Semin Speech Lang 2018; 39(01): 015-024
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1608852
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Dysarthria following Stroke

Kristie A. Spencer
1   Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
,
Katherine A. Brown
1   Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 January 2018 (online)

Abstract

Dysarthria is a common consequence of stroke and can have a detrimental influence on communication and quality of life. Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) play an important role in the evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke survivors who present with dysarthria. An understanding of the physiologic reason behind the altered speech characteristics, such as weakness or incoordination, can facilitate differential diagnosis, guide evaluation strategies, and influence treatment approaches. An initial comprehensive speech evaluation is comprised of examination of the speech mechanism, screening of speech subsystems, perceptual assessment, and intelligibility measurement. Management strategies focus on optimizing communication through compensatory strategies as well as providing physiologic support. The SLP is also responsible for educating family and staff regarding strategies that can facilitate communication.

 
  • References

  • 1 Duffy JR. Motor Speech Disorders: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis, and Management. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby; 2013
  • 2 Lawrence ES, Coshall C, Dundas R. , et al. Estimates of the prevalence of acute stroke impairments and disability in a multiethnic population. Stroke 2001; 32 (06) 1279-1284
  • 3 Ali M, Lyden P, Brady M. ; VISTA Collaboration. Aphasia and dysarthria in acute stroke: recovery and functional outcome. Int J Stroke 2015; 10 (03) 400-406
  • 4 Yorkston KM, Beukelman DR, Strand EA, Hakel M. Management of Motor Speech Disorders in Children and Adults. 3rd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 2010
  • 5 Dickson S, Barbour RS, Brady M, Clark AM, Paton G. Patients' experiences of disruptions associated with post-stroke dysarthria. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2008; 43 (02) 135-153
  • 6 Darley FL, Aronson AE, Brown JR. Motor Speech Disorders. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 1975
  • 7 Gupta D, Kuruvilla A. Vascular parkinsonism: what makes it different?. Postgrad Med J 2011; 87 (1034): 829-836
  • 8 Zijlmans JCM, Daniel SE, Hughes AJ, Révész T, Lees AJ. Clinicopathological investigation of vascular parkinsonism, including clinical criteria for diagnosis. Mov Disord 2004; 19 (06) 630-640
  • 9 Bunton K, Kent RD, Duffy JR, Rosenbek JC, Kent JF. Listener agreement for auditory-perceptual ratings of dysarthria. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2007; 50 (06) 1481-1495
  • 10 Dilworth C. The role of the speech language pathologist in acute stroke. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2008; 11: S108-S118
  • 11 Verdolini K, Palmer PM. Assessment of a “Profiles” approach to voice screening. J Med Speech-Lang Pathol 1997; 5 (04) 217-232
  • 12 Allen GI, Tsukahara N. Cerebrocerebellar communication systems. Physiol Rev 1974; 54 (04) 957-1006
  • 13 Mazzoni P, Shabbott B, Cortés JC. Motor control abnormalities in Parkinson's disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2012; 2 (06) a009282
  • 14 Hixon TJ, Hawley JL, Wilson KJ. An around-the-house device for the clinical determination of respiratory driving pressure: a note on making simple even simpler. J Speech Hear Disord 1982; 47 (04) 413-415
  • 15 Wannberg P, Schalling E, Hartelius L. Perceptual assessment of dysarthria: comparison of a general and a detailed assessment protocol. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 2016; 41 (04) 159-167
  • 16 Patel R, Connaghan K, Franco D. , et al. “The caterpillar”: a novel reading passage for assessment of motor speech disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2013; 22 (01) 1-9
  • 17 Yorkston KM, Beukelman D, Hakel M, Dorsey M. Speech Intelligibility Test. Lincoln, NE: Institute for Rehabilitation Science and Engineering at Madonna Rehabilitation Hospital; 2007
  • 18 Walshe M, Peach RK, Miller N. Dysarthria impact profile: development of a scale to measure psychosocial effects. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2009; 44 (05) 693-715
  • 19 Mackenzie C, Kelly S, Paton G, Brady M, Muir M. The Living with Dysarthria group for post-stroke dysarthria: the participant voice. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2013; 48 (04) 402-420
  • 20 Baylor C, Burns M, Eadie T, Britton D, Yorkston K. A qualitative study of interference with communicative participation across communication disorders in adults. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2011; 20 (04) 269-287
  • 21 Mullen R. Evidence for whom? ASHA's National Outcomes Measurement System. J Commun Disord 2004; 37 (05) 413-417
  • 22 Hustad KC, Jones T, Dailey S. Implementing speech supplementation strategies: effects on intelligibility and speech rate of individuals with chronic severe dysarthria. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2003; 46 (02) 462-474
  • 23 Hanson EK, Yorkston KM, Beukelman DR. Speech supplementation techniques for dysarthria: a systematic review. J Med Speech-Lang Pathol 2004; 12 (02) IX-XXIX
  • 24 Andreetta MD, Adams SG, Dykstra AD, Jog M. Evaluation of speech amplification devices in Parkinson's disease. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2016; 25 (01) 29-45
  • 25 Park S, Theodoros D, Finch E, Cardell E. Be clear: a new intensive speech treatment for adults with nonprogressive dysarthria. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2016; 25 (01) 97-110
  • 26 Fager S, Beukelman DR, Fried-Oken M, Jakobs T, Baker J. Access interface strategies. Assist Technol 2011; 24 (01) 25-33
  • 27 Hustad KC, Garcia JM. Aided and unaided speech supplementation strategies: effect of alphabet cues and iconic hand gestures on dysarthric speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2005; 48 (05) 996-1012
  • 28 Spencer KA, Yorkston KM, Duffy JR. Behavioral management of respiratory/phonatory dysfunction from dysarthria: a flowchart for guidance in clinical decision making. J Med Speech-Lang Pathol 2003; 11 (02) XXXIX-LXI
  • 29 Hakel M, Beukelman DR, Fager S, Green J, Marshall J. Nasal obturator for velopharyngeal dysfunction in dysarthria: technical report on a one-way valve. J Med Speech-Lang Pathol 2004; 12 (04) 155-159
  • 30 Beukelman DR, Yorkston K, Dowden P, Minifie F. Effect of rate control on dysarthric speech. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985; 66 (08) 525-526
  • 31 Mackenzie C, Muir M, Allen C. Non-speech oro-motor exercise use in acquired dysarthria management: regimes and rationales. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2010; 45 (06) 617-629
  • 32 Bunton K. Speech versus nonspeech: different tasks, different neural organization. Semin Speech Lang 2008; 29 (04) 267-275
  • 33 Clark HM. Neuromuscular treatments for speech and swallowing: a tutorial. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2003; 12 (04) 400-415
  • 34 Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008; 51 (01) S225-S239
  • 35 McCauley RJ, Strand E, Lof GL, Schooling T, Frymark T. Evidence-based systematic review: effects of nonspeech oral motor exercises on speech. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2009; 18 (04) 343-360
  • 36 Ludlow CL, Hoit J, Kent R. , et al. Translating principles of neural plasticity into research on speech motor control recovery and rehabilitation. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008; 51 (01) S240-S258
  • 37 Brown DL, Smith TL, Knepper LE. Evaluation of five primitive reflexes in 240 young adults. Neurology 1998; 51 (01) 322-322
  • 38 Pierce JE, Cotton S, Perry A. Alternating and sequential motion rates in older adults. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2013; 48 (03) 257-264