J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33(04): 268-274
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1597835
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Segmental Latissimus Dorsi Free Flap Attempting to Preserve Function at the Donor Site: Anatomical and Clinical Experiences

YiChun Ding
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
,
Dong Sheng Cao
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
,
XueYing Huang
2   Department of Anatomy, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
,
Juan Xie
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
,
HongHong Li
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

13 July 2016

16 November 2016

Publication Date:
28 January 2017 (online)

Abstract

Background The purpose of the present study was to evaluate arm and shoulder function prospectively after transfer of the lateral segment of the latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle.

Methods In this study, 20 specimens of LD muscles from 10 cadavers were dissected to determine the relationship between the artery and the nerve. Twenty patients were recruited and functional disability was determined by the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), and muscle strength by needle electromyography (EMG) before surgery and at five different time points postoperatively.

Results Two specimens (10%) had no medial branch arising from the thoracodorsal artery. The pedicle length of the lateral branch was longer than that of the medial branch (mean 10.41 vs. 9.27 cm, p = 0.03). All DASH scores and EMG amplitudes at half a month postoperative decreased compared with those preoperatively, with no significant difference at 3 months postoperative.

Conclusion Lateral segmental LD muscle transfer, leaving the residual segment motor function intact, can be recommended as an alternative for moderate and small-size bone exposure wounds, especially in the lower extremities, that minimizes loss of donor-site function.

 
  • References

  • 1 Kim JT, Kim SW, Youn S, Kim YH. What is the ideal free flap for soft tissue reconstruction? A ten-year experience of microsurgical reconstruction using 334 latissimus dorsi flaps from a universal donor site. Ann Plast Surg 2015; 75 (1) 49-54
  • 2 Kawamura K, Yajima H, Kobata Y, Shigematsu K, Takakura Y. Anatomy of Y-shaped configurations in the subscapular arterial system and clinical application to harvesting flow-through flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116 (4) 1082-1089
  • 3 Adams Jr WP, Lipschitz AH, Ansari M, Kenkel JM, Rohrich RJ. Functional donor site morbidity following latissimus dorsi muscle flap transfer. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 53 (1) 6-11
  • 4 Munhoz AM, Montag E, Arruda EG, Sturtz G, Gemperli R. Management of giant inferior triangle lumbar hernia (Petit's triangle hernia): a rare complication following delayed breast reconstruction with extended latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap. Int J Surg Case Rep 2014; 5 (6) 319-323
  • 5 Angrigiani C, Grilli D, Siebert J. Latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap without muscle. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96 (7) 1608-1614
  • 6 Guerra AB, Metzinger SE, Lund KM, Cooper MM, Allen RJ, Dupin CL. The thoracodorsal artery perforator flap: clinical experience and anatomic study with emphasis on harvest techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114 (1) 32-41 , discussion 42–43
  • 7 Kim JT, Kim SW. Another option of perforator flap in the lateral thoracic area: lateral thoracic perforator flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (7) 443-450
  • 8 Schwabegger AH, Bodner G, Ninković M, Piza-Katzer H. Thoracodorsal artery perforator (TAP) flap: report of our experience and review of the literature. Br J Plast Surg 2002; 55 (5) 390-395
  • 9 Blondeel PN, Beyens G, Verhaeghe R , et al. Doppler flowmetry in the planning of perforator flaps. Br J Plast Surg 1998; 51 (3) 202-209
  • 10 Calderon W, Chang N, Mathes SJ. Comparison of the effect of bacterial inoculation in musculocutaneous and fasciocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 77 (5) 785-794
  • 11 Gosain A, Chang N, Mathes S, Hunt TK, Vasconez L. A study of the relationship between blood flow and bacterial inoculation in musculocutaneous and fasciocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86 (6) 1152-1162 , discussion 1163
  • 12 Bogduk N, Johnson G, Spalding D. The morphology and biomechanics of latissimus dorsi. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1998; 13 (6) 377-385
  • 13 Elliott LF, Raffel B, Wade J. Segmental latissimus dorsi free flap: clinical applications. Ann Plast Surg 1989; 23 (3) 231-238
  • 14 Bartlett SP, May Jr JW, Yaremchuk MJ. The latissimus dorsi muscle: a fresh cadaver study of the primary neurovascular pedicle. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981; 67 (5) 631-636
  • 15 Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 2001; 14 (2) 128-146
  • 16 Zhao L, Miao H, Wang W, Zhang D. The anatomy of the segmental latissimus dorsi flap for reconstruction of facial paralysis. Surg Radiol Anat 1994; 16 (3) 239-243
  • 17 Brooks D, Buntic RF. Partial muscle harvest: our first 100 cases attempting to preserve form and function at the donor site. Microsurgery 2008; 28 (8) 606-611
  • 18 Mathes SJ, Nahai F. Classification of the vascular anatomy of muscles: experimental and clinical correlation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981; 67 (2) 177-187
  • 19 Watanabe K, Kiyokawa K, Rikimaru H, Koga N, Yamaki K, Saga T. Anatomical study of latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap vascular distribution. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (7) 1091-1098
  • 20 Shi J, Xu B, Shen GF, Wang XD. Application of lateral thoracic flap in maxillofacial defect reconstruction: experience with 28 cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66 (10) 1369-1375
  • 21 Giordano S, Kääriäinen K, Alavaikko J, Kaistila T, Kuokkanen H. Latissimus dorsi free flap harvesting may affect the shoulder joint in long run. Scand J Surg 2011; 100 (3) 202-207
  • 22 Shamley DR, Srinanaganathan R, Weatherall R , et al. Changes in shoulder muscle size and activity following treatment for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007; 106 (1) 19-27
  • 23 Solway S, Beaton DE, Mcconnel S , et al. The DASH Outcome Measure User's Manual, 2nd ed. Toronto, Ontario: Institute for Work & Health; 2002
  • 24 Button J, Scott J, Taghizadeh R, Weiler-Mithoff E, Hart AM. Shoulder function following autologous latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction. A prospective three year observational study comparing quilting and non-quilting donor site techniques. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (9) 1505-1512
  • 25 Paolini G, Amoroso M, Pugliese P, Longo B, Santanelli F. Functional sequelae following bilateral mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap: medium-term follow-up. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2014; 48 (2) 99-103
  • 26 Schwartz M ed. The relationship between electromyography and muscle force. In: EMG Methods for Evaluating Muscle and Nerve Function. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech; 2012
  • 27 Glassey N, Perks GB, McCulley SJ. A prospective assessment of shoulder morbidity and recovery time scales following latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (5) 1334-1340
  • 28 Fraulin FO, Louie G, Zorrilla L, Tilley W. Functional evaluation of the shoulder following latissimus dorsi muscle transfer. Ann Plast Surg 1995; 35 (4) 349-355