The Trump Effect: With No Peer Review, How Do We Know What to Really Believe on Social Media?

Abstract

Social media is a source of news and information for an increasing portion of the general public and physicians. The recent political election was a vivid example of how social media can be used for the rapid spread of “fake news” and that posts on social media are not subject to fact-checking or editorial review. The medical field is susceptible to propagation of misinformation, with poor differentiation between authenticated and erroneous information. Due to the presence of social “bubbles,” surgeons may not be aware of the misinformation that patients are reading, and thus, it may be difficult to counteract the false information that is seen by the general public. Medical professionals may also be prone to unrecognized spread of misinformation and must be diligent to ensure the information they share is accurate.

Keywords

social media - surgery - misinformation

• References

• 1 Pew Research Center. Media use across social media platforms 2016. Pew Research Center. 2016. Available at: http://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/ . Accessed January 31, 2017
• 2 Fox S. The social life of health information. Pew Research Center. 2014. Available at: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/01/15/the-social-life-of-health-information/ . Accessed April 5, 2017
• 3 Diviani N, van den Putte B, Giani S, van Weert JC. Low health literacy and evaluation of online health information: a systematic review of the literature. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17 (05) e112
• 4 Worldtruth.tv. Jackfruit. Available at: http://worldtruth.tv/scientist-reveals-the-most-powerful-cancer-killer-jackfruit/ . Accessed January 19, 2017
• 5 Hoaxy Search. Available at: http://hoaxy.iuni.iu.edu/#query=colorectal&sort=relevant . Accessed January 19, 2017
• 6 Twitter JDB. Bot - or Not? The New York Times. 2017 . Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/30/technology/personaltech/twitter-bot-or-not.html?smid=tw-share . Accessed April 5, 2017
• 7 Baraniuk C. How online “chatbots” are already tricking you. BBC. 2014 . Available at: http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20140609-how-online-bots-are-tricking-you . Accessed April 5, 2017
• 8 Ratkiewicz J, Conover MD, Meiss M, Gonc B, Flammini A, Menczer F. Detecting and Tracking Political Abuse in Social Media. In Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. 2011:297–304
• 9 About the Observatory on Social Media. Available at: http://truthy.indiana.edu/about/ . Accessed January 19, 2017
• 10 Shao C, Ciampaglia GL, Flammini A, Menczer F. Hoaxy: a platform for tracking online misinformation. Proc 25th Int Conf Companion World Wide Web 2016; 745-750
• 11 Neides D. Make 2017 the year to avoid toxins (good luck) and master your domain: Words on Wellness. 2017 . Available at: http://www.cleveland.com/lyndhurst-south-euclid/index.ssf/2017/01/make_2017_the_year_to_avoid_to.html . Accessed January 20, 2017
• 12 Zeltner B. Cleveland Clinic doc apologizes for anti-vax column, hospital promises discipline. 2017 . Available at: http://www.cleveland.com/healthfit/index.ssf/2017/01/cleveland_clinic_doc_apologizes_for_anti_vax_column_hospital_promises_discipline.html . Accessed January 20, 2017
• 13 “Neides.” Available at: http://hoaxy.iuni.iu.edu/#query=neides&sort=relevant . Accessed January 20, 2017
• 14 Zaghiyan KN, Sax HC, Miraflor E. , et al; Cedars-Sinai DVT Study Group. Timing of chemical thromboprophylaxis and deep vein thrombosis in major colorectal surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 2016; 264 (04) 632-639
• 15 (AnnalsofSurgery). “RCT: Does the timing of Chemoprophylaxis in Major #ColorectalSurgery Matter? #VisualAbstract. Available at: http://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/Abstract/publishahead/Timing_of_Chemical_Thromboprophylaxis_and_Deep.96499.aspx…pic.twitter.com/wRK1NS6S7z
• 16 (worldjsurg). “Discontinuity of the Bowel Following Damage Control Operation Revisited #WJS #VisualAbstract #traumasurgery - http://rdcu.be/pomm
• 17 Talving P, Chouliaras K, Eastman A. , et al. Discontinuity of the bowel following damage control operation revisited: a multi-institutional study. World J Surg 2017; 41 (01) 146-151
• 18 Ferguson C, Inglis SC, Newton PJ, Cripps PJ, MacDonald PS, Davidson PM. Social media: a tool to spread information: a case study analysis of twitter conversation at the Cardiac Society of Australia & New Zealand 61st annual scientific meeting 2013. Coll Aust J Nurs Pract Scholarsh Res 2014; 21 (02) 89-93
• 19 McKendrick DR, Cumming GP, Lee AJ. Increased use of Twitter at a medical conference: a report and a review of the educational opportunities. J Med Internet Res 2012; 14 (06) e176
• 20 Neill A, Cronin JJ, Brannigan D, O'Sullivan R, Cadogan M. The impact of social media on a major international emergency medicine conference. Emerg Med J 2014; 31 (05) 401-404
• 21 Canvasser NE, Ramo C, Morgan TM, Zheng K, Hollenbeck BK, Ghani KR. The use of social media in endourology: an analysis of the 2013 World Congress of Endourology meeting. J Endourol 2015; 29 (05) 615-620
• 22 Hartling L, McAlister FA, Rowe BH, Ezekowitz J, Friesen C, Klassen TP. Challenges in systematic reviews of therapeutic devices and procedures. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142 (12 Pt 2): 1100-1111
• 23 Scherer RW, Langenberg P, von Elm E. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (02) MR000005
• 24 Weintraub WH. Are published manuscripts representative of the surgical meeting abstracts? An objective appraisal. J Pediatr Surg 1987; 22 (01) 11-13
• 25 Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH. , et al. An observational study of orthopaedic abstracts and subsequent full-text publications. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84-A [phone]
• 26 Klassen TP, Wiebe N, Russell K. , et al. Abstracts of randomized controlled trials presented at the society for pediatric research meeting: an example of publication bias. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002; 156 (05) 474-479
• 27 Nikolov D, Oliveira DFM, Flammini A, Menczer F. Measuring online social bubbles. Peer J Computer Science 2015; 1: e38
• 28 Jacob B. Revolutionizing Surgery Through Worlwide Collaboration. Available at: https://www.facebookstories.com/stories/99818/revolutionizing-surgery-through-worldwide-collaboration . Accessed February 6, 2017
• 29 Mabvuure NT, Rodrigues J, Klimach S, Nduka C. A cross-sectional study of the presence of United Kingdom (UK) plastic surgeons on social media. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (03) 362-367
• 30 McEvenue G, Copeland A, Devon KM, Semple JL. How social are we? a cross-sectional study of the website presence and social media activity of Canadian plastic surgeons. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36 (09) 1079-1084
• 31 Cochrane AR, McDonald JJ, Brady RR. Social media use among United Kingdom vascular surgeons: a cross-sectional study. Ann Vasc Surg 2016; 33: 252-257
• 32 Park S, Oh H-K, Park G. , et al. The source and credibility of colorectal cancer information on twitter. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95 (07) e2775
• 33 Alnemer KA, Alhuzaim WM, Alnemer AA. , et al. Are health-related tweets evidence based? Review and analysis of health-related tweets on twitter. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17 (10) e246
• 34 Love B, Himelboim I, Holton A, Stewart K. Twitter as a source of vaccination information: content drivers and what they are saying. Am J Infect Control 2013; 41 (06) 568-570