Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2017; 33(06): 591-597
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1608766
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Secondary Treatment of Naso-orbital Ethmoid Injuries

Alan S. Herford
1   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
01 December 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Central midface fractures should be treated early due to their propensity for secondary devastating and disfiguring consequences. For example, the expected sequelae to inadequately repaired naso-orbital ethmoid (NOE) injuries include shortened retruded nose, altered palpebral fissures, telecanthus, enophthalmos, and ocular dystopia, to name a few. Secondary repair of NOE fractures is indicated when primary surgical repair is not possible and for any of the aforementioned sequelae. When secondary repair of NOE fractures is necessary, these should be planned carefully while focusing on restoring facial function and aesthetics. Specific attention should focus on midface projection and intercanthal relationship. Virtual surgical planning as intraoperative navigation can be helpful for complex secondary reconstructions.

Keywords

NOE fracture - secondary treatment - secondary deformities - revision surgery - saddle nose deformity
 

  • References

  • 1 Khader R, Wallender A, Van Sickels JE, Cunningham LL. Secondary reconstruction of panfacial fractures. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 18 (01) 99-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 He D, Zhang Y, Ellis III E. Panfacial fractures: analysis of 33 cases treated late. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65 (12) 2459-2465
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Singh M, Ricci JA, Caterson EJ. Use of intraoperative computed tomography for revisional procedures in patients with complex midfacial trauma. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015; 3 (07) e463
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Herford AS, Miller M, Lauritano F, Cervino G, Signorino F, Maiorana C. The use of virtual surgical planning and navigation in the treatment of orbital trauma. Chin J Traumatol 2017; 20 (01) 9-13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Jalbert F, Boetto S, Nadon F, Lauwers F, Schmidt E, Lopez R. One-step primary reconstruction for complex craniofacial resection with PEEK custom-made implants. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014; 42 (02) 141-148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Becelli R, Renzi G, Mannino G, Cerulli G, Iannetti G. Posttraumatic obstruction of lacrimal pathways: a retrospective analysis of 58 consecutive naso-orbitoethmoid fractures. J Craniofac Surg 2004; 15 (01) 29-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Herford AS, Ying T, Brown B. Outcomes of severely comminuted (type III) nasoorbitoethmoid fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63 (09) 1266-1277
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Herford AS, Tandon R, Pivetti L, Cicciù M. Treatment of severe frontobasilar fractures in growing patients: a case series evaluation. Chin J Traumatol 2013; 16 (04) 199-203
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Imola MJ, Ducic Y, Adelson RT. The secondary correction of post-traumatic craniofacial deformities. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 139 (05) 654-660
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Herford AS. Dorsal nasal reconstruction using bone harvested from the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 62 (09) 1082-1087
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bell RB, Markiewicz MR. Computer-assisted planning, stereolithographic modeling, and intraoperative navigation for complex orbital reconstruction: a descriptive study in a preliminary cohort. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67 (12) 2559-2570
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar