Download PDF
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 66(05): 401-403
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1602796
How to Do It
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Totally Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy and Gastric Pull-Up Reconstruction with an Intrathoracic Circular Stapled Anastomosis with a Team of Two (Surgeon and Assistant Only)

Peter P. Grimminger
1   Department of General-, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Universitaetsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Germany
,
Hauke Lang
1   Department of General-, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Universitaetsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

01 March 2017

25 March 2017

Publication Date:
17 May 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

Totally minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is nowadays en vogue.[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] There are several reports showing that already partial minimally invasive esophagectomies (hybrid esophagectomies) with a laparoscopic approach and open transthoracic resection are beneficial for patients due to the reduced operative trauma. Also for total MIE several groups have reported benefits for patients in terms of morbidity and quality of life.[1] [5] However, different approaches and experiences of different esophageal surgery groups are hardly comparable and thus do not allow a simple answer in favor of a specific total MIE technique. To enlighten the field of total MIE, we present the technique as we perform this procedure nearly weekly in our department. The described MIE technique is safe and feasible. Changing to this demonstrating technique, we did not have any mortality so far, even in the first 30 cases. Especially for surgeons who plan to switch from the open surgical technique toward hybrid, MIE or robotic-assisted MIE.

Keywords

MIE - MI ILE - Ivor Lewis - minimally invasive esophagectomy - thoracoscopic esophagectomy

Supplementary Material

 

  • References

  • 1 Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O. , et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg 2012; 256 (01) 95-103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Wullstein C, Ro-Papanikolaou H-Y, Klingebiel C, Ersahin K, Carolus R. Minimally invasive techniques and hybrid operations for esophageal cancer. Viszeralmedizin 2015; 31 (05) 331-336
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Thakkar CM, Kumar AV, Soni HN, Shah AJ, Patel KS, Haribhakti SP. Thoracoscopic part of minimal invasive oesophagectomy in semiprone position: our initial experience. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2014; 24 (04) 337-341
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Metcalfe C, Avery K, Berrisford R. , et al. Comparing open and minimally invasive surgical procedures for oesophagectomy in the treatment of cancer: the ROMIO (Randomised Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open) feasibility study and pilot trial. Health Technol Assess 2016; 20 (48) 1-68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW. , et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 379 (9829): 1887-1892
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar