 Grabowski G, Walker JW. Orthopaedic fellowship selection criteria: a survey of fellowship directors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (20) e154
- 6 Benzon HA, De Oliveira Jr GS, Jagannathan N, Suresh S. Selection of subspecialty fellows in anesthesia for pediatric anesthesia: a national survey of program directors in the United States. Paediatr Anaesth 2015; 25 (5) 487-491
- 7 Meyer DR, Dewan MA. Fellowship selection criteria in ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 26 (5) 357-359
- 8 Nies MS, Bollinger AJ, Cassidy C, Jebson PJL. Factors used by program directors to select hand surgery fellows. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (11) 2285-2288 .e5
- 9 San Francisco Residency and Fellowship Matching Services. Statistics—Microsurgery Fellowship Match. https://www.sfmatch.org/SpecialtyInsideAll.aspx?id=26&typ=1&name=Microsurgery# . Accessed January 8, 2016
- 10 Travis C, Taylor CA, Mayhew HE. Evaluating residency applicants: stable values in a changing market. Fam Med 1999; 31 (4) 252-256
- 11 Nagarkar P, Pulikkottil B, Patel A, Rohrich RJ. So you want to become a plastic surgeon? What you need to do and know to get into a plastic surgery residency. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (2) 419-422
- 12 National Resident Matching Program and Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates. Charting Outcomes in the Match for International Medical Graduates, 2014. National Resident Matching Program and Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates; 2014