Outcomes of Esophageal Replacement: Gastric Pull-Up and Colonic Interposition Procedures

Abstract

Aim No consensus exists about the optimal surgical technique for esophageal replacement. This study reports the surgical outcomes for the gastric pull-up and the colonic interposition procedures.

Materials and Methods A retrospective review of children undergoing esophageal replacement surgery between January 2001 and June 2015 across four different pediatric surgery centers was conducted. Data collected included indications, epidemiology, surgical technique, complications, and outcomes. Patients were divided into group A, those that had a gastric pull-up procedure and group B, those that had a colonic interposition procedure.

Results In total, 50 patients were included; 29 in group A and 21 in group B. Indications included esophageal atresia, caustic ingestion, and infective esophageal stricture. The median age at the time of surgery was 13 months. The mean length of follow-up was 5.2 years. Three patients died giving a mortality rate of 6%; 2 in group A and 1 in group B.

In both groups, early postoperative complications included infective complications, such as wound infections, sepsis, and pneumonia (11), anastomotic leak (7), and respiratory complications (7). Late complications included adhesive bowel obstruction (2), anastomotic strictures (4), redundancy (1), and jejunostomy problems (1). Septic complications and anastomotic strictures occurred more frequently in group B. Further surgery was needed in eight patients; this was significantly higher in group B. Full oral feeding was achieved within 6 months in 91.5%.

Conclusion The gastric pull-up and colonic interposition have comparable mortality and outcomes. The colonic interposition was associated with a higher rate of early septic complications, anastomotic strictures, and need for further surgery.

Keywords

colonic interposition - gastric pull-up - esophageal replacement - esophageal atresia - caustic ingestion injury

• References

• 1 Spitz L, Kiely E, Pierro A, Coran A, Hamza A, Lund D. Gastric transposition in children--a 21-year experience. J Pediatr Surg 2004; 39 (03) 276-281
• 2 Spitz L. Gastric transposition via the mediastinal route for infants with long-gap esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 1984; 19 (02) 149-154
• 3 Spitz L. Gastric transposition in children. Semin Pediatr Surg 2009; 18 (01) 30-33
• 4 Sherman Jr CD, Waterston D. Oesophageal reconstruction in children using intrathoracic colon. Arch Dis Child 1957; 32 (161) 11-16
• 5 Hamza AF. Colonic replacement in cases of esophageal atresia. Semin Pediatr Surg 2009; 18 (01) 40-43
• 6 Humphreys GH, Ferrer Jr JM. Management of Esophageal Atresia. Am J Surg 1964; 107: 406-411
• 7 Bax KMA. Jejunum for bridging long-gap esophageal atresia. Semin Pediatr Surg 2009; 18 (01) 34-39
• 8 Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML. , et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009; 250 (02) 187-196
• 9 Olsen EM, Petersen J, Skovgaard AM, Weile B, Jørgensen T, Wright CM. Failure to thrive: the prevalence and concurrence of anthropometric criteria in a general infant population. Arch Dis Child 2007; 92 (02) 109-114
• 10 Loukogeorgakis SP, Pierro A. Replacement surgery for esophageal atresia. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2013; 23 (03) 182-190
• 11 Gallo G, Zwaveling S, Groen H, Van der Zee D, Hulscher J. Long-gap esophageal atresia: a meta-analysis of jejunal interposition, colon interposition, and gastric pull-up. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2012; 22 (06) 420-425
• 12 Arul GS, Parikh D. Oesophageal replacement in children. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2008; 90 (01) 7-12
• 13 Davenport M, Hosie GP, Tasker RC, Gordon I, Kiely EM, Spitz L. Long-term effects of gastric transposition in children: a physiological study. J Pediatr Surg 1996; 31 (04) 588-593
• 14 Coopman S, Michaud L, Halna-Tamine M. , et al. Long-term outcome of colon interposition after esophagectomy in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2008; 47 (04) 458-462
• 15 Boukerrouche A. Isoperistaltic left colic graft interposition via a retrosternal approach for esophageal reconstruction in patients with a caustic stricture: mortality, morbidity, and functional results. Surg Today 2014; 44 (05) 827-833
• 16 Rode H, Cywes S, Millar AJ, Davies MR. Colonic oesophageal replacement in children--functional results. Z Kinderchir 1986; 41 (04) 201-205
• 17 Burgos L, Barrena S, Andrés AM. , et al. Colonic interposition for esophageal replacement in children remains a good choice: 33-year median follow-up of 65 patients. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (02) 341-345
• 18 Lima M, Destro F, Cantone N, Maffi M, Ruggeri G, Dòmini R. Long-term follow-up after esophageal replacement in children: 45-Year single-center experience. J Pediatr Surg 2015; 50 (09) 1457-1461
• 19 Greene CL, DeMeester SR, Augustin F. , et al. Long-term quality of life and alimentary satisfaction after esophagectomy with colon interposition. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 98 (05) 1713-1719
• 20 Borgnon J, Tounian P, Auber F. , et al. Esophageal replacement in children by an isoperistaltic gastric tube: a 12-year experience. Pediatr Surg Int 2004; 20 (11-12): 829-833
• 21 Lindahl H, Rintala R, Sariola H, Louhimo I. Long-term endoscopic and flow cytometric follow-up of colon interposition. J Pediatr Surg 1992; 27 (07) 859-861