Semin Thromb Hemost 2017; 43(2): 200-212
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1597900
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Fibrinolysis in Trauma: “Myth,” “Reality,” or “Something in Between”

Mark Walsh
1   Departments of Surgery and Emergency Medicine, Memorial Hospital Trauma Center, South Bend, Indiana
,
Jacob Shreve
1   Departments of Surgery and Emergency Medicine, Memorial Hospital Trauma Center, South Bend, Indiana
,
Scott Thomas
1   Departments of Surgery and Emergency Medicine, Memorial Hospital Trauma Center, South Bend, Indiana
,
Ernest Moore
2   Department of Surgery, Denver General Hospital, Denver, Colorado
,
Hunter Moore
2   Department of Surgery, Denver General Hospital, Denver, Colorado
,
Daniel Hake
1   Departments of Surgery and Emergency Medicine, Memorial Hospital Trauma Center, South Bend, Indiana
,
Tim Pohlman
1   Departments of Surgery and Emergency Medicine, Memorial Hospital Trauma Center, South Bend, Indiana
,
Patrick Davis
1   Departments of Surgery and Emergency Medicine, Memorial Hospital Trauma Center, South Bend, Indiana
3   Department of Otolaryngology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
,
Victoria Ploplis
4   W. M. Keck Center for Transgene Research, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana
,
Andres Piscoya
1   Departments of Surgery and Emergency Medicine, Memorial Hospital Trauma Center, South Bend, Indiana
5   Orthopaedic Residency Program, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
,
Julie Wegner
6   Department of Surgery, Midwestern University Clinic, University of Arizona, Glendale, Arizona
,
John Bryant
1   Departments of Surgery and Emergency Medicine, Memorial Hospital Trauma Center, South Bend, Indiana
,
Anton Crepinsek
1   Departments of Surgery and Emergency Medicine, Memorial Hospital Trauma Center, South Bend, Indiana
,
James Lantry
7   Department of Defense, ECMO Inpatient and Transport Programs, San Antonio Military Medicine Center/SAUSHEC, San Antonia, Texas
,
Forest Sheppard
8   Department Head, Expeditionary and Trauma Medicine, Naval Medical Research Unit, San Antonio, Texas
,
Francis Castellino
4   W. M. Keck Center for Transgene Research, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
20 February 2017 (online)

Preview

Abstract

The emphasis on fibrinolysis as an important contributor to trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) has led to a debate regarding the relative clinical significance of fibrinolysis in the setting of trauma. The debate has centered on two camps. The one camp defines fibrinolysis in trauma by standard coagulation tests as well as fibrin split products, D-dimers, and plasmin/antiplasmin levels. This camp favors a more liberal use of tranexamic acid and attributes more significance to hyperfibrinolysis in TIC. The other camp favors a definition of fibrinolysis based on the viscoelastic tests (VET), rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), and thromboelastography (TEG). These whole blood assays define hyperfibrinolysis at a higher threshold than plasma-based tests. Therefore, this VET camp reserves antifibrinolytic treatment for patients who demonstrate severe coagulopathy associated with hyperfibrinolysis. This bimodal attribution of the clinical relevance of fibrinolysis in trauma suggests that there may be an underlying “Myth” of the concept of TIC that was historically defined by plasma-based tests and a future “Reality” of the concept of TIC that is grounded on an understanding of TIC based on a VET-defined “fibrinolytic spectrum” of TIC. This narrative review explores this “Myth” and “Reality” of fibrinolysis in TIC and proposes a direction that will allow a “Future” interpretation of TIC that incorporates both the past “Myth” and present “Reality” of fibrinolysis TIC.