RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1597592
A Simplified Technique for Drainage of Chronic Calcified Pleural Empyema
Publikationsverlauf
23. September 2016
06. November 2016
Publikationsdatum:
28. Januar 2017 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/thoracic/201707/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0036-1597592_164620h-1.jpg)
Abstract
Chronic pleural pocket has well-known diagnosis and treatment principles since first described by Hippocrates 2,400 years ago. However, its treatment remains constant even though its causes, severity during management, and terrain vary considerably. In well-structured health care systems, posttuberculous empyema has become rare; its well-codified medical treatment relies on early diagnosis and adapted antibiotherapy, punctures/drainage, and appropriate intrapleural antifibrinolytics. In developing countries, a poor health organizational system increases the incidence of pleural pocket, which can progress until surgery is indicated. In such a context, the general principles of treatment include pleural decortication along with pulmonary resection. This technique remains difficult, risky, and, sometimes, impossible due to the chronicity of the lesion. In patients debilitated by several months of septic evolution, a simplified thoracostomy technique permits complete resection of the pocket.
-
References
- 1 Rosenblatt MB. Pulmonary tuberculosis: evolution of modern therapy. Bull N Y Acad Med 1973; 49 (03) 163-196
- 2 Deslauriers J, Jacques LF, Grégoire J. Role of Eloesser flap and thoracoplasty in the third millennium. Chest Surg Clin N Am 2002; 12 (03) 605-623
- 3 Hertzog P, Toty L, Personne C, Riquet M. [Repair of long-term cavernostomies and parieto-pleurectomies using myoplasty and cutaneous autoplasty]. Ann Chir 1980; 34 (08) 631-635
- 4 Bellamy J, Onea F. Une technique simplifiée de pleurostomie. Chir Thor Cardiovasc 2011; 15: 56-59
- 5 Filomeno LT, Campos JR, Machuca TN, das Neves-Pereira JC, Terra RM. Prosthesis for open pleurostomy (POP): management for chronic empyemas. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2009; 64 (03) 203-208