PDF herunterladen
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2018; 79(01): 025-030
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1599238
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Postoperative Care of Patients with High-grade Glioma: Is There a Real Need for the Neurocritical ICU and Early CT Scan?

Roberto Altieri
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
,
Fabio Cofano
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
,
Alessandro Agnoletti
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy
,
Riccardo Fornaro
3   Department of Neurosurgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carita, Novara, Piemonte, Italy
,
Marco Ajello
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
,
Francesco Zenga
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
,
Alessandro Ducati
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
,
Diego Garbossa
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

04. Oktober 2016

04. Januar 2017

Publikationsdatum:
24. März 2017 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background Pressure on economic resources now requires a careful rationalization of services. For adult patients with supratentorial gliomas, there is no consensus on the real need for care in a postoperative neurocritical intensive care unit (NICU) and on the timing of a postsurgical computed tomography (CT) scan. In this retrospective nonrandomized study, we assessed if and when there is a real need for NICU and if an early CT scan could be justified in the absence of neurologic worsening.

Methods Of 264 patients, 21 were admitted to the NICU after the procedure as planned before the surgery for their clinical features (Karnofsky performance status < 70, American Society of Anesthesiologists score > 2, or Charlson Comorbidity Index > 5).

Results The mean stay in the NICU was 19.7 hours. One of these patients had developed a postoperative hematoma that was subsequently removed, and died afterward. The other 243 patients were followed clinically after the procedure: 219 underwent a cerebral CT scan 24 hours after the procedure and were discharged in good condition. The other 24 patients had a cerebral CT scan within 24 hours after the procedure. The early CT showed the presence of a local edema in five cases and a hematoma surgically treated with a subsequent admission to the NICU in two cases.

Conclusion Considering our data, we suggest that NICU should not always be used after craniotomy for supratentorial gliomas. Clinical observation was sufficient to predict early postoperative complications. A CT scan before 24 hours after surgery is not recommended in the absence of clinical worsening.

Keywords

high-grade glioma - glioblastoma - NICU - intensive care unit - CT scan
 

  • References

  • 1 Altieri R, Zenga F, Fontanella MM. , et al. Glioma surgery: technological advances to achieve a maximal safe resection. Surg Technol Int 2015; 27: 297-302
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Khaldi A, Prabhu VC, Anderson DE, Origitano TC. The clinical significance and optimal timing of postoperative computed tomography following cranial surgery. J Neurosurg 2010; 113 (05) 1021-1025
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Oppenlander ME, Wolf AB, Snyder LA. , et al. An extent of resection threshold for recurrent glioblastoma and its risk for neurological morbidity. J Neurosurg 2014; 120 (04) 846-853
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Sanai N, Berger MS. Glioma extent of resection and its impact on patient outcome. Neurosurgery 2008; 62 (04) 753-764 ; discussion 264–266
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hecht N, Spies C, Vajkoczy P. Routine intensive care unit-level care after elective craniotomy: time to rethink. World Neurosurg 2014; 81 (01) 66-68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Fornaro R, Altieri R, Garbossa D, Zenga F, Tartara F, Ducati A. Double concentric craniotomy: safe and effective technique to achieve an en bloc resection of tumor involving both skull and dura. Int J Surg Case Rep 2015; 12: 117-119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Altieri R, Agnoletti A, Quattrucci F. , et al. Molecular biology of gliomas: present and future challenges. Transl Med UniSa 2014; 10: 29-37
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Altieri R, Fontanella M, Agnoletti A. , et al. Role of nitric oxide in glioblastoma therapy: another step to resolve the terrible puzzle?. Transl Med UniSa 2014; 12: 54-59
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Mikuni N, Miyamoto S. Surgical treatment for glioma: extent of resection applying functional neurosurgery. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2010; 50 (09) 720-726
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Olson JJ, Fadul CE, Brat DJ, Mukundan S, Ryken TC. Management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma: guidelines development, value and application. J Neurooncol 2009; 93 (01) 1-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Buglione M, Borghetti P, Pedretti S. , et al; Study from the Brescia Neuro-Oncology Group. Post-surgical therapeutic approaches to glioblastoma patients submitted to biopsy (BA) or “partial” resection (PR): the possibilities to treat also them without renunciations. Radiol Med (Torino) 2015; 120 (10) 975-981
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Yamahara T, Numa Y, Oishi T. , et al. Morphological and flow cytometric analysis of cell infiltration in glioblastoma: a comparison of autopsy brain and neuroimaging. Brain Tumor Pathol 2010; 27 (02) 81-87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Filippini G, Falcone C, Boiardi A. , et al; Brain Cancer Register of the Fondazione IRCCS (Istituto Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico) Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta. Prognostic factors for survival in 676 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed primary glioblastoma. Neuro-oncol 2008; 10 (01) 79-87
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Gorlia T, van den Bent MJ, Hegi ME. , et al. Nomograms for predicting survival of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: prognostic factor analysis of EORTC and NCIC trial 26981-22981/CE.3. Lancet Oncol 2008; 9 (01) 29-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hong B, Wiese B, Bremer M. , et al. Multiple microsurgical resections for repeated recurrence of glioblastoma multiforme. Am J Clin Oncol 2013; 36 (03) 261-268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lawrence YR, Mishra MV, Werner-Wasik M. , et al. Improving prognosis of glioblastoma in the 21st century: who has benefited most?. Cancer 2012; 118 (17) 4228-4234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Carapella CM, Telera S, Oppido PA. Surgery of malignant gliomas: advances and perspectives. Curr Opin Oncol 2011; 23 (06) 624-629
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Rincon F, Mayer SA. Neurocritical care: a distinct discipline?. Curr Opin Crit Care 2007; 13 (02) 115-121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 James ML, Dority J, Gray MC, Bellows ST, McDonagh DL, Brambrink AM. Survey of anesthesiologists practicing in American neurointensive care units as neurointensivists. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2014; 26 (01) 11-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kramer AH, Zygun DA. Do neurocritical care units save lives? Measuring the impact of specialized ICUs. Neurocrit Care 2011; 14 (03) 329-333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kramer AH, Zygun DA. Neurocritical care: why does it make a difference?. Curr Opin Crit Care 2014; 20 (02) 174-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hanak BW, Walcott BP, Nahed BV. , et al. Postoperative intensive care unit requirements after elective craniotomy. World Neurosurg 2014; 81 (01) 165-172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Epstein SK. Extubation failure: an outcome to be avoided. Crit Care 2004; 8 (05) 310-312
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Rothaar RC, Epstein SK. Extubation failure: magnitude of the problem, impact on outcomes, and prevention. Curr Opin Crit Care 2003; 9 (01) 59-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Bilotta F, Caramia R, Paoloni FP. , et al. Early postoperative cognitive recovery after remifentanil-propofol or sufentanil-propofol anaesthesia for supratentorial craniotomy: a randomized trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2007; 24 (02) 122-127
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Rosenberg AL, Zimmerman JE, Alzola C, Draper EA, Knaus WA. Intensive care unit length of stay: recent changes and future challenges. Crit Care Med 2000; 28 (10) 3465-3473
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Fontes RB, Smith AP, Muñoz LF, Byrne RW, Traynelis VC. Relevance of early head CT scans following neurosurgical procedures: an analysis of 892 intracranial procedures at Rush University Medical Center. J Neurosurg 2014; 121 (02) 307-312
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar