Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1603507
Failed Vacuum and the Long-Term Neurological Impact on the Offspring
Publication History
16 April 2017
20 April 2017
Publication Date:
22 May 2017 (online)
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to investigate the association between failed vacuum procedures and long-term pediatric neurological morbidity of the offspring (up to the age of 18 years).
Study Design We performed a population-based cohort study to assess the risk of long-term neurological morbidity, including children who were born following either a successful operative vaginal delivery or a failed procedure leading to an emergency cesarean delivery.
Results A total of 7,978 neonates underwent operative vaginal delivery during the study period, meeting the inclusion criteria. The procedure resulted in a successful vaginal delivery in 7,733 (96.9%) cases, while it failed in 245 (3.1%). Total neurological morbidity was comparable between the study groups (3.0 vs. 3.3%, p = 0.8). The Kaplan–Meier survival curve exhibited no difference in the cumulative incidence of total neurological morbidity (log rank, p = 0.967). In the Cox's regression model, a failed vacuum delivery was not associated with an increased long-term neurological morbidity, as compared with a successful procedure, after adjusting for confounders (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.04, 95% confidence interval: 0.5–2.1, p = 0.922).
Conclusion A failed vacuum delivery does not appear to be associated with an increased risk for neurological morbidity of the offspring studied up to 18 years following the event.
Keywords
neonatal morbidity - long term follow-up - operative vaginal delivery - second stage of laborNote
This study was presented in part at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine, Las-Vegas, January 2017.
-
References
- 1 Kessous R, Tirosh D, Weintraub AY, Benshalom-Tirosh N, Sergienko R, Sheiner E. Second stage disorders in patients following a previous cesarean section: vacuum versus repeated cesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013; 287 (06) 1075-1079
- 2 American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Neonatal Encephalopathy and Neurologic Outcome, 2nd ed. Elk Grove Village, IL; Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2014
- 3 Sheiner E, Shoham-Vardi I, Silberstein T, Hallak M, Katz M, Mazor M. Failed vacuum extraction. Maternal risk factors and pregnancy outcome. J Reprod Med 2001; 46 (09) 819-824
- 4 Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ. Births: final data for 2014. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2015; 64 (12) 1-64
- 5 Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Hauth JC. , et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network (MFMU). Failed operative vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114 (05) 1017-1022
- 6 Steiner N, Weintraub AY, Wiznitzer A, Sergienko R, Sheiner E. Episiotomy: the final cut?. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 286 (06) 1369-1373
- 7 Okby R, Sheiner E. Risk factors for neonatal brachial plexus paralysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 286 (02) 333-336
- 8 Werner EF, Janevic TM, Illuzzi J, Funai EF, Savitz DA, Lipkind HS. Mode of delivery in nulliparous women and neonatal intracranial injury. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118 (06) 1239-1246
- 9 Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 154: operative vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126 (05) e56-e65
- 10 Demissie K, Rhoads GG, Smulian JC. , et al. Operative vaginal delivery and neonatal and infant adverse outcomes: population based retrospective analysis. BMJ 2004; 329 (7456): 24-29
- 11 Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Verity L, Swingler R, Patel R. Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study. Lancet 2001; 358 (9289): 1203-1207
- 12 Johanson RB, Menon BK. Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (02) CD000224 . Doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000224
- 13 Walsh CA, Robson M, McAuliffe FM. Mode of delivery at term and adverse neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121 (01) 122-128
- 14 Towner D, Castro MA, Eby-Wilkens E, Gilbert WM. Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury. N Engl J Med 1999; 341 (23) 1709-1714
- 15 Shmueli A, Salman L, Ashwal E. , et al. Perinatal outcomes of vacuum assisted versus cesarean deliveries for prolonged second stage of delivery at term. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017; 30 (08) 886-889
- 16 Aiken CE, Aiken AR, Brockelsby JC, Scott JG. Factors influencing the likelihood of instrumental delivery success. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (04) 796-803
- 17 Statistics TCBo. Israel in figures 2013. Available at: http://www.cbs.gov.il/www/publications/isr_in_n13e.pdf . Accessed May 25, 2015
- 18 Al-Kadri H, Sabr Y, Al-Saif S, Abulaimoun B, Ba'Aqeel H, Saleh A. Failed individual and sequential instrumental vaginal delivery: contributing risk factors and maternal-neonatal complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003; 82 (07) 642-648
- 19 Gopalani S, Bennett K, Critchlow C. Factors predictive of failed operative vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191 (03) 896-902
- 20 Ben-Haroush A, Melamed N, Kaplan B, Yogev Y. Predictors of failed operative vaginal delivery: a single-center experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197 (03) 308.e1-308.e5
- 21 Williams MC, Knuppel RA, O'Brien WF, Weiss A, Kanarek KS. A randomized comparison of assisted vaginal delivery by obstetric forceps and polyethylene vacuum cup. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78 (5 Pt 1): 789-794
- 22 Bahl R, Van de Venne M, Macleod M, Strachan B, Murphy DJ. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study. BJOG 2013; 120 (12) 1526-1532
- 23 Wesley BD, van den Berg BJ, Reece EA. The effect of forceps delivery on cognitive development. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169 (05) 1091-1095
- 24 Ngan HY, Miu P, Ko L, Ma HK. Long-term neurological sequelae following vacuum extractor delivery. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 30 (02) 111-114