Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34(02): 108-120
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1606537
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Quality of Life after Free Fibula Flap Reconstruction of Segmental Mandibular Defects

Jonas Löfstrand
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
,
Marcus Nyberg
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
,
Therese Karlsson
2   Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
,
Andri Thórarinsson
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
,
Göran Kjeller
3   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
,
Mattias Lidén
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
,
Victoria Fröjd
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

11 June 2017

31 July 2017

Publication Date:
13 September 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Free fibula flap (FFF) is considered gold standard in the reconstruction of mandibular defects. Despite the frequent use, patients' quality of life (QoL) after reconstruction has been sparsely investigated. This study aims to evaluate QoL and outcomes in patients who have undergone FFF reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects.

Methods A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients (n = 73) operated at a single center during the years 2000 to 2014 was performed. Charts were reviewed and all living patients (n = 41) were invited to fill out three quality of life questionnaires (QLQ): SF-36, EORTC QLQ-C30, and QLQ-H&N35. Factors associated with poor outcome were derived from regression models and the results of the QLQs were compared with Swedish reference populations. Subgroup analysis was performed for two groups depending on reconstructive indication: cancer and osteoradionecrosis (ORN).

Results The response rate of the QLQs was 93%. General QoL did not differ from reference populations, but the study group had significantly larger proportions of poor functioning patients in three domains in EORTC QLQ-C30: global health status, role functioning, and social functioning. Patients also reported a high incidence of poor functioning/high symptom burden in EORTC QLQ-H&N35, with a significantly higher frequency in the ORN group compared with the cancer group for the domains “swallowing” and “social eating.” The overall flap success rate was 92% and complication rate was 48%. Previous surgery had a significant association with reoperation due to bleeding, and longer duration of surgery was significantly associated with local infection.

Conclusion When evaluated with validated QLQs, most patients experienced persistent functional loss in one or several domains, but still perceived a general QoL that is close to that of reference populations. Patients having ORN as the indication for surgery, as compared with cancer, reported a higher frequency of poor functioning patients in disease-specific QoL domains.

Keywords

head and neck cancer - osteoradionecrosis - fibula flap - microsurgery - quality of life - mandibular reconstruction
 

  • References

  • 1 Kildal M, Wei FC, Chang YM. Free vascularized bone grafts for reconstruction of traumatic bony defects of mandible and maxilla. World J Surg 2001; 25 (08) 1067-1074
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Chana JS, Chang YM, Wei FC. , et al. Segmental mandibulectomy and immediate free fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap reconstruction with endosteal implants: an ideal treatment method for mandibular ameloblastoma. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113 (01) 80-87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Celik N, Wei FC, Chen HC. , et al. Osteoradionecrosis of the mandible after oromandibular cancer surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (06) 1875-1881
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Taylor GI, Miller GD, Ham FJ. The free vascularized bone graft. A clinical extension of microvascular techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 1975; 55 (05) 533-544
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hidalgo DA. Fibula free flap: a new method of mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 84 (01) 71-79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Chaine A, Pitak-Arnnop P, Hivelin M, Dhanuthai K, Bertrand JC, Bertolus C. Postoperative complications of fibular free flaps in mandibular reconstruction: an analysis of 25 consecutive cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 108 (04) 488-495
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Wei FC, Demirkan F, Chen HC, Chen IH. Double free flaps in reconstruction of extensive composite mandibular defects in head and neck cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103 (01) 39-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Chang SY, Huang JJ, Tsao CK. , et al. Does ischemia time affect the outcome of free fibula flaps for head and neck reconstruction? A review of 116 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (06) 1988-1995
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Fujiki M, Miyamoto S, Sakuraba M, Nagamatsu S, Hayashi R. A comparison of perioperative complications following transfer of fibular and scapular flaps for immediate mandibular reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66 (03) 372-375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Corbitt C, Skoracki RJ, Yu P, Hanasono MM. Free flap failure in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck 2014; 36 (10) 1440-1445
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Wallace CG, Chang YM, Tsai CY, Wei FC. Harnessing the potential of the free fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap in mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (01) 305-314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Wei FC, Yazar S, Lin CH, Cheng MH, Tsao CK, Chiang YC. Double free flaps in head and neck reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2005; 32 (03) 303-308 , v
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Penha TR, Botter B, Heuts EM, Voogd AC, von Meyenfeldt MF, van der Hulst RR. Quality of life in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema and reconstructive breast surgery. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (06) 484-490
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Tessler O, Bartow MJ, Tremblay-Champagne MP. , et al. Long-term health-related quality of life outcomes in digital replantation versus revision amputation. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (06) 446-451
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Li W, Xu Z, Liu F, Huang S, Dai W, Sun C. Vascularized free forearm flap versus free anterolateral thigh perforator flaps for reconstruction in patients with head and neck cancer: assessment of quality of life. Head Neck 2013; 35 (12) 1808-1813
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Yang W, Zhao S, Liu F, Sun M. Health-related quality of life after mandibular resection for oral cancer: reconstruction with free fibula flap. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2014; 19 (04) e414-e418
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Murphy BA, Ridner S, Wells N, Dietrich M. Quality of life research in head and neck cancer: a review of the current state of the science. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2007; 62 (03) 251-267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hammerlid E, Taft C. Health-related quality of life in long-term head and neck cancer survivors: a comparison with general population norms. Br J Cancer 2001; 84 (02) 149-156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware Jr JE. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey--I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41 (10) 1349-1358
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Derogar M, van der Schaaf M, Lagergren P. Reference values for the EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life questionnaire in a random sample of the Swedish population. Acta Oncol 2012; 51 (01) 10-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Tarlov AR, Ware Jr JE, Greenfield S, Nelson EC, Perrin E, Zubkoff M. The Medical Outcomes Study. An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA 1989; 262 (07) 925-930
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Persson LO, Karlsson J, Bengtsson C, Steen B, Sullivan M. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey II. Evaluation of clinical validity: results from population studies of elderly and women in Gothenborg. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51 (11) 1095-1103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Sullivan M, Karlsson J. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey III. Evaluation of criterion-based validity: results from normative population. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51 (11) 1105-1113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Ware Jr JE, Keller SD, Gandek B, Brazier JE, Sullivan M. Evaluating translations of health status questionnaires. Methods from the IQOLA project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1995; 11 (03) 525-551
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ware JE, Snow KK. SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: New England Medical Center, The Health Institute; 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B. , et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85 (05) 365-376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K, Groenvold M, Curran D, Bottomley A. ; On behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. The EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual, 3rd ed. Brussels: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer; 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Bjordal K, de Graeff A, Fayers PM. , et al; EORTC Quality of Life Group. A 12 country field study of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) and the head and neck cancer specific module (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) in head and neck patients. Eur J Cancer 2000; 36 (14) 1796-1807
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Scott NW, Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bottomley NK, Groenvold M, Gundy C. ; On behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. EORTC QLQ-C30 Reference Values; 2008
    PubMed
  • 30 Djärv T, Blazeby JM, Lagergren P. Predictors of postoperative quality of life after esophagectomy for cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27 (12) 1963-1968
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Djärv T, Metcalfe C, Avery KN, Lagergren P, Blazeby JM. Prognostic value of changes in health-related quality of life scores during curative treatment for esophagogastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28 (10) 1666-1670
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Goldwaser BR, Chuang SK, Kaban LB, August M. Risk factor assessment for the development of osteoradionecrosis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65 (11) 2311-2316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar