RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1599216
Patients at Increased Risk of Major Adverse Events Following Operative Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures: Inpatient versus Outpatient
Publikationsverlauf
14. Dezember 2016
23. Januar 2017
Publikationsdatum:
06. März 2017 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/jws/201703/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0037-1599216_1600129-1.jpg)
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare complication rates following inpatient versus outpatient distal radius fracture ORIF and identify specific complications that occur at increased rates among inpatients.
Methods Using the 2005–2013 ACS-NSQIP, we collected patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical characteristics, and 30-day postoperative complications following isolated ORIF of distal radius fractures. A propensity score matched design using an 8-to-1 “greedy” matching algorithm in a 1:4 ratio of inpatients to outpatients was utilized. Rates of minor, major, and total complications were compared. A multinomial logistic regression model was then used to assess the odds of complications following inpatient surgery.
Results Total 4,016 patients were identified, 776 (19.3%) of whom underwent inpatient surgery and 3,240 (80.3%) underwent outpatient surgery. The propensity score matching algorithm yielded a cohort of 629 inpatients who were matched with 2,516 outpatients (1:4 ratio). After propensity score matching, inpatient treatment was associated with increased rates of major and total complications but not with minor complications. There was an increased odds of major complications and total complications following inpatient surgery compared with outpatient surgery. There was no difference in odds of minor complications between groups.
Conclusion Inpatient operative treatment of distal radius fractures is associated with significantly increased rates of major and total complications compared with operative treatment as an outpatient. Odds of a major complication are six times higher and odds of total complications are two and a half times higher following inpatient distal radius ORIF compared with outpatient. Quality improvement measures should be specifically targeted to patients undergoing distal radius fracture ORIF in the inpatient setting.
Keywords
complications - distal radius - inpatient - open reduction and internal fixation - outpatientFunding
None.
-
References
- 1 National health expenditures highlights. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; 2012. http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/NationalHealthAccountsHistorical.html . Accessed on May, 16 2014
- 2 Bundled payment: AHA research synthesis report. American Hospital Association Committee on Research; 2010 http://www.aha.org/research/cor/content/BundledPayment.pdf . Accessed on May, 16 2014
- 3 Sood N, Huckfeldt PJ, Escarce JJ, Grabowski DC, Newhouse JP. Medicare's bundled payment pilot for acute and postacute care: analysis and recommendations on where to begin. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011; 30 (09) 1708-1717
- 4 Fact sheets: bundled payments for care improvement initiative fact sheet. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 2014 http://www.cms.gov/Newsroom?mediaReleaseDatabase/Fact-Sheets/2014-Fact-sheets-items/2014-01-30-2.html . Accessed May, 16 2014
- 5 Froimson MI, Rana A, White Jr RE. , et al. Bundled payments for care improvement initiative: the next evolution of payment formulations: AAHKS Bundled Payment Task Force. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (8, Suppl): 157-165
- 6 Altman SH. The lessons of Medicare's prospective payment system show that the bundled payment program faces challenges. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012; 31 (09) 1923-1930
- 7 Steele JR, Reilly JD. Bundled payments: bundled risk or bundled reward?. J Am Coll Radiol 2010; 7 (01) 43-49
- 8 Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury 2006; 37 (08) 691-697
- 9 Alffram PA, Bauer GC. Epidemiology of fractures of the forearm. A biomechanical investigation of bone strength. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1962; 44-A: 105-114
- 10 Schick CW, Koehler DM, Martin CT. , et al. Risk factors for 30-day postoperative complications and mortality following open reduction internal fixation of distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (12) 2373-2380.e1
- 11 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. User Guide for the Participant Use Data File; 2011. http://acsnsqip.org/main/programspecs/program_data_collection.jsp . Accessed October 4, 2013
- 12 Belmont Jr PJ, Davey S, Orr JD, Ochoa LM, Bader JO, Schoenfeld AJ. Risk factors for 30-day postoperative complications and mortality after below-knee amputation: a study of 2,911 patients from the national surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg 2011; 213 (03) 370-378
- 13 Martin CT, Pugely AJ, Gao Y, Wolf BR. Risk factors for thirty-day morbidity and mortality following knee arthroscopy: a review of 12,271 patients from the national surgical quality improvement program database. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (14) e98 (1–10):
- 14 Pugely AJ, Martin CT, Gao Y, Mendoza-Lattes S, Callaghan JJ. Differences in short-term complications between spinal and general anesthesia for primary total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (03) 193-199
- 15 Radcliff TA, Henderson WG, Stoner TJ, Khuri SF, Dohm M, Hutt E. Patient risk factors, operative care, and outcomes among older community-dwelling male veterans with hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90 (01) 34-42
- 16 Schoenfeld AJ, Ochoa LM, Bader JO, Belmont Jr PJ. Risk factors for immediate postoperative complications and mortality following spine surgery: a study of 3475 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (17) 1577-1582
- 17 Suleiman LI, Ortega G, Ong'uti SK. , et al. Does BMI affect perioperative complications following total knee and hip arthroplasty?. J Surg Res 2012; 174 (01) 7-11
- 18 Linden A, Samuels SJ. Using balance statistics to determine the optimal number of controls in matching studies. J Eval Clin Pract 2013; 19 (05) 968-975